Civil Engineering Licensure Examination Top-notchers January 2008
1st Placer:
KRYZEL APDIAN SUBANG - Mapua Institute of Technology - 96.50
2nd Placer:
ABDEL JHUNALEX ARINDIG ESCANDER - Mindanao State University-Marawi - 94.75
3rd Placer:
RAJED REMEGIO MAGLINTE - Garcia College of Technology - 94.80
4th Placer:
KRIS NOWELL POLO JASME - Eastern Visayas University-Tacloban - 94.40
5th Placer:
MA THERESA YAGUEL OJEDA - Ateneo De Naga - 94.00
6th Placers:
JEFFREY PILOTON CIMAGALA - University of the East-Caloocan - 93.90
JONATHAN OAÑA EMPAMANO - University of the Philippines-Los Baños - 93.90
REYSAN CABALLERO GONZALES - Bulacan State University - 93.90
NEMAR MORALES OBOD - University of Sto. Thomas - 93.90
LEINDJIEL ESTEBAN SICAT - Technological University of the Philippines-Manila - 93.90
7th Placer:
PATRICK BABARAN CANCERAN - University of Saint Louis-Tuguegarao - 93.55
8th Placers:
MICHAEL MOJICA CADATAL - Polytechnic University Of The Philippines-Main-Sta. Mesa - 93.20
JENNIBETH PARRONE MARQUEZ - Mapua Institute Of Technology - 93.20
9th Placer:
GLENN GIL DAVID TAMAYO - University Of The Philippines-Los Baños - 93.00
10th Placer:
RONNEL BARREDO GIANAN - Catanduanes State Colleges-Virac - 92.85
TOP PERFORMING SCHOOLS (with 10 ore more examinees):
1st Place:
University of the Philippines – Los Baños:29/29 - 100.00%
2nd Place:
Ateneo de Naga:14/17 - 82.00%
3rd Place:
University of Santo Tomas: 64 /51 - 80.00%
Isabela State University-Ilagan:10/8 - 80.00%
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 2 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
1 ABADESA, HEIDI DELLOVA
2 ABALOS, MARVIN GARNACE
3 ABARQUEZ, JULITO LABALAN
4 ABAYA, REYNULFO JR TUNGKUL
5 ABAYABAY, NORMAN WILFRED GODINEZ
6 ABAYON, JOY FATIMA JACOBO
7 ABDULLAH, ASHNAIRA ANGAGAO
8 ABEDEJOS, SALVADOR JR ITEM
9 ABEJO, ABEGAIL REGALADO
10 ABELA, LARRY FLORES
11 ABELLA, JENIFER MENDEZ
12 ABELLA, MARIE BERNADETTE ARMANDO
13 ABELLA, MARIE FE ENRIQUEZ
14 ABELLO, KAROL HOBANIL
15 ABENIDO, JUNRY BENECIO
16 ABERGOS, ARIS CO
17 ABIERA, LEIZEL APUYAN
18 ABIQUE, JULIUS DELA CRUZ
19 ABLAZA, ELADIO III CAROLINA
20 ABREU, JEFFREY DELAPA
21 ABUAN, JACQUELYN APAT
22 ABUDA, FELOMINO JR LACDO-O
23 ABUELA, JOAN OMBAO
24 ABUNDO, JENNIFER DE VERA
25 ACELO, EUFEMIO JR IRADIEL
26 ACIBAR, JAMES LEE TABON
27 ACLAN, MARLON DAGAANG
28 ACORDA, EZTELA PELAGIO
29 ACORDA, PRECIOUS PEARL CALAPUTU
30 ACOSTA, CHRISTIAN BALAIS
31 ACOSTA, MARK ANTHONY EVANGELISTA
32 ADAO, WILSON BALMACEDA
33 ADOR, JOSEPH BANGA
34 ADRIANO, ANGELICA EMBALLA
35 ADRIANO, CHARDIE GALANG
36 AFRICA, WILFREDO JR SANCHEZ
37 AGACIA, RAY RONALD ACOSTA
38 AGACID, RICHARD LOUIE DEJANIO
39 AGAR, MICHAEL GUIAMAN
40 AGBAS, KIM SOLAJO
41 AGCAMARAN, MARCELO JR TEJADA
42 AGCAOILI, HEHERSON LINTAG
43 AGCAOILI, NEIL IAN AGBAYANI
44 AGIAS, RONELYN BUBUTAN
45 AGLIAM, NOEL JOSE
46 AGNER, ANTHONY LAMBRINTO
47 AGRAMON, HERBERT ARISTEO CUMLAT
48 AGUB, MARIA ROCHELLE PINSON
49 AGUILAR, ANEL PATRICK MOLINA
50 AGUILAR, FERNANDO CANES
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 3 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
51 AGUINALDO, JERVIN RIEGO
52 AGUSTIN, ARLENE DELA CRUZ
53 AGUSTIN, REYNALDO JR BAUTISTA
54 AGUSTINES, EDWARD DELA CRUZ
55 AGWAYAWAY, MC NEIL PUMARAS
56 AJERO, MICHAEL CHAN
57 AJIDO, EXEQUIEL JR MASIRAG
58 ALABANZA, DANNY MARAVILLA
59 ALAMA, ROSEMIA RASCAL
60 ALARCIO, DEVIJAH MENDOZA
61 ALAVA, JHONEL ENCINAS
62 ALAWI, ABDUL GAFFUR DIAMPUAN
63 ALBOS, NIZEFORA MIRAN
64 ALCALA, LEONARD SAAVEDRA
65 ALCANTARA, JED UMALI
66 ALCORIZA, GLAZA GARCIA
67 ALDAY, CRIS DIZON
68 ALEJANDRO, EDISON CASTILLO
69 ALEJANDRO, MA AILEEN BOCO
70 ALIGUYON, NELSON JR TAGUINAY
71 ALINIANTE, NORVIN TEDRIA
72 ALMIROL, NOEL HUFALAR
73 ALMOJUELA, NIKKI SOCITO
74 ALQUEZA, RODOLFO JR APARICIO
75 ALULOD, HAZEL PORTERA
76 ALVARAN, LIEZL SERMESE
77 ALVAREZ, JAIME JR TORRIFIEL
78 ALVAREZ, MARK JOHNSON BAG-AO
79 ALVAREZ, RICKY LULAB
80 ALVENDIA, DENVER ORBILLO
81 ALVIOLA, RO JOHN VIVARES
82 ALZAGA, CHRISTIAN MANUEL GOGOLA
83 AMARADO, GIOVANI FAJARDO
84 AMARO, RYAN TORALDE
85 AMER, ABDULJABAR DERON
86 AMER, MOAMAR MATUAN
87 AMION, LOUIE DIZON
88 AMOGAWIN, KARL STEPHEN RAMIREZ
89 AMORA, SERGIO III LACANG
90 AMOYO, JON-JON AVILA
91 ANABO, JIMMY JR ESPARAGOZA
92 ANAÑO, CHRISTAN DESTURA
93 ANAÑO, JANOUPHER RAY DESTURA
94 ANCHETA, JUVI MAR CALAPIT
95 ANCLA, VAN SHEM MAGNO
96 ANDRADA, MARICEL DOMINGO
97 ANG, KENNETH RYAN YU
98 ANG, MARVIN DARYL ZORILLA
99 ANGEL, LAICHEN ALFONSO ILACAD
100 ANGELES, ARNEL CHENG
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 4 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
101 ANGELES, BENSON JAMES DIMAALA
102 ANGOT, DIOMEDES DAGUMAN
103 ANTAO, HUSIEN AMUD
104 ANTIOQUIA, ROSALIN TABANAO
105 ANTO, ANDREW CAHATIAN
106 ANTONIO, JOHN RYAN AMPIL
107 ANYAYAHAN, SHARMAINE MERCADO
108 APARICIO, RANDEL DEV PETALCORIN
109 APILADO, MARGIE LOU SERRANO
110 APOSTOL, VENRICK SERRANO
111 AQUINO, ALLAN AGBUYA
112 AQUINO, GERALD ORTIZ
113 AQUINO, JOSEPHUS QUITO
114 AQUINO, MARIA KATRINA CABUGOS
115 ARAGON, JOHN RAYMOND OCAMPO
116 ARAM, RUDEL RABUYA
117 ARANAS, JOEMAR ALBERTO
118 ARBO, FRANCIS LYNDON JR RIÑON
119 ARCE, PHILIP RENLOI DIMAUNAHAN
120 ARCE, VINCENT PANIZARES
121 ARCIAGA, AR-BI AGLORO
122 ARELLANO, ANNABELLE APOCAY
123 ARELLANO, LEILANI SANTIAGO
124 ARIAS, JULIUS JOHN MUSA
125 AROCENA, RALPH DARWIN RAMOS
126 ARRIOLA, PATRICK BERMUDEZ
127 ARROYO, MARK ROBINSON ULANDEZ
128 ASAMA, JEREMY TORIO
129 ASENIERO, MARBEN PAGHASIAN
130 ASI, RECIALYNE ASI
131 ASIS, CONSTANTE LOPEZ
132 ASPILAN, DAISY ANGANAYON
133 ASUNCION, ROMEO JR CABIG
134 ASUNCION, SONNY ASTILLERO
135 ATANOSO, CYRILL CARREON
136 ATUTUBO, ANN MARGARET ABAT
137 AURELIO, SEMANTHA CHESCA CORPUZ
138 AURESTILA, RON MARK CANOBIS
139 AVILA, ALBERT JR VILOG
140 AVILA, WENDELL CRUZ
141 AZARCON, RANDY LOPE DAVID
142 AZUL, MARK ANTHONY TENA
143 AZUR, ALBERT ANDREW RETANAL
144 BAAY, ANDRO JOHN RAFER
145 BACAL, RONALD CASTILLO
146 BACANI, HAZEL ANN LICUDINE
147 BADAJOS, CHRISTIAN JEFF FLORES
148 BADAJOS, MARY JOY CATABAY
149 BADUA, JONEL CABANIG
150 BADURIA, DANIEL BILON
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 5 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
151 BAGAOISAN, ONDEE GADO
152 BAGAT, JOHN ALLAN INDAYA
153 BAGNOL, CARLO ESTRELLANTE
154 BAGORIO, GEOVANNIE BALISALISA
155 BAGUE, EDSEL TRISTAN WONG
156 BAGWEL, QUIMSON SALVADOR
157 BAHATAN, SHERWIN JAY GANACA
158 BALAIBO, JENNY GAY CASABUENA
159 BALAN, KENNETH JAYSON ANDAL
160 BALAUAG, CHRISTOPHER CARAM
161 BALAWEN, JULIUS AGUIGUID
162 BALBOA, LESTER YULO
163 BALDECAÑAS, FORTUNATO ABONG
164 BALDOMERO, ROQUE DELA ROSA
165 BALGOS, MYAN MANCE
166 BALINTONG, ROSALINA BOBARES
167 BALISI, VIRGILIO JR BUTAY
168 BALLETA, GREGORIO JR MONTEJO
169 BALMADRID, JOHN ANDREW TACORDA
170 BALMES, IAN JASON MAYOR
171 BALUYUT, PAUL BENJIE SAMBAT
172 BALVERDE, RUEL GARCIA
173 BANATE, DEXTER SISON
174 BANDA, CRISOSTOMO JR GESMUNDO
175 BANDIBAS, KRISTINE CARMELLE OLARTE
176 BANDIOLA, DIOSEPHER JR BOMALAY
177 BANGAHON, IVY ALIVIO
178 BANGUG, SALVADOR JR MARAMAG
179 BAQUIRAN, MICHELLE TAGUBA
180 BARBOSA, JOSE SERVACIO BELENO
181 BARCENA, JULIUS PETERSON CADIZ
182 BARENG, EDSAINT MARC LICYAYO
183 BARIA, EROLL MARLO AFABLE
184 BARQUIN, IAN TED MOLABOLA
185 BARRAMEDA, DIVINA FRANCIA TEODORICO
186 BARRERA, JELYN REBOLLOS
187 BARRIOS, BANISARD CORDITA
188 BARRIOS, REEMAN VILLAR
189 BARTOLOME, ALBERT CAALIM
190 BARTOLOME, DANIEL ORTEGA
191 BARTOLOME, GAY LORD AGUILAR
192 BASANGAN, ALEXIS SYLVESTER ECHALAR
193 BASAR, SHYFUDEN USMAN
194 BASAS, ARMANDO TADENA
195 BASBAS, BERNARD PHILIP HUFANA
196 BASILAN, BERMON GUMPAL
197 BATANG, RICHARD UY
198 BATTUNG, JOYCE MARIE TURINGAN
199 BAUTISTA, HERMINIO ELVIR JR BUENCAMINO
200 BAUTISTA, NORMAN SANTOS
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 6 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
201 BAUTISTA, RYAN DE VERA
202 BAWAAN, FRENZEL SIBAYAN
203 BAWING, HARRY AP-APID
204 BAYGAN, CRISTOPHER CALAM
205 BAYONA, SAMMY CATEDRAL
206 BELLEZA, JAY ANN COMPUESTO
207 BENDAL, MANUEL JR MURCHANTE
208 BENGAN, RAMIE LLOYD CAOILE
209 BEREÑA, MARVIN TUPAZ
210 BERGONIA, RIO CARLO INSORIO
211 BERMEJO, BILLY RAY CAFE
212 BERMEJO, JAY JOSEPH BACAY
213 BERMEJO, JOSEPH VINCENT COBALLES
214 BERNABEO, BERNARD MAWILI
215 BERNAL, MEADE BELLE RAMOS
216 BERNARDO, JOANA MARIE FABIAN
217 BERNARDO, RHEYMOND ALVAREZ
218 BERSAMINA, JUAN PAULO LABONG
219 BERTULFO, IAN BAGTINDON
220 BESANA, GARRY LOMOTOS
221 BESINGA, VINA VANESSA BALAIS
222 BETITA, JOSE MARIA ALVAREZ
223 BETONIO, JIMSON ESPINOZA
224 BIALA, ROMMEL DELUNA
225 BIANTAN, AIRENE HOPE PACIFICAR
226 BIDO, JONATHAN TOBES
227 BINLAYAN, FEDLYN HINNANG
228 BIOLANGO, JEFFREY GUANCO
229 BLAZA, ZYAN IRIZ MARIANO
230 BOGNOT, KAREN DUNGCA
231 BOLOGA, ELBERT JOHN LEAÑO
232 BOLOTAOLO, EDGAR OLAER
233 BOMPAT, MARIA THERESA MANABAT
234 BONCAVIL, MELISSA FRANCO
235 BONDACO, MAC KENLY FAUSTINO
236 BONDAD, JONATHAN ONERA
237 BONIFACIO, VLADIMIR HERNANDEZ
238 BORJA, MARTY LUMACTOD
239 BORLAGDAN, ROSARIO-SALOME VALENCIA
240 BORRE, ANDREA BARBA
241 BOSE, HERMO ANTHONY BAUTISTA
242 BOTONA, HANZEL TOLDO
243 BRANDES, MILEEN CATINDIG
244 BRANZUELA, ARNEL AGRAVANTE
245 BRAVO, SER ANTHONY NOCASA
246 BRIOL, JAYSON TAN
247 BRIONES, ROCELYN BAUTISTA
248 BUAN, JOSEPH ALPHONSE LACSAMANA
249 BUDO, GEORGE MICHAEL TABAY
250 BUDUAN, PAUL MICHAEL MALASIG
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 7 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
251 BUENA, IVANHOE RAY ESPLANA
252 BUENAOBRA, JOY PEREZ
253 BUENAVISTA, NATASHA EUNICE MAÑOSCA
254 BUENVIAJE, CHARLES REGINALD CALALUAN
255 BUFETE, ALVIN RAZON
256 BUGAIS, JOVENNE ALMOSA
257 BULFANE, CINDY HINALINAN
258 BULORON, CRISTOPHER ALEXIS CATAYLO
259 BUMIDANG, JANICE JOYCE BUYAYO
260 BUNAG, REDEN GUMARAC
261 BUNDALIAN, ALAN BARON
262 BURCE, CHARLYN BUENO
263 BURLASA, RYAN OBONGEN
264 BUSCAS, RENCIS VICENTE
265 BUSTAMANTE, JEFFREY BERAS
266 BUSTILLOS, RICARDO JR PABUNAN
267 BUTAYA, JERANIE VILLEGAS
268 BUTENG, MARK LAYABAN
269 BUYAGAN, MURPHY AYYAWAN
270 CABABAT, ANTONIO JR MADAYAG
271 CABADING, ALLEN JAMES BAUTISTA
272 CABAEL, NIFJAN FLOSA
273 CABALAR, PATRICK MUNAR
274 CABALLERO, LIMUEL LEODONES
275 CABALLES, RANDY ALMONTERO
276 CABARGA, JAYSON SIBONGA
277 CABEL, KARLO TORRES
278 CABELLO, JEREMY RACHELLE PALOR
279 CABOCAN, DEXTER TAMAYAO
280 CABOS, FRANCEL ABLETES
281 CABRAL, MAYBELOUISE ANNE SALENGA
282 CABRERA, ROSEMARIE CASTILLO
283 CABREROS, KALVIN SAN GABRIEL
284 CABUGAO, ROALD JASON QUIROS
285 CABUHAT, PHILIP VELARDE
286 CABULONG, LORVILLE TUBIG
287 CABUSAS, ARGIE ASAYAS
288 CACAYAN, RALEIGH WAYNE PALENCIA
289 CACDAC, EDISON FLORA
290 CADA, CHRISTIAN ELLOSO
291 CADATAL, MICHAEL MOJICA
292 CADILENA, LAMBERT MOLINA
293 CADIZ, JHESON REGANIAN
294 CADORNA, GEIL ANNE SIBAYAN
295 CAGA-ANAN, JOE BEN FLORES
296 CAGAS, JULIUS EDISON AMPARO
297 CAGUINGIN, MARJORIE MAGPAYO
298 CAGUITLA, ROLLIE TESNADO
299 CAIDET, MELVIN BALASABAS
300 CAJANO, GIRLIE SERDAN
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 8 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
301 CAJAYON, GODFREY BRYAN SEROJE
302 CAJES, CHARLESFORD PASCUAL
303 CALACAR, JOHNVER CABUGSA
304 CALANDRIA, RICHELLE DELA TORRE
305 CALARA, EDMON TORRES
306 CALDERON, CARL LAURENCE DAYAG
307 CALICDAN, ANNA LIZA CERDONIO
308 CALIPUSAN, CLIFFORD ABAPO
309 CALIPUSAN, ROMMY FERNANDEZ
310 CALIXTO, JAQUILYN CONTES
311 CALLEJA, JALERMINE EVIE MILANO
312 CALPAHI, JIL DUPINGAY
313 CALSADO, MICHAEL BERDOS
314 CAMARINES, ARIANNE JOY ISIDORO
315 CAMASA, MICHAEL ESCANA
316 CAMPOS, RICO ROMBAOA
317 CANAL, CHERRY ANN MARIANO
318 CANAPI, JESUS JR ABAOAG
319 CANCERAN, PATRICK BABARAN
320 CANDELARIA, ALLAN CASTILLA
321 CANIVEL, ARVY SICAT
322 CANLAS, ALVIN MACALINO
323 CANLAS, CLOYD MARK AQUINO
324 CANLAS, JOHN KENNEDY RODRIGUEZ
325 CANLAS, JOY DAMPIL
326 CANLAS, ROGER SANCHEZ
327 CANO, NOEL SALCEDA
328 CANO, PAOLO MIGUEL PIZARRO
329 CANONERO, MARIEL DAVID
330 CANUTO, JAYSON BERCASIO
331 CAPANGPANGAN, RYAN GARADO
332 CAPE, ARGIE CODILLA
333 CAPITO, EMMIE LOU PAHALLA
334 CAPUCHINO, MARICON MODALES
335 CARABALLO, WILMA DOMOGMA
336 CARDIJON, DEXTER TAPALLA
337 CARIÑO, JERUSALEM ABUAN
338 CARLOS, CAROLYN TEQUILLO
339 CARLOS, JOHN CHRISTIAN TAYAG
340 CARREON, MARICRIS HERNANDEZ
341 CARREON, RAYMOND CORTEZ
342 CARRIEDO, JEANTIAN KATHLYN VILLANUEVA
343 CAS, EDISON II AWA
344 CASELA, MON JEROME GAT-EB
345 CASIANO, RODMAR SORIA
346 CASPE, MARK JELIUS CACHO
347 CASTANEDA, BENJAMIN JR TERRADO
348 CASTEJON, MARK JOERIC REPAYO
349 CASTIDAD, MARCHEL SORALLO
350 CASTIGADOR, ANDRIAN RAMONES
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 9 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
351 CASTILLANO, PHILIP JOHN PASION
352 CASTILLO, EFREN LABOGEN
353 CASTOR, WILMAR PAGAPULAN
354 CAUILAN, ESVIMY DELIQUEÑA
355 CAUNCA, ERVIE JUMBAS
356 CAVANIS, JOHNER DEQUERO
357 CAVIZO, EDWARD ALBERT CASTILLEJOS
358 CAWIS, BRAILLE ALUYEN
359 CAYETANO, LIEZEL DELA CRUZ
360 CAÑAVERAS, JULIUS PASCUA
361 CAÑETE, JONATHAN RAMOS
362 CELERES, LYNITH AMORA
363 CELESTE, OLIVER TERUEL
364 CEPE, CLARK NEON II PLANDES
365 CHAN, MELCHOR GATMAITAN
366 CHAVEZ, MARK JAYSON SUNGA
367 CHENG, WILLY TRIGUEROS
368 CHOYCAWEN, ANDREW JR LACBAWAN
369 CHUA, CHERRYL NARES
370 CHUA, ROMMEL MESA
371 CHUA, RUDOLPH AARON DALMACIO
372 CIMAGALA, JEFFREY PILOTON
373 CLAMAÑA, BHEVERLY MARANAN
374 CLIMACO, JENILE SALEM
375 CLIMACO, LOUWIE JAY ALARCON
376 CLUA, JHEROL LUSTERIO
377 COBCOBO, JOHNNY ALCIDO
378 COBRADOR, GOLEM ROSATACE
379 COLLADO, MARIA BENEDICTA GUERRERO
380 COLOMA, RHOMMEL DE LOS SANTOS
381 COMENDADOR, JAN CLAUDETTE CALAMBA
382 CONCORDIA, MICIELLE GRACE MIRANDA
383 CONDES, ZARINA WINES
384 CONSTANTINO, ELLEN JOY MARUZZO
385 CONTEMPLACION, ELMOR JR SUIZA
386 CONTIC, SATURNINO BACDOYAN
387 CONZAGA, MENZHIEL GONZALES
388 COPE, JOHN FRANCIS MARIÑAS
389 CORDOBA, SENEN JR GANNOD
390 CORDOVA, MARY JANE MANZANO
391 CORDOVA, NOBEL JULAG-AY
392 CORNEL, DANILO BOLIMA
393 CORTEZ, ERICSON SANCHEZ
394 CORTEZ, JEFFREY GUERRERO
395 COSME, JAN RONELY BANOT
396 COSTALES, CHRISTOPHER BUYAGAWAN
397 CRUZ, AARON CARVAJAL
398 CRUZ, ARTHUR CUNANAN
399 CRUZ, DEANE GRACE PINEDA
400 CRUZ, DENIS JERIC BUGARIN
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 10 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
401 CRUZ, FREDERICK LINSANGAN
402 CRUZ, JOHN LESTER ELEQUIN
403 CRUZ, MABELLE LYNN SAN PEDRO
404 CRUZ, NOAH BLAS
405 CUDAL, LYNDEN MADAMBA
406 CULLA, DONNA MAY TORRES
407 CULUBONG, ELLA CHARISSE ORDOÑA
408 CUNANAN, RAY-ANN LAGRIMAS
409 CUNTAPAY, MARK JOSEPH GARCIA
410 CUSI, KRISA ROQUE
411 DAAROL, RAFAEL BUCONG
412 DACANAY, HEDLEY VALERA
413 DACORO, GERALD PERLORA
414 DACQUEL, ROSARIO DUMAGAY
415 DADA, MARY GRACE MANGLAL-LAN
416 DADIVAS, REMAR QUILANTANG
417 DAGAMAC, AHMAD MARILLA
418 DAGUIO, JOSEPH JR TICHAP
419 DALA, GERALD PAUL CAPONES
420 DAMONG, MARSHAL ADANG
421 DANAO, MELVIN ANAS
422 DANDAY, ALIX DOMINIQUE GARCIA
423 DANGANAN, ANTHONY CANLAS
424 DANGLACRUZ, ROWELL SISON
425 DANILA, RICHARD REYES
426 DAPIAWEN, ALDWIN LUTO
427 DAQUIADO, NEIL FRANCIS PEPITO
428 DARANDAS, HASSAN ELESTERIO
429 DATUKON, RN RASHID DILANGALEN
430 DAUGDAUG, BENJAMEN JR GERONDA
431 DAVAD, ARIEL AMISTOSO
432 DAVID, CHARLIE GAIL DEL CARMEN
433 DAVID, GERARD FRANCISCO
434 DAVID, HARRY BATO
435 DAVID, JHONARD MARQUEZ
436 DAVID, MARKWINN LACAR
437 DAVID, PETERPYM DELA CRUZ
438 DAVIS, ANGELA RENEE BAS
439 DAYOT, JERSON MAPANG
440 DE CELIS, MAECHEL MARQUEZ
441 DE GUZMAN, ANTHONY DENNIS VIADO
442 DE GUZMAN, MITCHEL FLORES
443 DE GUZMAN, ROGIE MANALO
444 DE GUZMAN, SHEIN JOSEPH GAITE
445 DE JESUS, MARLON SALENGA
446 DE LA CRUZ, CLAIRE DUCAY
447 DE LA CRUZ, DYAN GULPANE
448 DE LEON, JUAN PAULO TRINIDAD
449 DE LEON, MA KRESA NIRIIS GARCIA
450 DE LEON, MARIA ELIZABETH SILVESTRE
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 11 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
451 DE MANUEL, MICHAEL DONE SABINO
452 DE OLAZO, JAN-ALAIN HILARIO
453 DE ROXAS, ANNALYN CORTEZ
454 DEL MUNDO, ANNA MARIE MERCADO
455 DEL MUNDO, MEL EDWARD ADELAN
456 DEL ROSARIO, CHESTER YANGA
457 DEL ROSARIO, MARIE CARTEL BALAJADIA
458 DELA CRUZ, ALDRIN VIZON
459 DELA CRUZ, ANTHONY ABEL
460 DELA CRUZ, DAISYRE VALERIO
461 DELA CRUZ, JAY-R MARIANO
462 DELA CRUZ, JERWIN ROSAL
463 DELA CRUZ, LUIS TOLENTINO
464 DELA CRUZ, MARY ANN DELA CRUZ
465 DELA CRUZ, NOMERSON AGRA
466 DELA CRUZ, REYNALDO CRUZ
467 DELA CUESTA, MARIA ANA GASCON
468 DELA PEÑA, FRANCISCO JR SEBIDO
469 DELA PEÑA, RYAN DELA ROSA
470 DELFIN, LILLY ANN SAMSON
471 DELIGERO, MELCHISEDECH SALVA
472 DELIGERO, MICHELLE YBAÑEZ
473 DELIMA, DAN CARLO TABLANTE
474 DELLEJERO, JOHN KEVIN CUARTO
475 DEMAFILES, CLARENCE GARGOLLO
476 DEOCAREZA, JENNYLYN CASABA
477 DERIJE, SHARIBEL ABADILLA
478 DESCANZO, ARIS QUIBUYEN
479 DETERA, DANTE IAN MOSO
480 DIALA, MENDY ALVIZ
481 DIANITO, ABETH YLANAN
482 DIAZ, MARCONIE UMIPIG
483 DICEN, DHALIE ESCUADRO
484 DICHOSO, SHIRLEY JUDITH TATUALLA
485 DILLERA, ALFONSO JUAN YAP
486 DIMABUYO, ROSSANA RELUCIO
487 DIMAFILES, JERWIN DABU
488 DIMALANTA, ANNA MARIE GUERZON
489 DIMAUNAHAN, JOHN ERWIN SUBIDA
490 DIMLA, MANUELITO CUNAN
491 DINGLASAN, CHARLIE GELERA
492 DIONES, GILBERT TAMBA
493 DISPULO, JOYCE ANIEL
494 DIWA, ADONNA LUCKIE ROMERO
495 DOLORES, BRYAN AMORIE ASCANO
496 DOMINGO, MARK VINCENT ALARCON
497 DOMINGO, REYMON MANTAL
498 DOMINGO, REYMOND BRIZ
499 DOROPAN, YOLYBETH MADRIGAL
500 DOÑOS, DEO ACODESIN
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 12 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
501 DULAY, JOEL ACIERTO
502 DULFO, LUZ CONSUELO ANOS
503 DUMALI, LODIMER RAMOS
504 DUPILAS, OSWALD MARCELO
505 EBAJO, JONATHAN TAGALOG
506 ECLARINO, DOUGLAS II NAPAGAL
507 ECLEO, RONNAFEL FENIZA
508 EDILLOR, MARK VINCENT SODUSTA
509 EFREN, MICHELLE ANGELA PARADO
510 EGADNA, RACHEL LUNAG
511 ELCULLADA, RYAN JAY FEROL
512 ELEVADO, GERALD VERDIN
513 ELIO, VICENTE DE PAUL MACALE
514 ELORDE, RICHARD DOCTOR
515 ELPEDES, MARISTELA OBIS
516 EMPAMANO, JONATHAN OAÑA
517 ENCISA, JOSEL JR BONDOC
518 ENDRACA, ANSELMO JR TONGSON
519 ENOJO, EVELYN OLIS
520 ENTENDEZ, BREX YUTICO
521 ESCANDER, ABDEL JHUNALEX ARINDIG
522 ESCAÑO, BENJAMIN JR AQUINO
523 ESCONDE, WINMARK MANALOTO
524 ESMAEL, NORAISA PENDI
525 ESPAYOS, BOLANDA GARCIA
526 ESPAÑA, KRISTINE DEBB PAMA
527 ESPAÑOL, KARLO JOY ORPIANA
528 ESPAÑOL, PAUL WARREN PACULDO
529 ESPINA, EMMANUEL CARILIMAN
530 ESPINA, RASTY JUMAWAN
531 ESPINOSA, DANNY MAGALLON
532 ESPINOSA, KRISTIAN DELA TORRE
533 ESPLANA, MARISSA CLUTARIO
534 ESTEBAN, MICHELLE LOPEZ
535 ESTIMADA, REYNALDO BAUTISTA
536 ESTOESTA, MICHAEL RONALD DIVINA
537 ESTOLAS, NORMAN CARBONELL
538 ESTORNINOS, RONALD ARIOLA
539 ESTOSE, JOSHUA SOLANA
540 ESTRELLA, ERNESTO JR ARANA
541 ESTRELLA, GABRIEL ANDREW DE VERA
542 ESTRELLA, JOSEPH ELBERT DE GUZMAN
543 ETCUBAN, RIO REZIN JUMAWAN
544 EUGENIO, FROILAN LORENZO
545 EUGENIO, KATHERINE JOYCE IGNACIO
546 EVA, ANALYN PLACER
547 EVARISTO, TRISTAN JOHN QUIZON
548 EYA, ALEXANDER BATO
549 EÑIGO, JUELYN JUMAWAN
Seq. No. N a m e
551 FABITO, BERNARD TOLENTINO
552 FAJEL, ERNIE MORADA
553 FALCESO, MARLON FABELLA
554 FALCUTILA, LAUREANO III FORCA
555 FALLA, CHRIS BAJADA
556 FALLEGA, RICHARD DOCTOLERO
557 FAMISAN, ROSEMARIE DAMASO
558 FAROL, GRACE MANAGDAG
559 FAUNILLO, ARIEL CASARIA
560 FAUSTINO, ARVIN VALERA
561 FAUSTINO, FRANGIE GALANG
562 FEGCAN, ROSALIE GASGA
563 FELIZARDO, SOLOMON VALDERAMA
564 FERRER, ALEX GATCHALIAN
565 FERRER, NORMAN ECHON
566 FETALVER, JAKE DULCE
567 FILLOMENA, SHIERWIN INOCENTE
568 FLORES, GINALYN BARBASO
569 FLORES, GLENMER LACAP
570 FLORES, SHERWYN MARTOS
571 FLORES, XERXES KYLE PABLO
572 FORTES, ALEXANDER JOHN CLEMENTE
573 FRANCIA, JERWIN PRUDENTE
574 FRANCISCO, ALEXANDER TABLADA
575 FRANCISCO, ELIZABETH CANASA
576 FRANCISCO, MANILYN NAPALCRUZ
577 FRIVALDO, AZUL NUÑEZ
578 FRUELDA, ERIC DALISAY
579 FUENTES, CHRISTINE MAE MOISES
580 FULLON, RUEL SALUBRE
581 GA-A, IAN LUGATIMAN
582 GA-AS, GILMHER ARMEJE
583 GAA, GAERLAN GENER
584 GABINETE, JOHN MICHAEL RADOC
585 GACOSCOS, RANDEE PETTEN
586 GADON, MAURICE JR LIM
587 GALAN, MARIANNE LILLO
588 GALANG, CARL VINCENT CHUA
589 GALAY, MARIANNE LLANES
590 GALDONES, DAUPHINE ANGELI CALIBUSO
591 GALLOGO, JIMPOLL ANDRES
592 GALVEZ, LOVELY RACEL MANLAPIG
593 GAMBONG, MARY JESAFE POSTRERO
594 GAMUEDA, JOEBERT GERVACIO
595 GANTIOQUE, PAULA KRISTINA MAMURI
596 GARBIN, FLOBIN FLORES
597 GARCES, LEOPOLDO JR BELLO
598 GARCIA, ARNEL II ARELLANO
599 GARCIA, ERNESTO JR LAUDIT
600 GARCIA, MARCELO GIRON
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 14 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
601 GARCIA, MELVIN PAUL CAPILI
602 GARCIA, RENEBOY MARCIAL
603 GARCIANO, JOSEPH IAN COJAMCO
604 GARDAYA, CHRISTIAN CORPUZ
605 GARONIA, ROY LABAGUIS
606 GASPAR, MICHAEL SALAMAT
607 GATBONTON, MARLON CALMA
608 GATBONTON, RUTH HANNA DEL ROSARIO
609 GATCHALIAN, RHYS CRUZ
610 GATILA, JESSIE TENERIFE
611 GATUS, ELMER SORIANO
612 GAUANG, JOVEN MARIANO
613 GAURANO, DAVID JOSHUA BALABA
614 GAVILAN, ALLEN ANTHONY ARGUELLES
615 GAYTA, CRISTINA MARIE ABAD
616 GEALOGO, LEVI EVANGELISTA
617 GELINDON, MANUELITO MARTOS
618 GENTAPA, ALLEN HANSEL VILLANUEVA
619 GEPANAYAO, GRACE CONDINO
620 GEPILANO, MA VICTORIA GOLLOSO
621 GIANAN, RONNEL BARREDO
622 GIGTENTA, JOEMAR BATILO
623 GILLES, CAROLYN DE JESUS
624 GIRON, WILLIAM MANZANILLA
625 GOLES, MARK ANTHONY TAPAL
626 GOMESERIA, MARK JUN BULAWAN
627 GONZAGA, PAUL FERNANDEZ
628 GONZALES, GENE TABIAN
629 GONZALES, JOSIE PANOPIO
630 GONZALES, MEL HARVEY ASTURIAS
631 GONZALES, REYSAN CABALLERO
632 GONZALVO, SILVESTER SAGAYAGA
633 GOTIS, HENRY JR JULATON
634 GRACILLA, JOHN ANGELO ALARILLA
635 GRADO, DONATO JR ONGCOY
636 GREGORIO, ELLAINE CARILLO
637 GUIBAO, MARIAN JEAN BARAO
638 GUIDOTE, EMMANUEL STEFANO BASKIÑAS
639 GUILAS, ROCKY GUAY
640 GUILING, ABDUL RAFFI LAWI
641 GUINITA, AL BUENAVENTURA III CATAO
642 GUINTO, JOEL LABUNG
643 HABLA, LESLIE GREFALDO
644 HADJI SUCCOR, SOKRIE LOMODAG
645 HAGOS, MARK EDISON DATO
646 HALASAN, JESSIE BAJYENTING
647 HASSAN, KAMAL ADJOK
648 HERMOSURA, HILER JR SISON
649 HERNANDEZ, DULCE SOLIS
650 HERNANDEZ, LOUI MICHAEL MALALUAN
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 15 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
651 HERNANDEZ, NECEMOVA TRINIDAD
652 HERNANDEZ, RONALD REAGAN ATIENZA
653 HERNANDEZ, RYAN EDISON ACAPULCO
654 HIDALGO, WILBERT SANTIANO
655 HILADO, MAENYLL GRACE CUEVAS
656 HILARIO, ALLAN CAMPAÑA
657 HIPE, ALYANNA POTOT
658 HONRADA, OLIVER ESTUISTA
659 IBAG, ARTEMIO BATANG-E
660 IBASCO, JOSE ANDALIS
661 IBATUAN, GIOVANNI TATAD
662 ICAWAT, ARIEL PARONE
663 IDIANG, CHERRY ROSE MARCOS
664 IGNACIO, ESTRELLA PUNO
665 ILAO, BONIFACIO ILAGAN
666 ILAO, RYAN VIVAT
667 ILUZADA, ANABEL MESANA
668 IMATONG, JAN ERLVIN OÑATE
669 IMPERIAL, GLENBERT LABRADA
670 INFANTE, JINKY CATALAN
671 INTAL, ELLEN PARCON
672 IPORAC, MARY GRACE RODRIGUEZ
673 IRINCO, GABRIEL JR LUTO
674 ISIDRO, JAYVEN REYES
675 ISMAEL, DARYL UY
676 ISRAEL, YECHIEL BATUIGAS
677 JACOB, EDMAR BALBIN
678 JACOB, JOSEPH JAZMIN
679 JACOBE, FELICIANO JR DAGAMI
680 JACOSALEM, WILMER MAGBANUA
681 JAGONIA, JOEL ANDING
682 JALLORINA, ALBERT BALAWING
683 JAMBOY, MARICILLE ARADO
684 JAMBOY, MARIFEL ARADO
685 JAMION, FARISIA FRONDA
686 JANDAYAN, BRYAN RAMIREZ
687 JANDOC, JOHN RICHARD SOLEDAD
688 JAQUECA, MARICEL LOGMAO
689 JARABATA, CHONA RUIZ
690 JARANILLA, NANCY CIRENE DORMILE
691 JARON, MARK ANTHONY BENECIRO
692 JASME, KRIS NOWELL POLO
693 JASPE, NOLE TUPAS
694 JAVINEZ, ARNEL DIONCO
695 JONSON, DANILO JR AGNER
696 JOSE, MALVIN HOMO
697 JOSON, PAULO VICENTE TRAQUEÑA
698 JOVEN, JESSIE MAGAT
699 JUCABAN, RAISSA MAE CENAL
700 JUIT, JED TORILLO
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 16 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
701 JULI, JOVEN MAYA
702 JULIAN, DIVINA PACTOL
703 JUMALON, MARLON BALILI
704 JUMAMOY, MA MICHAELA LOGROÑO
705 JUNDARINO, MARITES PALIGUTAN
707 KADA-OL, GINA PULLIS
708 KAHIL, FADZMIN JUMAANI
709 KIAT-ONG, NEIL BANTIC
710 KILAT, RICHMON BALAMBAO
711 LABIANO, REMINGTON BAYSA
712 LACEDA, MA CHRISTINA MARQUEZ
713 LAGAYA, VON PATRICK NANO
714 LAGMAN, REDELYN DELOS ANGELES
715 LAGO, ROSALIE APALE
716 LAMBERTE, DONEZZA JOY URGEL
717 LAMONTE, ROBERT NITORAL
718 LANCERAS, GRACIEL FATIMA MALIHAN
719 LAPEÑA, MARY JOSEPHINE TANGHAL
720 LAPINID, MARISSA BUNAYOG
721 LAPIRA, PATRICK GAMOS
722 LAPPAY, GLENLORD ABALOS
723 LAPUGAN, FREDDIE JR SILAYEN
724 LAPURGA, ANA BELINDA FERNANDEZ
725 LAUREOLA, WILJEIM BALATBAT
726 LAURETA, ROWELL CASCO
727 LAVEGA, EMMANUEL LACAO
728 LAZO, JOEMERIC MANAY
729 LEGASPI, JESSIE AMANTE
730 LEGASPI, MARY GRACE ALMERO
731 LEGASTE, ANA MAE ANGELES
732 LEGRIA, ROLLY ANDAM
733 LEONES, BENJIE VELORIA
734 LERION, ISMAEL GUJILDE
735 LIBAN, SHERWYN AGRAAN
736 LIBUNAO, MARK EDNOR OLTIVEROS
737 LIIS, ERAS KIRK BOCLONGAN
738 LIM, JERRY GUTLAY
739 LIM, RYAN SANTIAGO SO
740 LIMJOCO, LORAINE ANNE LUCENA
741 LIMOS, ROWENA OSORIO
742 LINGON, JOEY MAPACPAC
743 LIPATA, RONALDO BERWICO
744 LITANON, ERIK BERNARDINO
745 LITERAL, JIL SANDER JAEN
746 LLEDO, MARY MELCHA PUYAT
747 LOMOTOS, LOUIEL IAN RASONABE
748 LOQUERE, AMON REY CLAVANO
749 LORENZO, MARVIN TOLENTINO
750 LUCAS, JAN ULYSSES UMALI
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 17 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
751 LUMANLAN, RAYMUND FRANCIS DAVID
752 LUMBO, EDWIN JR OPEÑA
753 LUMEN, CHRISTIAN MAGLOCOT
754 LUNA, CHERRY MAE DORIA
755 LUSICA, ELMER AMPOLOQUIO
756 MAATA, ROMEO VILLARTA
757 MABATAN, MARC DAVIS BURGOS
758 MABEZA, CRISANTO MACALE
759 MABEZA, MERLYN OLIVA
760 MABINI, DYAN ROSS SANGALANG
761 MABISCAY, GEOVANNI PANALIGAN
762 MACA, MA AURORA FELICISIMA GATONG
763 MACADATO, EMADUDDEN MIMBANTAS
764 MACAHIG, MARIA LORDETA RELLOSA
765 MACALE, RUBEN JR TAÑA
766 MACAM, JONATHAN ALAMBRA
767 MACANDAO, DOUGLAS BOMMON-AS
768 MACAPE, JOY DOCTOLERO
769 MACARAIG, MARICEL CHUA
770 MACAUYAG, FAHAD ALI
771 MACEDA, NIMROD BACOSA
772 MACGUI-ING, BUGNOSEN BATINGWED
773 MACLANG, MA CHRISTINA GRACIA VENTURA
774 MACMAC, MELODY DENSULA
775 MACUGAY, MERYCHIE YARTE
776 MADIA, JESON CABALQUINTO
777 MADRIO, JUN MAR PAMILAR
778 MAGBANUA, HYACINTH NARCISO
779 MAGBANUA, JAN VINCENT GABUCO
780 MAGBUHOS, RAYMOND ARANZADO
781 MAGISTRADO, NIDA NACARIO
782 MAGLANTAY, MARGIE TUMACA
783 MAGLAQUI, LIMWELL LIMPIN
784 MAGLENTE, PAUL SIMON BANIEL
785 MAGLINTE, RAJED REMEGIO
786 MAGNAYE, FERNANDO LUSTERIO
787 MAGNO, KIMBERLY JOYCE MANALANSAN
788 MAGNO, RICHARD BAGCAL
789 MAGPANTAY, MA AIZA MILLARE
790 MAGTANONG, MARY ANN CANARE
791 MAJOMETANO, ALFREDO CUNA
792 MALAPIT, MONARCH JAMES RUMINGQUET
793 MALGAPO, LEROY SANTOS
794 MALIGMAT, MA GRACE CABIG
795 MALING, MICHAEL SANDUKAN
796 MALLARI, JOSEPH GOMEZ
797 MALPAL, MARK ANGELO JASA
798 MAMARIL, PHEBY BANGAHON
799 MAMPUSTI, FAITH CHERRYLE LABAY
800 MAMUCUD, AROLD AGAPITO
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 18 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
801 MANABAT, MARK ANTHONY CASTRO
802 MANANQUIL, DANIEL HUBAY
803 MANDAC, SIMEON MOTOL
804 MANDITA, LENY SELDA
805 MANGORSI, DAISY JEAN TAMBA
806 MANIS, FREEMAN TAQUED
807 MANLANGIT, AL MARTIN RULE
808 MANLANGIT, MARK JAYSON UMOTOY
809 MANOG, ALVIN JAMORA
810 MANOG, MELISSA GRECIA DELA CRUZ
811 MANTALA, MANUELITO MEAMO
812 MANUBAG, EVELIO CANTAL
813 MANUEL, MARK ANTHONY LEONES
814 MANUEL, RALPH EDWARD LOTERTE
815 MARALLAG, MARY ANGELI SERRENG
816 MARANCA, VON PAULO ABRIS
817 MARAVILLA, JOHN RON CALOPEZ
818 MARCAIDA, MANCHIE SURIGAO
819 MARCELO, ADEMAR CORPUZ
820 MARCELO, MARK ANTHONY VINTA
821 MARILAG, ELENA AILEEN BROQUEZA
822 MARMETO, RANVILLE DE GRACIA
823 MARQUEZ, AGNES MAE
824 MARQUEZ, JENNIBETH PARRONE
825 MARQUEZ, LEANDRO SOLIS
826 MARQUEZ, MENCHIE SANCHEZ
827 MARQUEZ, MIAMI CORAZON FRIAS
828 MARTIN, APRIL KRISTINE SUPINA
829 MARTINEZ, ARDEE ALVAREZ
830 MARZAN, ROBERTO JR LAURIO
831 MARZO, EDUARD CORPUZ
832 MASTURA, DATUMANDA QUEZON
833 MASTURA, SITTIE AISAH EDZA
834 MATIAS, PRINCESS AVIGALE TEMPORAS
835 MATORRES, CHARISSA DALIDA
836 MATUGUINAS, ROSEL LAPINAS
837 MATURGO, RUBEN JR MONTERO
838 MAYOR, LEEANNE LIM
839 MAÑAGO, MAE KAREEN BAHILLO
840 MEDINA, ADRIAN CARLO MIPALAR
841 MEGIA, JULIUS TIMI GATCHALIAN
842 MEJIA, JENNIFER ROGUEL
843 MEJIA, VICTOR JULIUS VIDAL
844 MEJOGUE, ANNIE PURA
845 MELECIO, SYMUND JOEL ASUNCION
846 MELU, EDDIE ESTEBAN
847 MEMBREVE, MARIA AIZA VILLA
848 MENDIETA, JAYAR VALLOYAS
849 MENDOZA, CHARLOTTE PIA
850 MENDOZA, JAN MICHAEL VIOLA
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 19 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
851 MENDOZA, JAN MICHAEL YUZON
852 MENDOZA, JANICE BANDIOLA
853 MENDOZA, LYANNE MARIE CASTAÑEDA
854 MENGULLO, RAYMUND CABANALAN
855 MERAVELES, JOYCE BRYAN DAQUIOAG
856 MERCADO, CHARIS OLILA
857 MERCADO, CLAIRE CAMSON
858 MERGILLA, JAY-R IPORAC
859 MERLUZA, AIRA SASPA
860 MERRO, JAKE HANNS GACITA
861 MESINA, JONIELA TEVES
862 MICIANO, KRISTOBER GLENN LOPE
863 MILAMBILING, JEFFRY NAMBIO
864 MILANO, ARIEL FLORDELIZ
865 MINA, JOHN MARK ARNOLDO GAERLAN
866 MIRANDA, CARLOU MANABAT
867 MIRANDA, JEAN-LESLIE PAGULAYAN
868 MISSION, MARIO HANDUMON
869 MOLINA, JOAN CAPACILLO
870 MOLINA, MARIA THERESA ANTONIO
871 MOLINO, RAYMUND CELIS
872 MONARES, RAMON JR NACARIO
873 MONES, ROSELLE CASIMINA
874 MONTEROLA, OFELIA MANILA
875 MONTERON, MILAN ABORDO
876 MONTIEL, RICHARD NILO
877 MORAL, CHRISTOPHER MAGO
878 MORALA, CAY JADULOS
879 MORALES, JADE PARSALIGAN
880 MORTEL, JENNALYN FONTANILLA
881 MUÑEZ, DJERALD ASIS
882 MUÑOZ, RANDY AQUINO
883 NABLO, ULYSSES AGUILON
884 NACALABAN, LORLIE ELSA GRANDE
885 NACARIO, INAN MARCO GLORIA
886 NACPIL, LALAINE BACANI
887 NADONZA, DENNIS POLIRAN
888 NANO, FLOR ANGELLIE AGONOY
889 NARAG, FRANCISCO JR BASSIG
890 NARAG, NELBY TALLO
891 NARVASA, JIEMBO ROCA
892 NAVALES, LUCILYN MELO
893 NAVARRO, JUSTIN CASTRO
894 NERON, NEAL RELOJ
895 NGAYA-AN, DANIEL DIWAG
896 NICDAO, JASMIN BOGNOT
897 NUEVA ESPAÑA, JOHN VARGAS
898 NUGUID, JERALBINE REMPERAS
899 NULUD, FRANCIS ONGTANGCO
901 OBOD, NEMAR MORALES
902 OBUSAN, RAFAEL II RAVIS
903 OCAMPO, EDWIN JR OLORIS
904 OGAÑA, MARK JOEL CRUZ
905 OJEDA, MA THERESA YAGUEL
906 OLIVEROS, ERWIN VITALICIO
907 OLPINDO, GENER DIRECTO
908 OMALDE, REX QUIOYO
909 OMAÑA, MICHAEL STEPHEN YACAS
910 ONG, ALLAN NELSON CASTILLO
911 ONG, GLADYS RAISA TAN
912 ONG, SUNSHINE ZARAGOZA
913 ONRUBIA, DENNIS ANTONIO MOLINA
914 OPINA, NIEVA ANGELO
915 OPRIASA, WILLIAM MORE
916 ORAA, J FRANCIS ALAIN NAVARRO
917 ORAPA, DODELON DOROY
918 ORCULLO, SHARMAINE GARCIA
919 ORILLA, RAYMOND NAGUTOM
920 ORIÑA, CHRISTOPHER NUEVAESPAÑA
921 ORQUEZA, BENITO MANGI
922 ORTEZA, ADOLFO AYTONA
923 OSMEÑA, JONATHAN NICK CO
924 OTIDA, ARNEL GAHATOR
925 OZOA, JEFFREY CINCO
926 PACUT, SHEENA MAY ORIBIA
927 PADILLA, JANICE TALLER
928 PADILLA, JOSE CARLO PACIA
929 PADILLA, RYAN REGINALDO
930 PADOLINA, JOHN PAUL JORLUCAS
931 PADUA, JULITO JR GELICAME
932 PADUL, DENNIS UBAY
933 PAET, JOHN ROMER GIMENA
934 PAGDAWAN, JERRY TOSTOS
935 PAHIMNAYAN, ALDWIN SALAZAR
936 PAISTE, NANETTE LOPEZ
937 PALMES, LORELEEN GARCIA
938 PALOMAS, NOEL SULDANO
939 PAMINE, JENEVIEVE ALIMPOLO
940 PANDUYOS, LORMA GALLA
941 PANGANIBAN, MARK JED AMADO
942 PANGCOGA, KHAMALODING ARAGASI
943 PANGILINAN, RICHARD BELTRAN
944 PANOD, FRANCIS CRISTOPHER ARIONES
945 PAPA, DARYL JOY GEREMIA
946 PARAGAS, EUGENE RODULFO
947 PARAGAS, SHEILA ANN DE GUZMAN
948 PARALEJAS, IRENE RAMILO
949 PARCE, JANINE GUAZON
950 PAREL, NEPHIL VILLALON
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 21 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
951 PARTOSA, JED MICHAEL OLAGUER
952 PARUNGAO, JEFFRY TRIBIANA
953 PARZAN, JIMMY GALITANE
954 PASCUAL, DAN MARVIN GO HO
955 PASTOR, REGIE DE LEON
956 PATAC, ESMER ALINIABON
957 PATALAY, ALQUIN ESTRELLADO
958 PATINO, PAOLO VICENTE
959 PATRICIO, JANDRICK VILLANUEVA
960 PATUN-OG, DEMOSTHENES JR SELIM
961 PAULO, BREN ATCHILES
962 PAULO, LOYD BETRANCO
963 PAURCO, LEONILO JR MOTA
964 PAVILLAR, HEINRICH ALBAÑEZ
965 PAYNO, JOMER NOTARIO
966 PAYOT, WINSTON SALAZAR
967 PAYUMO, MONICA GAVILAN
968 PEDREGOSA, GERRY SUAREZ
969 PEDRO, JEROME CRUZ
970 PELAYO, MARLON CAISIP
971 PENSOY, MARY JOY BOADO
972 PERALTA, GRACE ANN CAMBRONERO
973 PERALTA, RUSTY EDADES
974 PEREYRA, MARK CARGO
975 PEREZ, JOSEPHINE MAY SUAVERDEZ
976 PEREZ, MARK HANZEL JEBULAN
977 PERFECTO, GREGORIO JR MATEO
978 PEÑALES, RYAN GEE LAGONERO
979 PEÑAREDONDO, TOM GERARD SYLUANCIA
980 PEÑONES, PAMELA GABRILLO
981 PICCIO, JOSEPH III CAMACHO
982 PIGAO, WENDELL MARZO
983 PILLEJERA, SHERWIN LEE
984 PINEDA, MARICON COLUMNA
985 PINZA, JOANNE ESCALDERON
986 PIPICAN, FAROUK PAGLALA
987 PIÑON, MARIA CLARISA SALAZAR
988 PLATERO, MA CHARISMA SALMINAO
989 POLESTICO, JOHNALON LARETA
990 POLIWES, AYE AL-ALGEW
991 PONCE, LYDA CHRISTINE ZUÑIGA
992 PORMIDA, JAYPEE GO
993 POSADAS, ANGELO TAYO
994 PRANILLA, ARNOLD PARNASO
995 PROJELLA, EUNIL RIÑOS
996 PUBLICO, JOAN KRYSTAL TANAEL
997 PULLIDO, MICHAEL BAYANI
998 PUNAY, YOR CERNAN AQUINO
999 PUNZAL, REYLOURD SAGUN
1000 PUSON, DRETCHELL URBODA
1001 QUESEA, EDWIN NANONG
1002 QUEZON, JULIE MAE GARFIN
1003 QUIAMBAO, GIAN RONALD CANLAS
1004 QUIDAYAN, JOHN NEIL SANGAHIN
1005 QUILAO, FERDINAND BARRIENTOS
1006 QUIMSON, EDWIN ARABOS
1007 QUIOCHO, ARNEL PORTUGUESE
1008 QUIOCHO, DANILO JR BALLENA
1009 QUITALIG, JOSEPH TERRIBLE
1010 RABO, PEDRO DIVINA
1011 RACHO, GRACE JOY SITOY
1012 RACIMO, JAN MICHAEL DELA CRUZ
1013 RACINES, DENNIS PALMITOS
1014 RADOC, MARK JEORGE NICOLAS CENTENO
1015 RAGANIT, OSCAR JR TARAYAO
1016 RAGAY, JENALYN MARQUEZ
1017 RAGUINDIN, JOHNDEL BACLIG
1018 RAMBOYONG, ANTHONY EMBESTRO
1019 RAMENTO, RAYAN GALINGANA
1020 RAMILO, ALVIN CALABANO
1021 RAMIREZ, JOSIFLOR NODADO
1022 RAMIREZ, JULIUS CAESAR DUMENDEN
1023 RAMIREZ, KATHERINE ALEA
1024 RAMIREZ, SANDY UBAY
1025 RAMOS, MARY JANE REGATON
1026 RAMOS, MUSTAPHA PACAAMBUNG
1027 RAMOS, RAYMUND RALPH ZALUN
1028 RAMOS, RICHARD LOSITO
1029 RAMOS, SIEGFRED GAVARRA
1030 RAPADAS, JOEY LALUGA
1031 RAQUION, MICHAEL BALLAD
1032 REAL, LEA VILLANUEVA
1033 REANTILLO, ROMIE SIMEON
1034 REBANAL, HOBERTO JR ESCOBAR
1035 REBANAL, SALVE RIOFRIO
1036 REBUTA, REA MAE DYHINGCO
1037 RECODO, ANA BALANAY
1038 RECTO, RALPH JONNEL DE GUZMAN
1039 REDILLA, ALVIN MIRANDA
1040 REGONDOLA, ELZER LITA
1041 RELLEVE, JAYPEE REMONTE
1042 RELOX, REXTER MINGO
1043 REMO, VONN ALEXIS VALEROSO
1044 REMOLLO, KRIZCHELLE GEMENTIZA
1045 RENDON, MARY ROSE GARCIA
1046 RENOS, JEROME GAMBA
1047 REOTUTAR, JOHN LOUIE RAPADA
1048 RESPICIO, ANDRES III PALADA
1049 REYES, ARIANNE PEÑALOZA
1050 REYES, BEVERLY JANE FERNANDEZ
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 23 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
1051 REYES, LEVY ANN CORPUZ
1052 REYES, RENEE PAULETTE MAY DE VERA
1053 REYES, REX BENIAG
1054 REYES, WENSON ORTIZ
1055 REYES, WYRLO SAAVEDRA
1056 RICAFORT, HERAN RICO
1057 RICO, ROBERTO ESPAÑO
1058 RIGOS, EDUMANZANO DONIEGO
1059 RIMAS, BYRON XERXES MARCELO
1060 RINGOR, REY ALMOITE
1061 RIO, FLORITO JR REAL
1062 RIVERA, HERBERT BARAYUGA
1063 RIVERO, PAOLO DELA PAZ
1064 ROA, RUEL JAMES ALDEGUER
1065 ROBLES, JESSIE CARLO TAPEL
1066 ROCAFORT, MARK VILLALUNA
1067 RODEJO, ELMER JR TABALINA
1068 RODRIGO, ANGELA ESTRIBOR
1069 RODRIGUEZ, PETER JHON CARANDANG
1070 ROJAS, ROLAND TORZAR
1071 ROMBAOA, MC ROLLY MENDOZA
1072 ROMERO, JOENATHAN NAVARRA
1073 ROMERO, JUNEL RODRIGUEZ
1074 ROMERO, MARLYN LIBRODO
1075 ROMERO, RICHARD BRITO
1076 RONDARIS, MARK LESTHER CABUGON
1077 ROSAL, RICHARD CORPIN
1078 ROSALES, REY CATINOY
1079 ROSARIO, JUN DUMLAO
1080 ROSAS, JHONALYN DAWA
1081 ROYO, LEVIE JR LEOPOLDO
1082 RUALO, ELEANOR JEAN ANDRES
1083 RUBIO, MARLON DE MESA
1084 RUFINO, JONATHAN BERMAS
1085 SABBUN, KEITH GLENN VILLANUEVA
1086 SABITSANA, SUPREMO VICTOR DOCALLOS
1087 SABORDO, MARX ROY FLORA
1088 SAGALA, TONI RICA DE RUEDA
1089 SAGUN, JEXTER SIBAL
1090 SALANGSANG, APPLE LOPEZ
1091 SALAPONG, RENEE LEE CONSTANTINO
1092 SALAZAR, ERIC JOHN REYES
1093 SALCEDO, ERROL POTATO
1094 SALCEDO, JOAR AZORES
1095 SALDIVAR, MICHAEL AGAPITO
1096 SALERA, FAIR ROJO
1097 SALES, INDIRAH MARIE RAGASA
1098 SALES, PAULO AGUILAR
1099 SALI, AL-CAUSI LANTAKA
1100 SALIWATO, ALINAIM MAMACOL
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 24 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
1101 SALUDARES, KATHLEEN MEYETTE MAPUTOL
1102 SALUT, EDGAR JAY MILAN
1103 SALVA, MICHAEL PAROL
1104 SALVACION, MARYJO TOGORES
1105 SALVADOR, KENNETH LOZANO
1106 SALVAN, CHERYL PANGANIBAN
1107 SALVIEJO, RHODA LYN DUMRIGUE
1108 SAMANODI, FAHMI AKMAD
1109 SAMPAYAN, WINMARK JORICHELE LIMET
1110 SAMUEL, MICHELLE ASUTILLO
1111 SAN ANDRES, NERA SALANDANAN
1112 SAN FELIX, HARLEY GALONO
1113 SAN JUAN, JEFPREY PAMITTAN
1114 SANCHA, RANILLO JR ALFON
1115 SANCHEZ, DENTROY MANANGAN
1116 SANCHEZ, JIMILOR MOLLENO
1117 SANDAJAN, ELVIN MANZANERO
1118 SANDIGAN, DEBORAH GAY DE LEON
1119 SANDOVAL, AIMEE SILANG
1120 SANGALANG, KHERWIN-J BAGUIO
1121 SANGCAAN, ESTHER PEY-AG
1122 SANGUILA, HAROUN AL-JALANI PESTOLANTE
1123 SANTIAGO, JOSE MARI KRIS ZAPATERO
1124 SANTIAGO, MICHAEL CALONZO
1125 SANTIAGO, TRISTAN JAMES BAMBALAN
1126 SANTOS, AIZA GAVINO
1127 SANTOS, JAY RYAN RIVERA
1128 SANTOS, JOCELYN MALIG
1129 SANTOS, JUAN BERNARDO DE LEON
1130 SANTUYO, MELODY AQUIATAN
1131 SAPORNA, JEMMAR SOTTO
1132 SAPUNGAN, LAURENCE PALOMARES
1133 SARDA, HARVEY SINTOS
1134 SARDOMA, DINAH VILLALON
1135 SARIP, JAFAR LALUNA
1136 SARMIENTO, DARRELLE MEDL CRUZ
1137 SARMIENTO, JOSIE AGUILAR
1138 SARMIENTO, LOUIE ARCILLA
1139 SARROSA, KIM LIMBAGA
1140 SATURNINO, MARK JOSEPH ISLA
1141 SAULONG, HERMES JR TADIA
1142 SAUQUILLO, SHARA DE GUZMAN
1143 SAW, KATHRYN CAROL ARDENASO
1144 SAWEY, REDENTOR NAHAUL
1145 SEBUA, ARC RAY NADELA
1146 SECO, KRYSTAL JANE ORONOS
1147 SEDURIFA, REY HESSON NACUA
1148 SEGURA, JOHN FRITZCHEL OLMEDO
1149 SENSIS, MELCHOR JAMERO
1150 SEPRADO, JERICO SANTIAGO
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 25 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
1151 SERAFINA, FRANCIS DERLAN BLAZO
1152 SEREVILLA, MAE JOY PADILLA
1153 SERONDO, NEWTON FERRANDO
1154 SERRANO, NORBELITO JAVIER
1155 SERRANO, RECTO III BACANI
1156 SESICAN, YURIY JOSE BERMEJO
1157 SEÑASE, ERROL LUCENDA
1158 SEÑOLAY, MICHAEL JOHN SUSTIGUER
1159 SHIONG SHU, CLEO LASQUITE
1160 SIA, ABNER LOU ESPINAS
1161 SIBONGA, HAYZON JOHN SALES
1162 SIBUG, MARIEL SILVANO
1163 SICAT, LEINDJIEL ESTEBAN
1164 SIERRA, CYNDEE DURANTE
1165 SILLA, LEONIE RUBINO
1166 SIMON, SEAN PHILIP ZABALA
1167 SING, JONA YABO
1168 SISON, RON JASON TUTAAN
1169 SITJAR, ROMIELOU NERVIOL
1170 SOBREPEÑA, AIZA LOZANO
1171 SOLANO, ROMMEL BUFI
1172 SOLEYBAR, RUBEN JR MAGDARAOG
1173 SOLIMAN, MAYSON CULALA
1174 SOLITO, FREDERICK SERDEÑA
1175 SONSONA, ANALIE TAN
1176 SOTTO, JUNDALE PAGLINAWAN
1177 SOTTO, ROBIN CANLAS
1178 SOURIBIO, CAROLINE LANCIOLA
1179 STA ANA, JARRIZ PENDRE
1180 STA ANA, LIBERATO RIVERA
1181 STA INES, HENRY JR CUSTODIO
1182 SUAREZ, ANTHONY MARTIN DONALDO
1183 SUBANG, KRYZEL APDIAN
1184 SUBINGSUBING, JERSON RABUTIN
1185 SUDARIA, JOLLY ARANDA
1186 SUMARIA, EDGARDO JR MONTEPIO
1187 SUN, AILEEN MAY FUTALAN
1188 SUNGGOD, KHALID FERRER
1189 SUSA, ANDY TABULINAR
1190 SUSON, LOWILYN PALMARES
1191 SY, KRISTOFER BRYAN AREVALO
1192 SY, MARIA SIMEULLE MANAYA
1193 SYIACO, BON KIMBER TEE
1194 TABAO, ABDULNASSER ALONTO
1195 TABAO-ICAN, LEVI HOPE COCOY
1196 TABARANZA, DINAH FE BURCA
1197 TABRILLA, AILA PARAGAS
1198 TABUGAN, FERDINAND IBARRA
1199 TABUZO, SAMUEL II SAN ANDRES
1200 TADAL, ARIEL REDONDO
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 26 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
1201 TAGARINO, KASHMIR ZAPATA
1202 TAGAVILLA, CATALINA KLARISSA MAE PERALTA
1203 TAGORIO, MICHAEL RAMOS
1204 TAGUINOD, PEDRO JR SABBAN
1205 TAKINAN, JENNIFER BINWAG
1206 TALLO, ERIN GAY OLARTE
1207 TALLUD, LEO JR TAGUINOD
1208 TAMARAY, MANUEL CASIBANG
1209 TAMAYO, GLENN GIL DAVID
1210 TAMESIS, JERWIN HAROLD SANDOVAL
1211 TAMMA, JOHNYSON NIÑO
1212 TAMSI, HARRIS ROMERO
1213 TAN, JASPER YU
1214 TAN, MICHAEL STEPHANIE DONATO
1215 TANAEL, JULIUS ROGEN NAZ
1216 TANIAJURA, MARK UWE URBANO
1217 TAPALLA, ANDREA MAE RACQUEL METUCUA
1218 TAPALLA, ARTHUR JR VILLUDREZ
1219 TAPAR, ARIEL VILLAREY
1220 TAPAS, GENIEWHIN BAGADIONG
1221 TAPIADOR, JENESIS MANDAL
1222 TAPOC, MARK IVANIEL CABASA
1223 TARREGA, CHITO TAÑADA
1224 TARUN, RICHARD PAGULAYAN
1225 TATOY, GENIE SUSON
1226 TEJEDO, JUNDEE MAR BONAGUA
1227 TEJONES, EMILLE ACE DUMLAO
1228 TEMBLADOR, JEFFERSON ALOJADO
1229 TEMPLO, JOEL JR ROJAS
1230 TEOPE, JULIE ANDREA BUBAN
1231 TERCENIO, ARNOLD JOVEN
1232 TERESA, ROBBY VILLAMAYOR
1233 TERRAGO, JOCELYN TRESVALLES
1234 TEVES, JEREMY REA DIZON
1235 TIBON, MIKHAIL JOSEPH VELMONTE
1236 TIDOR, RITZGOLD LUNA
1237 TINGCAWA, WELMER CADAGO
1238 TINIO, RIENA LYN DOLOR
1239 TOLENTINO, LOVELLE KRISTINE DAVID
1240 TOLENTINO, OSMUNDO DUMLAO
1241 TOLENTINO, RYAN VOLTAIRE GENITA
1242 TOLOSA, WILLIAM MICHAEL HIZON
1243 TOMANENG, DENNIS ILAR
1244 TOMAS, ERNESTO JR GARABILLO
1245 TOMINO, JAYSON TAMBIK
1246 TONIDO, ETHEL DE SAN MIGUEL
1247 TORDIL, FREDERICK ARNEJO
1248 TORREGOZA, RAYMOND RODRIGUEZ
1249 TORRES, MA BERNA HERVIAS
1250 TRIA, ROMMEL BETANSOS
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 27 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
1251 TRIPOLCA, JOCELYN ANDIS
1252 TUAZON, EDMUND MADRID
1253 TUBALLAS, RAFAEL ESTERNON
1254 TUBANG, SHELLA MIE SOLANO
1255 TUGBO, RICHARD CANTORIA
1256 TUMANENG, ROWELL ABAYA
1257 TUPLANO, IVY LYNDELL PANTI
1258 TURIN, AUGUSTUS ABRIL URNIETA
1259 TUSCANO, GLENN CARGANILLA
1260 UBEDA, RICA JOY MASONGSONG
1261 UGOKAN, NUR HAMEN BASAG
1262 ULTRA, ZYRA DELA CRUZ
1263 UMPA, JAHARA JOVEN
1264 UNIDAD, JEAN ROSS INAMAC
1265 UNTALAN, SHERYL MARIE JUNIO
1266 UNTALAN, WEYNARD JOSEPH PEREZ
1267 URBANO, ELIZABETH BUNGUBUNG
1268 USMAN, ABDULKHALID DIMACALING
1269 UY, ANNE LORRAINE CORONACION
1270 UY, JASON PRESENTE
1271 UY, RAYMUND POGARO
1272 UY, RITZY GALBAN
1273 UY, WILLIAM ANTHONY SIA
1274 VAILOCES, DIOSDADO JR BALAIS
1275 VALDEZ, APRIL ALIADO
1276 VALDEZ, EUGENE BARROGA
1277 VALDEZ, GINALYN ESTABILLO
1278 VALDEZ, JOSUE LOMBOY
1279 VALDEZ, MILLION TALATTU
1280 VALDEZ, ROGELIO JR RAL
1281 VALENZUELA, AUBREY BIANZON
1282 VALERIANO, JENNIFER MATEO
1283 VALERIO, MARGIE SIAPNO
1284 VALERIO, MONIER DARADAR
1285 VALIN, GRETCHEN JOY UMALI
1286 VALITE, RON MICHAEL BARUT
1287 VARGAS, BERNARD MONDIA
1288 VASOL, JEFFREY BOZAR
1289 VASQUEZ, RAMON MIGUEL
1290 VECIANA, SALVADOR JR LAGRAN
1291 VECINO, ALMEL CUNTAPAY
1292 VELASCO, ELMER PAGUILIGAN
1293 VELASCO, MERVIN
1294 VELASQUEZ, DERICK PAET
1295 VERANGA, SIEGFRED JAY VERASTIGUE
1296 VERDAN, RUIZ AGUBA
1297 VICENCIO, RUBY ANN SEBASTIAN
1298 VICENIO, ROELITO PABLO
1299 VICTORINO, FRANCIS ALEMANIA
1300 VIDAD, JOHN FREDERICK IBAY
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 28 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
1301 VILLA, ALGIE BALBON
1302 VILLACARILLO, JULIUS BENITEZ
1303 VILLACERAN, VANESSA VALDERAS
1304 VILLAFLOR, JOEL BRIZ
1305 VILLAFLORES, JEE-ZALD ALCOVER
1306 VILLAMIL, WILFREDO JR CANETE
1307 VILLANUEVA, JOAN CRISTOBAL
1308 VILLANUEVA, JOSEPH VICTOLERO
1309 VILLANUEVA, RICHARD ALLEN MANGULABNAN
1310 VILLANUEVA, SHERYL ROSE CUEVAS
1311 VILLANUEVA, VIRGINIA OCULAR
1312 VILLAPANDO, ABIGAIL NEBRES
1313 VILLASEÑOR, JING VILLAR
1314 VILLATE, MANUEL LOUIE DEVEZA
1315 VILLEGAS, KATHERINE MAE DELOS REYES
1316 VILORIA, MENARD MARQUEZ
1317 VINCULADO, MICHAEL JOSEPH SALVADOR
1318 VINLUAN, ADONIS DELA CRUZ
1319 VINOYA, CHARLESTHON PIDUCA
1320 VIRAY, MARK ROLDAN ROBLES
1321 VITAL, JOSE ROY TORGA
1322 VITUG, ALDEN SIBUG
1323 VIVO, MARVIN ROY DELMINQUEZ
1324 WAHAB, ABDULWALI LIMUG
1325 WAMINAL, ROLAND JOSEPH SALVADOR
1326 WANAWAN, LOUIE REX ISLAO
1327 WANDAG, WALTER BALACANG
1328 WANYA, DARWIN ULEP
1329 YALONG, KRISTOFFER JAKE TAMAYO
1330 YANGGAT, MARK WILLIAM PARMEROLA
1331 YAP, GILBERT ACOSTA
1332 YAP, ROMHEL ALGABA
1333 YPARRAGUIRRE, BONIFACIO JR ANINO
1334 YUMANG, JENER LAO-ING
1335 YUNTING, RODEL JAPAY
1336 ZABALA, BENJAMIN JR SOLTES
1337 ZAMORA, JOCAS APRIL DEL ROSARIO
1338 ZAPATA, JAMES BENJAMIN BAUTISTA
1339 ZAÑO, DESIREE JOY OCAMPO
1340 ZOLETA, JEANELLEN MARAMOT
1341 ZUÑIGA, ANNA VERONICA OLIVA
1342 ZUÑIGA, JARAMIE SARMIENTO
NOTHING FOLLOWS----------------------
Manila, Philippines
JANUARY 16, 2008
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL:
ANGEL L. LAZARO III
Chairman
Board of Civil Engineering
APPROVED:
LEONOR TRIPON-ROSERO
Chairperson
480 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 1 – 200 of 480 Newer› Newest»hindi lapse ng examinees kung madali talaga ang hydro na exam. kasalanan naman ng watcher nung nahulihan ng leakage kasi hindi siya naging mahigpit sa umpisa pa lang. hindi dapat tayo ang magbabayad
PRC that's not FAIR, ang kasalanan ng 2 e hindi pwede isisi sa lahat. Paano naman yung nagpakahirap at nag-aral ng mabuti. Hindi ba kayo naaawa sa mga nagsumikap lamang na makakuha ng board exam sa malinis na paraan at proseso sa kabila ng kahirapan. Dapat ang sisihin sa nbangyari ay ang mga bantay sa 2 tao na nagdulot ng kahihiyan sa board of civil engineering ng dahil sa kanilang kasakiman dulot ng cheating.
nakaka-inis naman yan!.. nag nose bleed na ako sa mga problems! tapos, retake?!..
paano ba yan? lets coordinate kung anong hakbang ang ating gagawin..
hay! nko! sa mga pasimuno ng leakage, dyos na ang bahala sa inyo!
dapat linisin muna ng PRC ang sarili nilang bakuran. sa kanila naman galing ang leakage eh. bakit tayong examinees ang maghihirap?
For: PRC
Nais ko lamang pong iparating ang aking saloobin sa isyung leakage o nahuling nagkodigo sa CE Board.
Nangyari na po ito sa Nursing Board Exam. Bakit di pa matigil tigil ang pagleleak ng exam? Sino po ba may access sa exam? I mean sinu-sino? Board Examiners at PRC lamang po ang sa aking pagkakaalam. May napaparusahan po ba sa mga ganitong paglabag? Hindi ko po nilalahat.
Siguro po, dapat sa ahensiya po muna natin ang pagbabago.
Kawawa naman po kami na naghirap magreview. This is my third take. Hindi ako sure kung pumasa po ako. Pero mas marami akong alam ngayong exam na ito. Actually, ito na lang po ang hinihintay ko para mapromote sana ako. I always check kung meron na result, madaling araw, tanghali, gabi. Nakakdepressed po talaga.
God Bless na lang po!!!
TO PRC!!!!
lider from PRC nmn!! think of it..
d sapat n dahilan ung marami nakakuha ng mataas na score sa HYDRO, pra retake p un!!! its not our folt,, and also nde rin folt ng examineer un... aun tlg ang lumabas sa exam and nde gnun complicated ung mga question sa hydro!!! U DONT HAVE ENOUGH BASIS PRA SABHIN N RETAKE UN!!!
BOUT NMN SA STRUCTURAL SUBJ, n nahulihan nyu ung 2 fucking pipol n nag cheat or ng labas ng cellfon! ISOLATED CASE UN,,wag nyu damay lahat!!!
WAG NYU NMN UNDERESTIMATE UNG BATCH 2007 FOR HAVING A HICH SCORE!!! THATS NOT A RISON COMING FROM PROFESSIONAL LIKE PRC
there will be a retake due to "irregularities"? Malamang irregular nga ang result sa Hydrau and Design... at dahil sa kanila yun. Sobrang dali naman ng binigay sa Hydrau tapos sa Design mahirap. Syempre mababa sa Design at mataas sa Hydrau.
At yang leakage na yan, galing din naman sa kanila yang mga yan
It's sO unfair... but that's life... Good luck everyone
DONT UNDERESTIMATE US!!!!
PRC,,NG ARAL AND NAG SAKRIPISYO PO KME.. TPOS GAGANTUHIN NYU KME!!!!
DAIG NYU PA LUMALIK SA SQUATTER E,, SORI TO SAY THAT PRO IM VERY DISAPPOINTED NA!!!
DAHILA NG PRC SA PG RETAKE!!!
MADAMI NAKAKUHA NG MATATAAS NA SCORE SA HYDRO,,AT D NILA MAPANIWALAAN UN KAYA RETAKE!!!
FCUK!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
TO PRC OFFICIAL!!!
NAPAKADALI NG IBINIGAY NINYONG EXAM SA HYDRO AT GEOTECH TAPOS PAGDUDUDAHAN NYO ANG MGA NAKUHA NAMIN
kung hindi ako panganay samin ok lang sakin kung my retake, kaso 2 kapatid ko ang tumigil para mag give way sakin at mkagraduate ako, result nalang ng bord exam hnihintay ko pra mkaalis ako at mpag aral nman sila...
tpos ganyan!!!!
naiiyak ako!!!!!
KUNG TALAGANG MAY NAHULI KAYONG NAGCHEAT IPAKITA NYO!!!
BKT RETAKE DIN UNG HYDRO & GEOTECH SUBJ?.. EH KAHIT HIGH SCHOOL KAYANG SAGUTAN UN EH... KASALANAN B NAMIN N MADALI UNG MGA QUESTIONS N BNIGAY NYO?.. MAG-ISIP NGA KAU!!!
DUN NMN SA DALAWANG KUMAG N MERON CELFONE, SANA NAGISIP KAU N MERON MADADAMAY... KUNG NDI P KAU READY N MAG-EXAM SNA NDI MUNA KAU NAG-EXAM...
USIGIN SANA KAU NG KONSENSYA NYO!!!
E2 N SANA UNG INAANTAY KO N CHRISTMAS GIFT...
last yr mdaming pumasa,
mdali daw ang exam
madaming nagtop more dan 80
ngayon nadalian tyo sa hydro at design, retake?!!
yung nagcheating nalang parusahan nyo!
wag na kami! tutal nahuli nyo nman kung sino yon!
pano ang pmilya namin umasa at nagpakapod din para samin!
to anonymous:
i agree!
to prc:
kung sino man yung nahuli ninyo,ilabas nyo! sila lang parusahan nyo, wa nyo kami idamay! PRC naman may mga ank din naman kayo,magulang din naman kayo, ma-awa po kayo sa amin at sa mga magulang namin..
unang una.. i agree.. mafali ang hydro pero mali ako sa water hammer.. kasalanan ko un kung bakit di ko nasagot un.. pero ang pag retake,di ata pwede un..
ung sa design di rin pwede re take kase kasalanan yan ng watcher! kung gugustuhin kong mag cheat pwedeng pwede kase di naman sila nag iinspect ng bulsa or ng damit or lalagyan ng food ng examinees.. dapat bago pumasok eh,ini inspect nila.. kaslanan nila un.. wag i blame saten ang kakulangan ng ibang tao! bullsh*t!
Badtrip! bulok tlga sistema dito sa pinas!!!! alam natin lhat na di maaalis ang may magchecheat!meron at merong mag checheat!!!kababawan lng tlga na pa retake satin lhat!!!bat kaya di nlng suspend yung nahuli????!!!yun naman nakalagay sa mga rules nla sa mga mahuhuling magchecheat!!!!
o baka naman leakage yan!!!!dapat makasuhan ang mga taga PRC!!!di na natin kasalanan na may leakage!!!corrupt lng tlga lahat ng ahensya ng gobyerno natin!!!ngayon tayo papahirapan!!!mga bwiset kyong mga asa gobyerno!!!!nasisira integridad ng mga inosente nating kababayan!!!!
bigyan nyo ng magandang grouns para magkaroon ng retake!di ppwede na yun lng magiging basehan nyo!!!
pagkukulang nyo kami ang pinahihirapan nyo!!!
relax mga CE ang kelangan ntin now is to have our lawyer madadaan natin ito sa legal n paraan. magsamasama tau kung kelangan magdemanda magdemanda tayo. hindi nla inisip ung mga mhrap n ngtake para lang makaahon sa hrap.
NAPAKALAKING INSULTO SKIN UNG GNWA NLA S HRAP NA GNWA KO D NYO BA NARARAMDAMAN UN MGA DUDE!!
kelangan tayo magreklamo ok.
GNUGULO NLA TAYO AT PNGLALARUAN.
SA UNA PA LANG ITO NA PAKIRAMDAM KO NA HIND NILA MATANGGAP NA MARAMI PUMASA KAYA D NLA MAILABAS ANG RESULT.
normal kung may makaperfect man sa geotech saka hydro, eh pinagigihan po kasi naman ang review...pati sa design...sa hirap b nman ng buhay nkkpanghinayang ang bayad sa review.. result na lng inaantay namin lahat taz ganun lang ...retake!! wag nyo ipares ang CE sa NLE.. saka bakit ganun,antagal bago nila sabhing retake kasi may nagcheat,eh dapat that day of exam sa lugar na may nagcheat na pull out na sana ung mga taong nagcheat... hello!!!! PRC.. be considerate,ang hirap na nga lng mkapasok ng trabaho kahit board passer taz ganyan..
I am trying my best to be civilized. I am trying my best to remain calm and think logically. However, it is difficult to do the latter. Because PRC is being illogical themselves.
Hydraulic and Geotech? They can't believe that most of the board takers have gotten high marks? So? It's THEIR fault for coming up with EASY questions.
So may nag-leakage pa nga daw. Haaaay. Kung may nahuling nag-leakage, party at fault din SILA. Paanong nahayaang may cellphone yung student?! AT HIGIT SA LAHAT PAANO NA-LEAK YUNG INFO.
Why should the students be the one to cover up for their blunder?
TO ALL PCR OFFICIALS!!!
WE! THE NOVEMBER 2007 CIVIL ENGINEERING BOARD EXAMINIES,
DARE ALL OF TO SHOW US THE TWO (2) EXAMINIES YOU ARE ACCUSING COMMIT CHEATING!!!
BULLSHIT!!!
di natin masisisi yung nagcheat...dapat ang sisihin yung watcher ng PRC...isa pa wala sa rules na pag may mahuhuling magchecheat ay lhat tyo magreretake!!!!meron bang ganun prc???mga hinayupak kyo!!!ayaw nyo lng atang aminin na leakage ang nangyari at kayo ang malalaglag!!!dapat hawakan na ng NBI ang kasong ito!!!retake my ass kung ganyan ang rason nyo!!!!
guys dapat maglaunch tayo ng signature campaign para maalis na lahat sa pwesto yung mga nasa PRC, dapat they've already learned their lesson from the nursing board exam anomaly pero ano na naman ngayon. Dapat clang patalsikin sa pwesto, gumawa tayo ng letter of petition to Pres. Arroyo.
DO YOU THINK THIS WILL BE A GOOD IDEA? I THINK SO....SO LETS JOINED FORCES!!!
IMPEACHMENT IF ITS THE RIGHT TERM FOR THOSE PRC OFFICIALS. Para matakot din cla sa mga desisiyon nila na walang sense and selfish....
that's too much to bear nman. cra ng holiday ntng laht. pano yng mga taga province, wlang mga byahe kc holiday. meaning, mlayo cl s family nila just for the sake of that unfair retake.
dapat pagbyrin muna ng gobyerno yng mga ahas s PRC bgo ibling s mga naghirap n mga students. 5 years ng paghihirap, gganituhin lng ng gnun kdali!
we should all unite and make our voices heard! violated tayo ng dahil sa kakulangan ng PRC. hindi naman dapat nangyari ito kung hindi dahil sa kapabayaan nila.
dapat ilabas ng PRC yung 2 nag cheat.. tapos.. yung utong nila ipakagat sa malalaking langgam na pula.. dapat brutal ang parusa sa kanila..
Putcha!!!
Wag Na Wag Nilang Ipapakita Ung Dalawang Taong Nangcheat!! Dahil Pagnakilala Ko!! Patawarin Ako Ng Diyos Sa Magagawa Ko!!!
Putcha!!!
Wag Na Wag Nilang Ipapakita Ung Dalawang Taong Nangcheat!! Dahil Pagnakilala Ko!! Patawarin Ako Ng Diyos Sa Magagawa Ko!!!
sa mga kapwa ko retakers.. gud luck & God bless sa atin..
GUD LUCK SA MGA MAPUA CE BATCH 2001
Maybe we can do something legally. Tipong, hunger strike (kakagawa ko lang nito nung isang araw, effective)? O kaya graffiti? O kaya bomb threat? Hehe. Joke lang.
Anyway, yeah. Maybe there are legal means. Agree ako dun sa signature campaign. Pero baka may iba pang effective?
Syempre, I feel for those who have failed and are grateful for this another opportunity to make up for their shortcomings (baka nga ako bagsak e). Pero yung point dito e hinde maganda ang reason ng PRC AT HINDE NATIN KASALANAN KUNG BAKET MAY IRREGULARITIES.
wala s rule ang gnw ng PRC. they make but break their own rules. wla n tlg tyong maaasahan s bulok n Gobyerno ntn. dapt suspended yng nagcheat, thats the rule. Isa p, how about the watcher? actually, kasalanan ng watcher yn, not the examinees. dapat s knila e itinatali ang leeg s lubid tpos ibalot s sako at itapon s dagat ksama ang ahas at scorpions n tulad nila s sako para HAPI cl, d b!
Hindi sapat ang rason ng PRC para sa isang retake!!!! baka LEAKAGE sa PRC ang nangyari!!!na dapat sila ang magbayad!!!Hindi tyo!!!Baka ginagawa lng nilang scape goat ang may nagcheat!!!di sapat yung uulit tyo lhat para lng sa ilang nahuling nagcheat!!! dun naman sa hydro at geotech...di ba nila matangap na madami nakakuha nun???!!!natatapakan ba sila na may utak ang mga nagexam???!!!ginagawa nila tyong mga mang-mang!!!PRC sa registration napaka susungit nyo!!!kung umasta kyo parang di kaming mga nageexam ang bumubuhay sa inyo!!!ngayon ang desisyon nyo napaka babaw!!!ginagawa nyo kaming mga laruan nyo!!!Fuck PRC!!!
january 2 pa ang retake!!!napaka unfair!!!pati sa date unfair!!!pano naman yung mga examenees na taga province???!!!!mga lintek!!!!
Wake up men! di ito oras para magsisihan. I think deserving tong batch ninyo magretake dahil everytime na magcheck ako ng website na ito, puro kayabangan ang nakalagay. Biruin mo wala pang result kung di topnotcher ang pinaguusapan eh kung sinong school or university ang magaling. Wag sanang maoffend ung iba pero thats my observation. Di ako matalino di rin naman ako bobo. Simpleng tao
lang ako pero pinagmamalaki ko na nakapasa ako ng board examination ko na walang cheating. I proud to say na 73.33 lng ang grade ko pero fair naman. Daming CE examinee di pa man engineer mayabang na what if kung engineer na kayo di lalo kayong yayabang. Hello pare-pareho lang kayong tao di basehan kung mataas ang grade mo sa exam kung magiging successful ka sa buhay. Gawin ninyong lahat magpahinga na kayong lahat then tomorrow mag start na kayang magreview uli for january 2, 2008 re-take. I think this is PRC's final decision. Wala na kayong magagawa kahit sinong president pa ang tawagan ninyo. Good Luck na lang uli sa inyo.
kung magtake uli madali lang.
pero i feel like bastusan na ito..
kung baga parang lokohan
akala ko magkakaroon n me ng tym para makahanap ng work.snasayang nla ang tym natin.
MGA DUDE HIND KELANGAN KUNG SAN SKUL AT REVIEW CENTER TAU PARE PAREHO TAU MGA CE SUSUPORTA AKO KHIT ANO MANGYARI KUNG ANO ANG RESULT NOW UN ANG IPAKITA NILA
sure na ba yan? may official statement na ba from PRC?
nasa news na ba?
WAG TAYO PAPAUTO SA KANILA NA MERON NGA NAGCHEAT!!!E BAT NGAYON LNG NILA SINABI???NGAYON LNG NILA NAHULI YUNG NAG KADIGO?????!!!!MGA ULOL!!!GINAGAWA NYO KAMING MGA BATA!!!PALUSOT LNG NILA YUN!!!CLA ANG MAY PAGKUKULANG AT HINDI TYO!!!KAYA MGA REPAPIPS CLA ANG ANG DAPAT SISIHIN!!!WLA TLGANG NAGCHEAT!!!CLA NA SA PRC ANG MGA CHEATERS AT CORRUPT!!!WAG TYO PAPADALA SA MGA ALLIBI NYA NA MABABABAW!!!DI TYO PINANGANAK KAHAPON!!!!
I'm not surprised at all. I've been waiting for the results soon after the exam, it took some time and I thought something was wrong. And indeed there was. Personally I think this whole system is corrupt. PRC, which I think is an organization competent enough to be able to come up with an exam that is accurate and within the specified objectives that are supposed to be met by any graduate, has failed to do so. To tell the public that there were irregularities is to definitely admit that they were not doing their job in the first place. And to those who were in charged of the exam, what was it that you were supposed to do? As to what extent did you guard the sanctity of the exam? What pride do those who took the exam and will take the exams soon will have, knowing that there was bias? And to the employers, they'd always ask how competent are these graduates? And the license they hold, will it be something to brag? A few people and organizations abroad have been doubtful about how professional are the workers from the Philippines. Little by little they are losing faith.
All in all it was a waste. Families were hoping that someone in their family will be a licensed professional, engineer at that soon and that it'll be the end of their sacrifices but no. And these examinees hoping that they would be able to stand on their own soon after years at school, have heir dreams on hold and their time wasted only because of some selfish officials. Whatever happened has had a ripple effect and I sincerely hope it wont get back to....them. I do love the Philippines but something has got to change, to stop.
la n tau magawa f dat der decision...ang gawin nlng natin ay magdasal at magsipag ng mbuti s pag-aaral...Frm Lucky9
to ree2001:
wag ka naman ganyan! kung ikaw nasa lugar namin magre-retake kaba?
guys, we will hav legal action regarding this issue, madada-an naman lahat sa mabuting usapan.. i know God is with us!.. to those nagpasimuno ng leak,makonsensya naman sana kayo!
ree2001 ang galing mo magsalita....parang nilahat mo na samin na nagtake na mayayabang!!!wag ka makealam at di mo nararamdaman ang nararamdaman namin!!!!plibhasa nakalusot ka na!!!wag ka maglagay ng comment dito at marami kaming masasaktan sa mga binitiwan mo...parang nilalahat mo kme na mayayabang!
to RE2001:
please,wala kang right para sabihan kame na deserving kame mag retake.. totoo na ngayayabangan kame kung sino mag te take.. but that's natural.. we take pride sa aming Alma Mater.. at ginagawa namen ung,para aliwin ang sarili naman sa pag aantay.. kahit sino pa ang magtop na school,ok Lang naman, masaya lang na isipin na galing sa sari sarili nameng school.. kaya please kung wala ka namang sasabihin na makaka gaan ng loob namen,wag ka na mag comment..
icipin na lang natin mga magulang natin hindi lang tau ang apektado pati cla!!!
bkit kelangan pang ulitin ng PRC ang lahat ng ito.
5 years or more than a 5 years rather tayo ng aral.
PRC w8 nyo lng ang para sa inyo!!
ang CE batch 2007 ang gagawa ng paraan para mawala kayo
nagkamali kayo ng kinalaban
WE ARE MORE A FIGHTER THAN WHAT ALL U THINK!!
i really wish those somebody in position is reading
naku! pinagkakaisahan ata ang CE.. kung mgretake man, sana dun lng sa place na ngkaLEakage..
FIGTH FIGTH FIGTH!!!!...
SINO BA DAPAT PUNTAHAN NATIN PRA MA-UMPISAHAN NA NATIN ANG ATING "LEGAL ACTION" REGARDING THIS MATTER?
DI TAYO AASA SA GOV'T PARI-PARIHONG MGA CORRUPT ANG MGA YAN!
DAPAT INDEPENDENT BODY ANG MAG-INVESTIGATE REGARDING THIS MATTER!
to re200:
kung CE ka nga, dapat damayan mo kme...pero sa inaasal mo di ka tunay na CE....ikaw pa 2ng mayabang...galit ka lng sa kapwa mo mayabang...pati ibang nagexam dinamay mo pa...GOD bless nlng sa career mo at malayo ang marararating ng kayabangan mo....
d dapat retake madali ung hydro ulol ba cla at d matanggap na madami naka perfect, o kayay d nila kaya sagutan un, wake up guys no to retake, punta tau prc sa asap
d nman.. my brO dn akong ngtake.. bkt ikw? gusto mong mgRetake? kung my leakage man, sana dun nlng sa place na ngkaron ng leakage.. wag na damayin ang iba..
FIGHT FIGHT FIGHT!!!!...
(wrong spelling na, sobrang tensyonado na kasi..)
SINO BA DAPAT PUNTAHAN NATIN PRA MA-UMPISAHAN NA NATIN ANG ATING "LEGAL ACTION" REGARDING THIS MATTER?
DI TAYO AASA SA GOV'T PARI-PARIHONG MGA CORRUPT ANG MGA YAN!
DAPAT INDEPENDENT BODY ANG MAG-INVESTIGATE REGARDING THIS MATTER!
d pde retake ulul lang cla, un na nga lang reward natin mataas na score sa hydro tapos balewala lang! ulol kau prc
passed or failed show us the result maging fair naman kau oi d na kau nahiya. ala ba kau awa ha! deserve namin na mataas sa hydro!
hay naku naman!
sa mga taga crbu, tga cit ug tga padilla.. mag-kita2 ta ninyo to hav legal action regarding this matter!
"eb" ta sa emall?hehehehe
mga bro. inform me about the latest update beh? i have to log out na.. gtg 09064183599 thats my mobile no.
Mga fellow examinees, may IRREGULARITIES sa desisyon ng PRC!!! ipaglaban ntin ang pinaghirapan natin...pumasa man o hindi dapat lumabas ang totoo!!!wag tyo pumayag na paglaruan nla tyo sa kanilang pagkukulang!!!hindi convincing ang sabihin na may nahuling nagcheat!!dahil bat ngayon lng nila sasabihin...may kalokohan na nangyayari sa loob ng PRC!!!PGMA dapat imbestigahan na ang ngyayari na anomalya sa PRC dhil hinahatak nito pababa ang integridad ng mga propesyonal na pilipino...apektado tyo lhat sa corruption sa PRC!
to RI reviewees:
meet tau tomorrow sa RI ng 8.30Am para sa gagawin nateng action..
Palit anyo muna ako...sobra na
Akira Sendoh
#7 Shooting guard ryonan high
becomes
Hitokiri Gentatzu Izu
Izu Clan
Bakumatsu Turmoil
I am calling all my brothers and sisters sa CE na donate one peso each day hanggang sa masolve etong problemang ito. ang proceeds ibili natin ng missilw tapos i rent natin ang isang staellite na umiikot sa earth tapos TIRAHIN NATIN YUNG BAHAY NG HINAYUPAK NA NAG CHAEATING %&^%&^&*((&)%$_)(* na iyan!!!!!
Whoever you are I have fraternity brothers and sisters throughtout the Philippines and believe me I will hunt you down, wag lang magkakamaling ilabas identity ninyo and ull be sorry why you were born
Sobra na ang hirap na dinaanan ng baby ko sobra na!!!!!
to all my brothers and sisters sa CE Pasensya na kayo kung ganito sinasabi ko But i THINK YOU'LL UNDERSTAND....hindi nga ako nagtake ng board ngayon pero I CANT STAND TO SEE THE PERSON I LOVE IN SO MUCH AGONY!!!! TAPOS GANITO P*************NYO MGA DEMONYO WALANG KUNSENSYA!!!!!!
Lets not give up the fight my brothers, ang mali ni pedro ay hindi mali ni andres....all of you have worked so hard and you don't deserve this in any way!!!!!
PRC If you have hearts mahiya hiya naman kayo, sira na repu ninyo, dont taint it again!!!!
by the way my kilala akong al qaeda kung makumplketo pera natin bili na tayo ng missile....
Mabuhay tayong mga CE!!!!
Baby
Forever until this ends
for better or the best
Hitokiri Gentatzu izu
To REE2001:
Dude, honestly you don't belong here. Mayabang ka rin naman ha. Hindi lahat ng CE mayayabang. It's just normal. I bet may mayabang din na REE na kagaya mong mapanghusga at mataas ang ere na akala mo eh kung sinong humble.
final na ba ang decision na yan?linawin nyo nman kung magreretake nga oh kung anu oh kung paanu na gagawin nmin? ang hirap nito mag papasko pa nmn.. hindi kmi makapaghanap ng work gawa nitong delayed na results nitong exam na to tpos may retake pa! eh panu na ung may mga nasimulan ng work? kelangan ba itigil na ung trabaho nila kc kelangan na ulit mag review para d2 sa retake na hindi nman nmin kasalanan lahat kung bakit kelangang mag retake! justice nman jan! bigla na lng kau nag ddecide ng wala sa lugar... maging patas nman kau...
Mga felow CE's, final man o hindi ang decision ng PRC, start na ulit tayong magreview ASAP. Don't expect na madali na ang ibibigay ng board kung sakaling tuloy ang retake. Let's face reality but still, we should fight and be ready.
Daniel Johns my point ka pro sana man lng ilabas na ng prc kung anu ung dapat gawin natin kung panu kung saan kung anu ba ang dapat gawin ng mga mag reretake.. wala na tau magagawa kelangan tlga nating mag aral guys.. malay nyo blessing para satin tong nangyari na to... gud lak na lng sa atin lahat..
I agree estero. Maglalabas din siguro ang PRC ng guidelines na kung ano ang dapat gawin. Sana lang pwede natin malaman yung result ng math natin para alam natin kung may saysay ang retake natin o wala.
halo po sa lahat ng examinee.... talagang ang sama ng PRC kasi ang kasalan ng isa dinamay nila ang lahat................ kawawa naman kayo.........
to Daniel John and luntian at pula
Alam ko meron din mayayabang sa REE. Pero di namin yun sinasabi di katulad ng CE examinee na walang ginawa sa site na ito kundi magyabangan. Isa pa hindi natural ung magpayabangan kayo. Lintek di pa nga kayo engineer eh lintek na ang yabng ninyo. At di yan ang tamang way para aliwin ang sarili ninyo. Ngayon ninyo sabihin na naaliw kayo. Hello bat nasasaktan kayo isa ba kayo dun sa mayayabang. Tandaan ninyo di porke matalino kayo sure kayo napapasa kayo. Sa board exam, di lang mentally prepared ka, dapat spiritually din. pano kayo pakikinggan ng diyos kung wla siyang nakikitang pinagsusulat niniyo kundi puro kayabangan.
halo po sa lahat ng examinee.... talagang ang sama ng PRC kasi ang kasalan ng isa dinamay nila ang lahat................ kawawa naman kayo.........
November 27, 2007 10:05 PM
kuya ree2001, please po, tama na.
saan ba nagkaron ng eregularities......... yung location ?
I'm not buying your words Mr. REE1621. Don't distract us with your cleansing words of wisdom. Alam na namin yun. Kung ano man ang mga nakalagay dito sa site na ito, dala yun ng bugso ng damdamin dahil madami naman talagang nag-aral ng mabuti sa amin na hindi deserving na mangyari ang ganito sa kanila.
mataas daw ang nakuha sa hydro at geotech. yung sa structural... ewan. baket nga ba po uli?
to anonymous:
tama ka di ako CE. REE ako pero di namin naging ganyan attitude namin, licensed na nga ako pero up to now sinasabi ko na tsamba pa rin ang pagkakapasa ko. Sorry sa nasaktan ko sa word na deserving. Pero ito ang payo ko sa inyo. Di basehan ang licensed ninyo pg nagwowork na kayo. Attitude pare attitude ang importante. Bakit ko nasabi yan kasi pag nagwork na kayo dun ninyo malalaman kung bakit? Next time antayin ninyo muna ang result bago kayo magyabang. Payong kapatid lang
to: daniel john
alam ko un kaya nga kung nasasaktan ka baka isa ka sa mga nagyayabang. Isa ba bakit di ako nababagay dito sa site na ito? nabili mo naba ito. Yan hirap sa ating mga pinoy ayaw mapagsabihan. tingin kasi natin sa sarili natin napakataas.
alam mu REE2001 wag kana makisawsaw dahil usapang CE to... masyado na mataas ung tensyon d2 kaya wag ka na magbida jan ha.. mas maganda siguro kung tatahimik ka na lng jan.. dahil wala ka nman magiging kakampi d2 dahil puro kmi CE d2 ok...
Dude, wala ka sa lugar para pagsabihan mo. Alam mo ng down emotionally ang mga nagtake, may sermon ka pang nalalaman? Check mo yung mga pinagsasabi ko dito at wala kang makikita kundi Godbless. Asan ang mayabang dun? Stop the bombardment dude. We don't need it coz we're down already.
Kuya REE, hinde ko maipagkakailang marami talagang mayabang na post dito sa mga comment dito. Pasensya na. Hinde naman lahat dito mayabang. Yung iba hinahayaan na lang kasi sanay na. Pasensya na at para sa ibang civil engineering graduates dito tulad ko ay sanay na sa ganitong mga conversation. At pasensya na rin at hinahayaan lang namin sila (or kami kung kasama ako) kasi no big deal na sa amin yung iba. Pag malala naman na, pinipilit pa rin naman naming awatin ang isa't-isa.
Pasensya na po sa sasabihin ko. Alam ko nagmamagandang loob ka lang naman at mas marami kang karanasan sa buhay kaya ganyan ka magsalita. We admit. We have our faults for being childish.
Pero sana naman mo, wag kang magdiwang dyan sa upuan na para bang na-point out mo na sa amin na napakababaw at napakababa naming mga nilalang.
Marami po sa board na ito ang nagbabasa pero di nagcocomment. Marami po sa mga ito ay mga ce graduates na masama ang loob sa resulta pero nanatili pa rin naman civilized. Marami po dito ang masakit talaga ang kalooban.
At mabasa po ang pinagsusulat nyo, isipin mo nang, "E baka natatamaan ka lang!" pero masakit po kasi ang sinasabi nyo. Kung di mo man kayang unawain ang nararamdaman ng karamihan dito at gusto nyo lang ay magturuan ng leksyon ang karamihan sa amin, please naman.
Hinde ka man maniwala pero hinde ang words ng isang taong mataas na tulad mo ang nakakatulong para maramdaman naming may karamay kami.
tama si CORNED BEEF... sana lng makiramdam ka in kung anu ba tlga ang iniisip at mga saloobin nmin naun.. hindi ganun kadali na tanggapin na ganito ang mga nangyayari sa CE naun... mahirap dahil pinaghirapan nmin at pinaghandaan ang exam na un pro nauwi lng sa ganito.. kya sana itigil mu na yang pag sawsaw mu sa isyu na to... usapang CE na lng muna Bro. wag u muna umepal.. ok.. ingat kaw.. ^^
Corned Beef, sa structural nahulihan ng leakage/kodigo yung dalawang kumag kaya retake din ang structural.
kawawa naman ung mga nag hirap mag aral.. isa na ung bf ko na nakita ko kung pano mag aral.. sobra nmn sana namn ayusin nyo to! hay.. mca
AH!!! ALAM KO YAN!!! E SA UE YAN E!! (nagsalita daw ba haha)
Pero oo nga. Nabalita nga sa amin yun nung watcher namin. Pero di ba naban sila to take CE examinations? what's the problem? Ibig sabihin, feeling nila may nakalusot pa rin? Ganun ba sila hinde kareliable?
naaalala ko bago kmi mag start sa structural sa UE may pumasok na NBI sa room nmin tpos pina hubad pati sapatos nmin pati todo kapkap pati ung bulsa pinahila palabas.. may nahuli daw kc cla na may kodigo sa baba.. eh nsa 5th floor kmi nun.. tpos may nahulihan din daw na 2 ang celfon.. kaya aun todo kapkap samin.. eh kung nung tym na un eh nahuli na nila eh bakit kaya tau nadadamay naun? d kaya dahilan na lng ng PRC ung mga nahulhan ng kodigo?
Its really unfair for those students who gave their best just to pass their exams..be considerate to their efforts!! nakaka awa sila.. i ddnt take the exam im just concern about them because i have friends who gave their best to get a good score.. lage na lang ganito nangyayari taon taon! problema ang nasa inyo hindi sa mga nag tatke ng exam.. QUATRO
to CORNED BEEF
Di ko naman nilalahat ang ng CE. Kaya nga gumamit ako ng word na madami. Pero sa lahat ng nagcomment sayo lang ako humanga. Kasi kahit alam kong galit ka sa akin trinay mo pa rin akong pagsabihan in a good way. Siguro inis ako payabangan ang usapan. pero you're right di ako dapat magsalita sa inyo nang ganun. Payo ko na lang sa inyo magprepare nalang kayo for retake tingin final nayang decision na yan. Sama ko na lang kayo sa prayers ko.
21 out of 30 kasi sa kodigo/leakage, tumpak na sagot sa structural kaya nag-assume siguro ang PRC na kumalat yung leakage na yun. Base na rin siguro sa results ng structural natin. Sa anong review center kaya galing yun? Hmmmm...
Thank you po kuya REE.
Mga kasama ko. Alis na ko. Sana maayos natin ang pwede pang maayos!! Keep praying!! JINI NA E HAHAHA!! YEY!!! Bai bai!!
pa'no ung hindi nakakuha ng 50% sa math.. di rin naman papasa kahit makuha ang hydro and design... kawawa naman pag umasa pa... sayang ang pamasahe papuntang testing center...
To all CE
Sensya na at naoffend ko kayo. Sana ipagpray ninyo na maaayos pa ito.
kung di naman review uli para sa jan 2, 07 ok na. At dun sa mga nangodiko try ninyong maging fair. Sarap pumasa ng board kung alam mong nahirapan ka. Hindi sa board exam nagtatapos ang mga pangarap ninyo. Dito palang magsisimula. Again Sorry sa inyong lahat. God Bless.
TO: PRC
You are being soo unfair to us (EXAMINEES)..why can't you accept the Fact the kinaya naming I-solve ung Hydro and Struc..It's because nag "SUNOG-KILAY" pa kami at ilang buwan ding pinaghandaan ung Exam!.. Tapos, pag mataas ung nakuha naming Score, sasabihin niyong my Leakage??!! Aba,eh, ano pa ung silbi ng Pag-aaral namin kung wala kayong tiwala sa kakayahan namin!!!
WE WILL PROTEST AND SPEAK FOR OUR RIGHTS!!!!!!
thnx kuya REE.. Godbless sau... guys PKP Patay Kung Patay!!! kaya natin to... Gudlak sa atin.. alis na din me.. mga dude start na tau aral tom.. gudlak..^^
Godbless you to your endeavors REE2001. I also apologize for my words.
TO PRC,
UNG SINASABI NYO N IRREGULARITY NDE SMEN MGA EXAMINEES UN..NASA SENYO UNG IRREGULARITY..KYO ANG NGBBGY NG EXAM,SNYO DN MNGGAGALING ANG LEAKAGE KNG MERON TLG..UNG HYDRO-GEO KASALANAN B NMN NMEN MGA EXAMINEES UN KNG MADALI..AT UNG S DESIGN N NAHULI NGKODIGO PROBLEMA NYO N S KANILA UN..KYA NGA KYO NGSUSUSPEND S MGA MANDURUGAS WAG NYO KME IDAMAY UNG WLA KINALAMAN..2 LNG UN OUT OF THOUSANDS N EXAMINEES..SA ADMIN NG SITE N E2 SNA IPABASA NYO PO MGA COMMENTS NMEN S PRC..IPAABOT NYO N RN S KNLA E2..PUTANGINA NYO MGA TG-PRC PTI N RN DUN S 2 NGKODIGO N UN!!! BGO KYO GMWA NG DECISION ISIPIN NYO MNA MABUTI!!! ANG GALING NYO PG SA SINGILAN NG FEES ANG SUSUNGIT P NG MGA TAO NYO DYN S PRC PURO NMN KAWALANGYAAN PNGGGWA NNYO MGA PUTANGINA NYO!!!
Ako yung nagsulat nung comment na ito sa kabila. pasensya na po sa haba pero you'll find this one "enlightening" maraming salamat po.
Sa aking mga kasamang CE,
Ang pinalabas ng PRC na advisory ay isang insulto, at isang malaking panloloko upang mapagtakpan lamang ang kanilang kamalian. Bakit ko nasabi? Nais ko sanang ipaliwanang.
Unang una ang statement na "Sobrang taas ng score sa Hydro at Design"
Kung ating iisipin, iniinsulto ang kakayahan natin ng pagsagot ng mga problema sa board exam ng statement na ito... bakit?
Kailan pa naging mali ang magkaroon ng madaming mataas na score? Kung ganoon ba dapat ba na walang makasagot ng exam nila para masabing "VALID" ito? Kung ganoon pala, ano pa ang silbi ng pag-aaral natin kung nakadisenyo din pala ang exam na ito para hindi tayo "MAKAKUHA NG MATAAS NA SCORE".
Kahit saan natin tingnan WALA SA ATIN ANG KAMALIAN DAHIL IBINIGAY NILA ANG EXAM, AT SINAGUTAN NATIN. MADAMING MATAAS ANG SCORE HINDI BA TAMA LANG NA SABIHIN NILANG MAHUSAY ANG KINALABASAN AT HINDI SABIHING "MALAMANG AY MAY DAYAAN"? Anong klaseng pag-iisip o kaisipan yan?
Pangalawa, "Dalawa sa mga nag take ang nahulihan ng cellphone"
Oo isang malaking possibility ito, pero nakasaad sa guidelines ng PRC ay: "KUNG MAY MAHULIHAN NG CELLPHONE AUTOMATIC NA BAGSAK NA SILA AT KAILANMAN AY DI NA MAKAKA TAKE NG EXAM"
Mga kasama, wag tayong magpadala sa emosyon.
Kung makikita nyo ang statement na ito, at aanalisahin, makikita nyong pinapalabas nilang dahil sa dalawang yun ay kailangan nating mag retake? ulitin nyo ang pagbasa sa huling sentence ko... Mali hindi ba? contradicting na sa unang pahayag sa GUIDELINES nila, bukod dito, dalawa yun sa 3000 o mas madami pang nag take ng board exam sa buong Pilipinas, kailan naging FACTOR ang DALAWA sa TATLONG LIBO O MAS MADAMI PA?
Ang tanging ginawa nila dito ay makuha ang emosyon natin at may mapagbalingan ng galit. Magandang strategy, pero CIVIL ENGINEER TAYO, MARUNONG TAYO MAG ANALYZE. Wag tayong magpadala sa emosyon natin, pagaralan ang mga bagay bagay. Mali ang pangalawang statement na ito, bukod pa dito, malaki ang pakiramdam ko na gawa gawa lamang nila ito upang masabi nating "oo kailangan nating mag retake dahil sa dalawang yun..." kita nyo na? ang masasabi ko, HINDI TAYO TANGA PARA MANIWALA.
Uulit ulitin ko, hindi na tayo grade one at HINDI KAILAN MAN NAGING GROUP EFFORT ANG BOARD EXAM, UNG DALAWA LANG ANG NAHULI NILA, WALA SILANG KARAPATAN NA I DEPRIVE ANG MAS NAKAKARAMI SA TAMA LAMANG AT PINAGHIRAPAN NA SA ATIN. HINDI ITO CASE NG KASALANAN NG ISA, KASALANAN NG LAHAT.
Kahit sa korte natin pag usapan ito, siguradong panalo tayo.
Mga kaibigan, at kasamang CE, huwag payagan ito, hindi kailanman natin naging kasalanan ang kamalian ng mga examiners. Kung madali ang binigay na exam, sila ang dapat magsisihan. Hindi dapat ibato sa atin ang kamalian at I MISLEAD ang emosyon natin sa pagsasabi ng kung ano ano pang explination para lamang mag retake tayo.
Wag magpadala sa emosyon at matutuhan ang salitang "READ BETWEEN THE LINES" Engineer tayo, hindi tayo mangmang na tao na sasang ayon lamang sa kung ano ang sabihin sa atin, dahil may kakayahan tayong mag-isip.
Ianalyze nyo ng mabuti ang statement ng PRC na iyan at madami kayong makikitang butas. Ang mga nakita ko ay konti o maliit lamang sa maaring makita ng mas madami. Hanapin natin ang katotohanan at wag payagan ang pang iinsultong ito.
Sana'y ipakalat natin ang sulat na ito sa mga site, blogs o e-mail sa ating mga kapatid na CE para mabuksan din ang kanilang kaisipan sa mga nangyayaring maaring hindi rin nila nauunawaan... Gawin nating isa ang ating galaw upang mas malakas at mas malawak ang ating mga magiging pag kilos.
Maraming salamat sa inyong pagbabasa at patnubayan tayo ng Maykapal.
10 days nilang pngisipan yng gimik n may nhuli silang gumamit ng celfone….
Kng may tlgng nhulihan cla ilbas nla kng cno pra mlman n hindi gmik lng….
Tutal lking perwisyo nmn yng ngwa kng cno man yng kulangot n yon kng meron tlga….
O msama s loob nla n mdami mataas s hydro???
hydro & design b ang retake???
Meron na bang Official Statement ang PRC at Board of Examiners nyo?
Anyways, I remember sa review namin (ECE po ako), sinabihan kami na kung sa palagay namin eh ma-peperfect namin yung exam, eh wag daw. Malian daw namin kahit isa o dalawa. Kasi nga skeptical ang PRC kapag perfect ang score mo (which is really unfair if you really answered it without cheating or so). The situation really sucks.
Problema din dyan sa mga proctors ng exam eh yung uniformity ng mga SOP's nila. Meron kasing proctors na mahigpit, as in lahat chinecheck sa katawan mo. Meron namang walang kaeffort-effort na magcheck ng mga examinee.
At sa mga examinees din na masyadng desperado, kung nagagawa nyong manulad at mag-cheating nung college, ibahin nyo naman ang Board exam. Walang kwenta kung pumasa ka, eh bobo ka naman. Pag nagtrabaho ka, expected sa yo eh alam mo lahat tungkol sa profession mo. Kaso nga bobo ka, at isang cheater, kawawa ka din. Mapapahiya ka lang.
Let's just keep on praying that things will go according to what is right and what God wills.
God bless us all!
uphds
ano ba naman to hindi nyo nalang inicip na mga cheaters kayo ma konsensya naman kayo!! paano yan taga davao kami tapos sa cebu kami nag take kailangan paba naming bumalik doon sa cebu para lang mag take ulit? ano ba naman yan!! nakaka inis naman!! ang dali2x ng geotech nakakahiya doon pag hindi mo na perfect kaya nga malalaki scores namin ehh kac basic na basic lang! sana tiningnan nyo muna yun bago kayo mag reklamo!
kakaawa nmn ang mga magulang ntin.. Sa halip na mgiging masaya ang ating pasko eh npalitan ng lungkot at pagkabahala..
My lolo is dying & i want him to be happy & proud sken bgo cia mamatay..
Lgi nya kinukumuzta ang result ng bord exam ko.. Pro anu tong retake na toh! PRC maawa nmn kau!
cencia 4 d terms.. TANG INA..
kakainis tlga..
kakaawa tlga mga magulang ntn..
may magagawa ba tayo?
ano ba naman ang mga reasons ninyo hindi naman namin gagawin ang leakage sa napaka sisiw na exam!! hello 5 years in college is more than enough to answer those basic question!! and i na accused nyo po kami of cheating because of high scores o commo'n!! cut the crap! yung mga nandaya jan kung sino man yan sila sana yun nalang ang i retake nyo pati elementary education nila pati preschool hindi kami na lumaban ng parehas!!! mag isip naman kayo prc!!
anu ga namang padali yaan...puro na irregularities...tanggalin na lhat ng gmgawa ng exam at ngchecheck..gagawa sila ng exam na madali tpos kapag mataas nakuha eh magtatka sila...wala na dpat retake...suspend na lng ung mga nagkasala 4 two years..db ganun ung tama..kawawa nmn ung mga honest na ngtake..sayang ang pagod na gnugol nila...UNFAIRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!MABUHAY ANG MGA ARKITEKTO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
TO ALL PADILLA REVIEWEES:
May meeting daw tayo bukas, Friday at 8 am. Pag uusapan kung ano ang move natin but we might as well be prepared for the retake if it will push through.
Sorry, hindi pa pala Friday bukas. Hehe! Baliw na.
DAPAT YATA AY WALANG MAKAPASA SA BOARD EXAM PARA SABIHING VALID ANG RESULT NITO...PALITAN NA LAHAT NG OFFICIAL NG PRC...KELANGAN CGURO SILA ANG MAGREVIEW PARA MAKAGAWA SILA NG RULES AND REGULATIONS NA FAIR PARA SA LAHAT....SILA GUMAWA NG EXAM TPOS MGTATAKA SILA KAPAG MATATAAS ANG RESULT...EH KUNG PANG NURSING NA LNG ANG EXAM NA IBINIGAY NILA SA MGA ENGINEERS EH D WALA MAKAKAPASA...UN YATA GUSTO NILA EH.............!!!!!!!!!!!!*#@$*';.%#$@%(*&^%$)%*^)%$##^&##$.............GGGGGGGGGGGGRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRR!!!?????????
GUYS LETS MAKE OUR MOVE!!!!
IPAALAM NTEN TO SA SENADO!!!!!
WALA LEAKAGE SA CE BORD EXAM!!
PINAPARETAKE TAU NG PRC KC D NILA MATANGGAP N MATATAAS SCORE NTEN.. TAMA B UN,,,FUCKING RISON YAN!!!
DUN SA STRUCTURAL SUBJ,,NDE NMN NILA SINABING LEAKAGE UN,,CHETING UN NG 2 PIPOL TPOS VERY ISOLATED PA!!!
PUNTA TAU SENADO 0_0
To the two cheaters:
Now, you have realized how the LAW OF KARMA works!! Imagine, you've been spending 5 years or more in college in preparation for your profession and yet here you are embracing all the lion share of blame. It's a solid slap on your school where you belong, in your family and in yourself buddy!! As the saying goes, "In life and in works when cheating rules, no one wins." Nandamay pa kayo ng iba. You are putting the CE community in hot water.
So where do you go from here?
You may now start counting your friends!!!
Goodluck to your next endeavor.
good morning.. how i wish it was just a dream anyway thats totally cruel??!!
to whom it may concern why its always the PRC comes superior ? this is supposed to be a democratic
country and come to think of it the very reason why they exist is for our welfare as professionals it should be a fair and good affiliation between us not like this...?duh? we better call the attention of the PICE officers.. that should be the first thing to do than lashing out grrr!!... anybody here with any relation to anyone in the PICE? the PICE should be act as emulsion between the professionals and the PRC for a balance and just examination among civil engineer hopefulls. huhuhu
walang nahuling nagcheat...palusot nalng ng prc yan...wla sa guidelines ang marere take ang buong kumuha ng exam kapag may nahuli na nagchecheat!!!!chek nyo sa mga guidelines na binigay nila satin!!! hoy PRC nung nagreregister kme kung tratuhin nyo kme para kaming di bumubuhay sa inyo...kulang nlng sabihin nyo na wag na kme magexam at di rin kme papasa!!ngayon na matataas nakuha namin,sasabihin nyo na retake!!!anong klaseng mentality yan!!!kung si sir dindo ng expertz nakaya maperfect ang math at structural tas isa lng mali sa hydro and geotech...ibig sabihin walang impossible...nakapaghanda lng tlga majority samin!!!!PRC wag nyo kaming linlangin!!!!
PRC orders retake of parts of civil-engineering exam
THE Professional Regulation Commission has ordered a retake in the subjects Hydraulics and Geotechnical Engineering and Structural Engineering and Construction in the November 17 and 18, 2007, civil engineer licensure examination given by the Board of Civil Engineering.
The commission nullified examination results in the two subjects after it discovered “irregularities” in the results. A total of 4,782 examinees took the licensure examination in eight test centers nationwide—Manila, Baguio, Cagayan de Oro, Cebu, Davao, Iloilo, Legazpi and Tacloban.
The commission, in a statement, said the examination results in Hydraulics and Geotechnical Engineering were “statistically improbable,” pointing to the “unusually” high grades obtained by the examinees. In Structural Engineering and Construction, the commission added, two examinees were caught in possession of mobile phones, which were confiscated by an agent of the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI). The mobile phones were later turned over to the commission. It said it had discovered that one of the mobile phones contained answers to 30 examination questions wherein 21 answers were found to be correct.
The commission reported the irregularities and its decision to order a retake after nullifying the results in the two subjects to Secretary Arturo Brion of the Department of Labor and Employment. The statement said Brion “lauded [its] swift and decisive action.”
The commission referred the matter to the NBI, suggesting that the bureau conduct an investigation, including the identification of the people behind the irregularities.
To afford the examinees the earliest possible opportunity to retake the examination in the two subjects without need for further review class, the commission said it will administer the test on January 12, 2008, without need to pay the examination fee. The commission added that the examinees shall no longer take the subject Mathematics, Surveying and Transportation Engineering.
Examination details on the new school where the test will be conducted and room assignment will be posted at the commission’s central and regional offices and on its website.
The examinees are required to present their notice of admission, which they used in the November 17 and 18, 2007, examination, on the day of the retake.
Last year, the Professional Regulatory Commission also discovered irregularities in the licensure examination for nurses. Examinees retook parts of the test early this year.
--The Manila Times
ilabas nyo resulta ng math PRC!!!!may karapatan kme malaman ang resulta!!!para naman alam ng iba sa amin kung nararapat pa kme kumuha!!!napaka unfair sa ibang examinees na nasa malalayo pang probinsya at walang sapat na pera para mamasahe pa!!!hanggang sa retake di makatarungan ginagawa nyo samin!!!sana mabasa itong mga hinaing natin ng mga taga PRC!!!nagbayad kme kaya may karapatan kme malaman ang resulta ng math!!!maawa kyo sa mga examinees na idinadaos lng ang pera na pamasahe para makapag exam!!!!
dapat imbestigahan ang PRC!!!LUMALABAS LNG NA SA PRC AY MAY CORRUPT NA OFFICIAL AT PARA NAMAN SA MGA REVIEW CENTERS NA NAGBIBIGAY NG LEAKAGE DAPAT DI NA SILA MABIGYAN NA PERMIT!!!!PERA LANG HABOL NYO SA MGA REVIEWEES!!!PINAPAKITA NYO LNG NA WALANG KAMENG MATUTUTUNAN SA INYO KUNDI ANG MANDUGAS!!!KAYA SILA NAGBIBIGAY NG LEAKAGE PARA MAY MAKAPAG TOP SA KANILANG REVIEWEES AT MAGING MALAKI PERCENTAGE NG PASSING NILA TAPOS PAPAPRINT NLA AT BIBIGAY NILA SA MGA GRADUATES PARA SA KANILA MAGREVIEW!!!PERA PERA LANG YAN!!!BABAYARAN NAMAN NILA SA PRC ANG LEAKAGE SA MALAKING HALAGA ITO ANG CAPITAL NILA!!!KAYA SA MGA REVIEW CENTERS KATULAD NG E____TZ AT P____LA SALUDO AKO SA INYO AT DI NYO KAME PINAPAASA SA MGA LEAKAGE!!!SALAMAT SA MGA NATUTUNAN NAMIN SA INYO!!!SANA LHAT NG TAO SA GOBYERNO NATIN TULAD NINYO NA NAGBIBIGAY NG MAGANDANG EHEMPLO!!!!!
SPAM
If the re-take will really take place this Jan. 12, 2008;
I would like to ask from the PRC authorities of how they come up with the conclusion in the investigation the word used in the report na
“LEAKAGE” leakage is different from cheating!!! Am i right??
I would like to know the nature of the investigation of how could the CDO PRC authorities allow examinees to bring cellphones in the examnation room, for which, in the first place-naa tay RULES issued by the PRC. How come, they allow examinees from CDO to use cellular phones? is it an UNprofessional act? taga PRC pa naman kayo!
And, why bother of we had high scores in Hydraulic and Geotechnical Engineering. Especially, board exam yun noh, we aim for High, we aim for the Glory and we aim to pass. Problema bah namin yun kung simple problems ang pinalabas sa exam? kasalana bah namin yun?
And, to the PRC and Board of Civil Engineers, try to think before you act!!! mura sad mog dili mga professional.
Try to imagine our efforts for 6 months of rigid review:
*for the 6 months rental sa aming boarding house.
*for the 6 months na gastusin.
*for the 6 months na fare sa jeep.
*for the 5 long years in college in order to gain the bachelor’s degree in Civil Engineering.
*and for our Parents.
Christmas is fast approaching….it would be a joyous celebration for families and love-ones…
I and WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO KNOW IT ALL!!!!
“The right of the people to information on matters of public concern shall be recognized. Access to official records, and to documents and papers pertaining to official acts, transactions, or decisions, as well as to government research data used as basis for policy development, shall be afforded the citizen, subject to such limitations as may be provided by law.
(Sec. 7, Art. 3-Bill of Rights, 1987 Phil. Constitution)”
CE 1941
Langya kayo. kapal ng mga hasang ninyo. di pa nga kayo nakakapasa madaldal na kayo. buti nga sa inyo! kulang pa yan! dapat dyan ma ban na kayong lahat. mga peste kayo. umuwi na nga kayo para maghugas. pag nakita ko pa kayo dito, pasensyahan na lang tayo. puro kayo ingay! mga bwiset. Kol-jaks na lang kayo.
Your truly,
the leakage man
To all CE,,,,
I AM SORRY,,,DKC AKO NAG REVIEW KAYA NGAWA KONG MAGCHEAT.... SORRY TLAGA.....
YOURS TRULY,,
CHEATER.........................
Anonymous, what gibberish thing are you talking about???
S MGA CHEATERS DYAN MBUHAY TAUNG LHAT!!!!!!!!!!!!! PNALO N NMN TAU............ DHIL NHULI TAU E............... NEXT TYM INGAT TAU KONTI PRA ISA ISA LNG ANG HULI. SALAMAT AT MKIKITA KO P CLA S RETAKE. WATCH OUT FOR ME........... WHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHA!!!!!!!!!
PRC MRAMING MARAMING SALAMAT PO S LEAKAGE.... S RETAKE PO ULIT...... WAG NIO PO KMI KAKAKLIMUTAN....... KC SAYANG ANG BAYAD S INYO..................
PAPI.... WOWOWEE
TO CE 1941:
manahimik ka napakaduwag mo para magsalita ka ng ganyan dito!!!kung wala ka magawa wag ka mikisawsaw dito!!!kung matapang ka magsalita ka sa harap ng camera at sabihin mo yan!!post mo sa youtube at post mo d2 yung url para makita ng mga and2 pagmumukha mo!!!manahimik ka nakikisawsaw ka sa mga bagay na hindi hingid sa iyong kaalaman!!!
HOY DANIELJAN, BAGSAK K LNG KYA K NGAKAKAGANYAN E.... MAG-ARAL K KC NG MBUTI PRA PUMSA KA........................................... S NURSING....... CGURO NURSING K TLGA KYA SNUSUNDAN K NG MALAS................... HEHHEHEHEHEHEHHEHE...
TIL NEXT EXAM.........
sa mga isip bata na pumapapael dito at ginagawang biro ang isyu na ito...pwede manahimik na kayo!!!mahiya kyo sa mga comment na nilalagay nyo dito...hindi kme nakikipaglaro o nagbibiruan d2...kung utak ipis kyo...di kyo nararapat d2 sa forum na 2...wag nyo ipakita d2 kung gano kyo ka mang-mang at walang pinagaralan!!!
MAY SOLUSYON DYAN,,,, MAGKITA TYO SA RECTO,,,, PAGAWAN KITA LESENSYA.......................... KC NAG LEAKAGE K KYA K GANYAN,,, NAGREVIEW KA WALA K PALANG TIWALA SA SARILI MO,,,,, TANGA,,,,,,,,,
ANG NOVEMBER 2007,,,, ISA KYONG HISTORY N D N MBUBURA,,,,,, NOV.07 RETAKER,, DB KYO NHHIYA,,,,, PINAPANGIT NYO IMAHE NG CIVIL,,,,,,,,,,,, BUWSSSSSSEEEEEEEEESEEEEEEETTTTTT KYO LHAT,,,,,,,,,GNYA NYO P ANG NURSING,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, KYO ANG MAGPAPABAGSAK SA CE......
it's unfair to everyone to have our retake for the parts 2 & 3 of our ce board exam, there are so many people who have done their best to pass the said board exam then the PRC has come up for a decision to "retake" our board exam since many of the examinees got the highest mark on the said part of the exam...if there are to blame for the fault it's the PRC..sa mga taga-PRC wag naman kaung maghugas ng kamay dahil may mali din kayo..........
from: c.e.1988
puro kayu angal at kayabangan, kung di kayo naka kuha ng leakage bakit kayu matatakot na magretake. buti nga kayo pwede na kayu tsumamba ngayun eh.. dapat nga ibalik nalang sa manu manu eh... para di mahaluan ng mga bugok ang c.e. niyayabang nyu na my naka perfect sa inyu eh nag trial and error lang naman kayo.
to engr.103 & ce1941:
mga papansin d2...i bat tsamba lng pagpasa nyo,kc kung professional tlga kyo di ganyan mga pinagsasabi nyo.kayo ang kahihiyan ng ce at asal hayop kayo...i bet yan ang turo ng mga magulang nyo...be professional...=D sa gnagawa nyo nagrereflect na di kyo nararapat mabigyan ng lisencya...kayo ang mga dapat magretake...di kyo deserving sa propesyon ninyo...
sa mga makakabasa ng mga commento ng mga papansin d2...wag nyo na pansinin at kulang lng tlga sa pansin ng tao...wag nyo na patulan ang kababawan ng pagiisip nila...
ce ran21
bilib ako sayu i know makakapasa ka galingan mu pag rereview ulit
dapat po ilabas ng PRC ang results ng exam ng math kasi po kung di naman sila nakapasa dun para saan pa at kailangan nila kumuha nga\ retake.
kasi po pag ng below 50% ang score automatic n bagsak nasiya, sayang lang ang effort n gagawin niya pati pagod at pamasahe...
CE1941, I bet you're too old because your balls are in your mouth. Haha! You don't know what your talking about.
mr. civil engineer
bakit nagkakaganito ang PRC nawawalan n ng kribilidad, siguro pati a ahensya nila marami nang anumalya kaya pati sa pagbibigay ng exam ina anumalya n....
Para kay Anonymous.......
Roses are red, violets are blue, bagsak ang CE dahil sa yo........
Mag boxing ka na lang.... tutal naman kwuadrado mukha mo..... baka pumantay pag nasapak....
Ganon pa man...... retake ka pa rin....whek-hek-hek-hek
mr. civil engineer
kailangan n po yata palitan ang namumuno dyan sa PRC kasi parang wala n siyang silbi kasi nalulusutan sila ng mga anumalya..
panu p maniniwala ang mga dayuhan satin para tau i hire kung ganyan lagi sa pagkuha ng exam....
gising mga tao sa PAMAHALAAN gawan niyo ito ng aksyon....
to ce1988:
pasencya na po at kaya nga ginawa ang calculator para gamitin.ang hirap po sa atin crab mentality..di po ba nyo naisip na hindi kme natatakot magretake...nanghihinayang lng po kme sa panahon na nasasayang at sa perang nauubos namin sa pagkuha ng exam...karamihan po sa amin d2 ay may kakulangan sa pera...isa pa po na daing namin ang rason nila para sa retake ay di saklaw ng kanilang guidelines...
ce batch nov. 2007....
di nyo ba naiisip na k8 makapasa pa kayu sa darating na retake exam eh di na mawawla ang pagdududa sa batch nyu... at wala na kayu magagawa sa bagay na yun dahil lang sa kagagawan ng dalawang loko2 na yun. ninais mangodigo makapasa lang....
TO DANIEL JOHN....
DI BALE MAY BALLS ME LISENSYA NAMAN....IKAW MERON? RETAKE KA RIN...
SYANGA PALA, TATAY MO ME BALLS? SAAN? NASA BIBIG NG LOLA MO? PAKI SAGOT.....
guys i was wrong when i posted a wrong info bout the non-retake, i was assuming there'll be no retakes to happen, i should have listen to my instinct yesterday. its just a matter of reverse psychology,. guys, the long wait was over, i think this site should be commented twice or thrice that of what was posted in the CE result site,.
SHOCKING!
IRREGULARITY? HMMMM..
SHOCKING!
to those who are waiting so long for the result, haven't you asked yourselves, is it an irregularity to consider to have a high score in a test or examination wherein almost all examinees took it very easy and telling that it was such an easy test?
guys, i am reflecting, i am a 4th year CE stud and i am thinking of the implication/s this issue might bring, i feel pressured by this issue.
of all the comments in this site, i must agree to anonymous who told that ang kasalanan ng 2 ay hindi pwede isisi sa lahat, right. fight for what we think is right. fight for our right.
hirap kaya magaral ng walang pinatutunguhan ang ginagawa.
on the other side of the issue, havent you think na malakig kasiraan to sa CE world? ano pat naging matapang tayo sa pagkundina kay sexynurse? bakit naman ang kasalanan o mas tamang tawaging irregularidad ng mga tagapangasiwa ng exam ay ipasa sa mga kumuha ng exam?
ang issue na ito ay hindi dapat palampasin. hindi dapat tantanan, dapat imbestigahan.
punuin din ng comment ang site na to para marealize nila ang ating mga sentimyento.
inuulit ko, hindi ako nagtake ng board exam pero nakikinita ko na kasi ang posibleng mga implikasyon nito sa ating mga inhinyero to be.
e2 nga pla si KANIN_tubig,
to corned beef
i think you will gonna pass retake b.exam..... gudluck saiyo... sainyong lahat...
ce1988
CE1941, you're acting like a sissy girl. You talk too much. You don't sound like a professional. Your actions are disgraceful. You said you're "licensed" but you don't ACT like one.
TO DANIEL JOHN.....
BEFORE I FORGET....... YOUR MOTHER LIKED MY BALLS....... MAYBE YOU'LL LIKE IT TOO.....
Daniel john wam mo na pansinin si ce1941 at di yan tlga propesyonal walng lisensya yan...nagpapapansin lng yan d2 at malamang walang magawa dhil unemployed...nyahahahaha!!!sa pananalita plng ni ce1941 wala na pinagaralan...kya mga sis/bro wag na nyo pansinin ang mga papansin...malamang pa wla mga magawa kc unemployed...dumi ng pagiisip meron ang mga ganitong klase ng tao...ce1941 magfriendster kna lng...di bagay sayo site na ito.=D
How come you had balls? You're a sissy girl? Haha!
TO DANIEL JOHN AND TO ANONYMOUS....
BALLS? AKO MERON IKAW? NASA BIBIG NI ANONYMOUS? USO BA SA CE ANG MGA BADING? REVIEW KAYO DAHIL PAG NAKAPASA KAYO...... GAGAHASAIN KO MGA NANAY NINYO!.....
ce1941 ama cap ur ass out!lol!=D you talk too much!!get ur ass outa here!
You can blabber all you want. Besides, I don't think you're an engineer. Not a single professional would talk as much and as lame as you would. You don't seem so bright to me because all you talk about is your filthy old wrinkling balls. Do us a favor, shut up and leave.
to ce1941:
di balls pinaguusapan dito!yan ba ang board passer???ang mang gahasa???mahiya ka naman sa lahi mo...wla ka na nga trabaho..asal squater ka pa!
ce1941 tawag ka ng nanay mo, pakainin mo na daw ang baboy nyo.aga aga palang daw nangangapit bahay ka na daw para maki gamit ng PC...pag nasira mo daw yan wala kyo pambayad!
Anyway, let's just forget about that creep. May meeting daw ang PICE National Board ngayon. Let's just pray that everything will turn out well. Let's pray for God's guidance.
To PRC officials, Board of Civil Engineering, fellow engineers and to all those who just took the exam,
I took the board exam last November 2006 and I have to admit that the exam during our time was fairly easy, especially the hydraulics and geotechnical subjects or specifically Part 2. Now, officials have stated that the results of the said subjects were “statistically improbable” and “unusually” high, if they wouldn’t mind, kindly present the statistics in comparison with the previous results of the board examinations. Considering that that part of exam was far from difficult, then in my opinion, every examinee has the right to know why the results were considered statistically improbable (quotations now removed).
As for the third part of the exam or the structural subject, if reports have been confirmed that there were two cheaters from one testing center and were caught, I am assuming that they were met with justifiable penalties. Were they questioned whether or not they had access to a leakage? If so, then I agree that all those who took the exam last November 17 and 18 should take the exam again. For the reason that a leakage of the licensure exam was present. However, if there was no leakage at all, then if it is at all possible, spare the innocent since the culprits were caught. On the other hand, I am assuming as well that the authorities CAN NOT pin-point those who benefited from the cheaters and thus leaves that the civil engineering profession of the Philippines tainted because of them.
If a retake of the licensure exam is really bound to happen next year, may I suggest then, that the exam be all the covered subjects and not only the affected subjects of the controversy. So as to say that the Civil Engineering Profession is crystal clear and not maliciously tainted by anything. Furthermore, if it is at all possible (since i think it is not because of the “system” in our country) kindly conduct a proper investigation regarding the situation.
Not only those who took the last exam are affected of this but all of the civil engineers of our country. The civil engineering profession might suffer the same fate of the nursing profession, and this is what I fear most. Our credibility is at stake.
Thank you very much for reading my comment. Good luck to every one and God bless us all.
para sa lhat ng may kinalaman sa cnasabing retake, makunsensa nman kayo.. hindi naman kasalanan ng mga examinee na mataas makuha nilang grades e s nagaral sila. kasalanan nyo na madali binigay nyong exam.. Common Sense naman.. kaya walang asenso ang Pilipinas dahil s mga patakaran na pinapalabas nyo.. ayusin nyo naman ang trabaho nyo.. sayang ng ibinabayad sa inyo ng Gobyerno..
Wag Sana kayong Patahimikin ng Kunsensya nyo kung may Kunsenxa pa kau..
Mabuti na lang at nalate ko magfile ng exam kung hindi baka sinugod ko na kayo at madamay ang lahat ng madamay.. Total dinadamay nyo yung ibang walang kasalanan.. be fair naman.. MATAKOT KAYO SA DIYOS..
mAY gANTI LAHAT NG GINAGAWA NYO..
sori FOR SAYING THIS.. But im so affected na kahit hindi ako nakapagtake ngayon e nasasaktan ako sa nangyayari dahil nagaaksaya ng pera ang mga magulang ng bawat ce n nagtake ng Board tapos ganyan pa ang mangyayari.. Yung iba pa nga nagtrabaho na para lng my pangreview tpos madadamay pa dahil na rin sa mga Fault ng PRC.
PARA PO SA MGA NAGTAKE NG BOARD:
WAg po kayong mabahala may karma rin sila.. AYUsin nyo na lang po ang retake exam nyo para mapatunayan sa kanila na mali ang ginawa nla.. and make it sure na makapasa kaung lahat.. I hope and i pray na mas marami pa ang makapasa lalo dahil para hindi kayo iunderstimate.. Gudluck to all of you..
What happened to the culprits? Were they arested? I think they should be because they eventually sabotaged our board exams. Now, 4700+ of us are suffering because of the actions of only two.
________________Reliable source _______________________________
Walang leakage na nangyari…
Maynahuli lang na dalawang cheater sa cdo (From MPSC(cdo school) and Urios (Butuan School)) dapat cla lang ang parusahan coz its a personal offense..
Main reason ng PRC: Retake ddahil malaki ang scores
Guys magkaisa tayo lets make a move.. Kya nating ipanalo ang kasong ito
IM FROM CDO… IM FROM CDO… IM FROM CDO…
—> bY D WAY ANG MGA NAHULI AY GALING LANG SA ISANG ROOM SA ROOM NA MAY LETTER C ANG FAMILY NAME
________________Reliable source _______________________________
Walang leakage na nangyari…
Maynahuli lang na dalawang cheater sa cdo (From MPSC(cdo school) and Urios (Butuan School)) dapat cla lang ang parusahan coz its a personal offense..
Main reason ng PRC: Retake ddahil malaki ang scores
Guys magkaisa tayo lets make a move.. Kya nating ipanalo ang kasong ito
IM FROM CDO… IM FROM CDO… IM FROM CDO…
—> bY D WAY ANG MGA NAHULI AY GALING LANG SA ISANG ROOM SA ROOM NA MAY LETTER C ANG FAMILY NAME
________________Reliable source _______________________________
Walang leakage na nangyari…
Maynahuli lang na dalawang cheater sa cdo (From MPSC(cdo school) and Urios (Butuan School)) dapat cla lang ang parusahan coz its a personal offense..
Main reason ng PRC: Retake ddahil malaki ang scores
Guys magkaisa tayo lets make a move.. Kya nating ipanalo ang kasong ito
IM FROM CDO… IM FROM CDO… IM FROM CDO…
—> bY D WAY ANG MGA NAHULI AY GALING LANG SA ISANG ROOM SA ROOM NA MAY LETTER C ANG FAMILY NAME
To PRC:
OFFICIALS OF PRC IS SO UNREASONABLE...
hindi po valid reason ang magretake because of ur so called "IRREGULARITIES"...
IT'S NOT THE EXAMINEES FAULT....
ang ginawa lang po ng examinees is to SPEND TIME, EFFORT AND MONEY para maging maganda ang result ng exam nila....
and sino po kau para questionin ang kakayahan nila?
kaya cguro po dapat lang din namin questionin ang kakayahan nyo bilang mga officials!
nagkataon lang po na kau ay OFFICIALS NA TINURINGAN.... pero tao din po kayo na nagkakamali
at isa po yang sa malaking pagkakamali na ginawa nyo...
You affect not only the examinees but also the family of those persons waiting anD hoping that thru this exam they will start their dreams...
But look what the PRC have done. Hindi po ito issue lang ng leakage but issue rin ng napka walang sense na dahilan ng isa sa mataas na offices ng PILIPINAS!
Hahayaan lng po b ng mga PILIPINO na daanin lang sa kapangyarihan ang lahat ng gusto nilang mangyari?
- NO RETAKE!
- IT'S THE PROFESSIONAL REGULATORY COMMISSION'S FAULT!
-IRREGULARITIES IS NOT A VALID REASON FOR RETAKE.
- IHARAP ANG CHEATERS NA YAN!THEY DESERVE IT..... IPAKITA ANG GANYANG KLASE NG TAO SA BUONG MUNDO NG DI NA GAYAHIN PA...
- ILABAS ANG MGA OFFICIALS NA NAGLALABAS NG LEAKAGE.
- ILABAS ANG TUNAY NA DAHILAN..
gawan po ito ng action... GAWIN PO ANG NARARAPAT...
its so damn unfair. below the belt na iparetake ang hydrualics and geotech dahil sa matataas ang nakuha natin results, isa lang ibig sabihin nito they underestimated us..pero we're all gonna prove them wrong, kahit ilang retake pa yan, tang ina nyo PRC ipeperfect namin ulit yan!!!!!
yang mga cheaters mga selfish!
yang PRC unreasonable....
wala sa katwiran....
why don't they think of these options:
1.PUBLISH THE TRUE RESULT OF THE CE BOARD EXAM LAST NOV. 2007.
2. RETAKE - IF THEY CAN REALLY PROVE THAT THERE IS A LEAKAGE.
3. IF THERE IS REALLY A LEAKAGE, THEY CAN HAVE A RETAKE - BUT ON THE AREA THAT IS ONLY PROVEN WHO HAVE THOSE LEAKAGE.
4. CHEATERS HAVE NO RIGHT TO TAKE BOARD EXAM ANYMORE!
This is the only way para po hindi maapektuhan ang lahat ng examinees.
For everyone na di pa nababasa ang latest info:
http://www.manilatimes.net/national/2007/nov/28/yehey/top_stories/20071128top5.html
So there... my heart bleeds with you.. Dapat ang sisihin dito eh ang nagbigay ng exam, akala siguro eh "Quiz type" lang ung ibibigay sa mga estudyante kaya tinamad gumawa ng mahihirap at complex na problems.. for sure nasa hot water yun ngayun..
So... ng mga nakalipas na araw eh panay ang away nyo sa kabilang forum ng CE.. kay SexyNurse, sa mga taga UP, sa list ng survey sa school, sa mayayaman, etc.. asa fighting mode pa rin ba kau? or asa grief mode na?
100% passing ung wish ng iba, ayan pinagbigyan kau sa 2 subjects, ayaw nyo pa?
cant help but react to those words of ce1941, would you believe a person of that age, probably 86 above, would say/utter something like that??? dont think so!!! he isnt what he claims to be, a licensed CE since '41 so dont mind him at all. he's just craving for some attention.
Let's just pray that justice will prevail.
Good luck and Godbless to all!!!
Mga ka CE, madali lng naman i trace yang c ce1941 eh, ask nyo lng ip address nya kay blog administator, pede nyo na i trace kung asan location nya.. malay nyo sa bahay nya sya nagko computer, so andali i-hunt..
Though I doubt kung ibibigay yan ni admin...
GUYS KAILAN BHA TALAG RETAKE.. SABI SA NEWS KAHAPON JANUARY 2... PERO SA NEWS PAPER EH JANUARY 12 NA.. ANU BHA TALAGA
guys magreview na lang uli kayo... u should not feel bad bout it anymore,, prove them your worth the high score, u will soon pass the reexam, u will soon be engineers,,, ano pat may removal tayo tuwing finals kung hdi natin yan kaya, kaya yan...
kaya yan...
kaya yan...
tayo pa WE SHAPED THE FUTURE,,
pray tayo lahat....
wawa na kasi mga schoolmates ko,, they've made it hard to give all their very best para sa exam knowing that in the end, may irregularities pla,,,
celebrate christmas with forgiveness,,,
prove the world we are CE's with credibility.
shame to those who are downgrading CEs
For: PRC
Engr. Lazaro....
SA TINGIN NIYO PO BA MAY KREDIBILIDAD PA BA ANG AHENSIYA NIYO SA GANITONG MGA ISYU????
HINDI NA PO BA TAYO NATUTO NUNG SA NURSING BOARD AND NAGKARUN NG LEAKAGE? O NABIGLA LANG KAYO SA PERCENTAGE NA PUMASA KASI HINDI SA EXPECTATION NIYO?
NAPAKA UNFAIR NG DESISYON NIYO. PAKITA NIYO PO UNG INVESTIGATION NIYO... KUNG SINU-SINO ANG NAGBGAY NG LEAKAGE, SINU-SINO ANG NAGCHEAT? WAG UNG BARA-BARA ANG DESISYON. RETAKE KAGAD....
SA MGA NAGBIGAY NG LEAK, MAKARMA SANA KAYO! MGA WALANG KONSENSIYA!
For: PRC
Engr. Lazaro....
SA TINGIN NIYO PO BA MAY KREDIBILIDAD PA BA ANG AHENSIYA NIYO SA GANITONG MGA ISYU????
HINDI NA PO BA TAYO NATUTO NUNG SA NURSING BOARD AND NAGKARUN NG LEAKAGE? O NABIGLA LANG KAYO SA PERCENTAGE NA PUMASA KASI HINDI SA EXPECTATION NIYO?
NAPAKA UNFAIR NG DESISYON NIYO. PAKITA NIYO PO UNG INVESTIGATION NIYO... KUNG SINU-SINO ANG NAGBGAY NG LEAKAGE, SINU-SINO ANG NAGCHEAT? WAG UNG BARA-BARA ANG DESISYON. RETAKE KAGAD....
SA MGA NAGBIGAY NG LEAK, MAKARMA SANA KAYO! MGA WALANG KONSENSIYA!
si kanin_tubig, sabi "shame to those who are downgrading CEs"
Hoyyyy! sobra kapal mo! pakibasa mo nga ung pinost mo dati ng meaning ng NURSE, tapos pakibasa mo yang sinulat mo ngaun!!!
HUNGHANG!!
"statistically improbable" - Hmmm... Bakit? May nakakuha ba ng 101 percent?
“unusually” high grades - Sa totoo lang, madali naman talaga ang exam sa Hydro/Geo na yan. Kaya talagang ma-perfect kasi basic lang ang mga tanong.
kung totoong may nahuling nag-cheat, sana a day or two after the exam kumalat na yung rumor na yan, d b? pero hindi e... matagl muna bago nagkaron ng ganyang rumor, d b?
The retake will be on january 12, 2008 accdng to PRC. Visit this site http://www.manilatimes.net/national/2007/nov/28/yehey/top_stories/20071128top5.html
Prayer is powerful!!
Gooluck everyone!!!
Well, if you can observe, CE board exam results showed very high ratings with respect to topnotchers, but very low passing percentage (below 40%). I could say that maybe the examiners would be the one to be asked on the way they are giving the questions in the exam. Getting 90% could put you on top (before) but 95% would not be enough (now). So, I believe there would be re-take. If possible, I would like to be an examiner and we'll see if you can get at least 85%. So, takers, don't be so proud that you seem to be brainy... Accept the challenge and prove your worth... Ok?
mga examinees, wag kau pumayag. Gawa kau ng letter sa prc bakit ganun..I-explain nila how come they arrive at that decision. mukhang hindi tama ung decision nila. talaga namang madali ang exam s civil. hindi pwede ang ganung reason para iparetake lahat. marami ang nahuhuli pag nageexam kahit hindi civil, kahit sa batch namin may nahuli rin. magkaisa kayo, handa naman kami tumulong.. makakasira kasi sa image ng occupation natin. by the way, im also a civil engineer included in the top notchers.
I agree to the PRC decision on the retake for the CE Licensure Exam due to the following observations:
1. CE topnotchers (First Placers) usually got a very high passing mark of at least 96% for the past 10 board examinations; but
2. Passing percentage would be very low at below 40%.
Statistically, this is unbelievable. Should I say that for you to top you must have a near perfect scores? Or simply, the questions are answerable even to the elementary pupils?
Takers, while you are the victims of such devilish acts, but let us get this straight that re-taking would somehow show you that you are worthy to be called a civil engineer once you have passed.
To the PRC, please don’t act too harsh on the takers. Note that not all are of the same feathers. Investigate the culprits and determine the roots of these anomalies. This will somehow ease the burden of these future engineers.
Finally, let us all fight to resolve eliminate these wrong practices and be a worthy professional of our flag and country.
Mr. Anonymous, hindi mahihirap na tanong ang binibigay sa board exam. Tricky questions ang binibigay dun. Dapat alam ang principles. Yun ang objective lagi ng Examiners. Hindi porket matalino ang isang tao, papasa na. Kahit ordinaryong taker lang, pwede pang mag-top basta't alam nya lahat ng principles.
bkt ktlngn mag retake p db alam nman ntn npkahrp ng buhay ngyn magandang pmasko ung pra smen ..pinaghrapan nmen ang pagrreview pra lng mkpasa s board exam tpoz retake kla q b maganda n ang pmmlkad nio ngyn dhl s ngyari s nurse tpos smen ggwn nio dn mag resign n kau mga tga prc
bakit lagi nyong kino call attention ng PRC? palagay nyo ba my taga PRC na nka log sa blog na ito? FYI, hindi komo my nakita kaung flag sa taas eh government-run itong forum na ito.. punta kau mismo sa PRC wag dito, kc sayang lng ang effort nyo...
gusto ng PRC oral na lang ang exam, understamate nyo naman kami. siguro nasa top 10 ako ngayon tapos patay na ang baboy para sa celebration, pero retake na naman. i chalange the PRC oral exam sa araneta col.
would be engineer:
kung gaya mo din lang ang nag top sa board exam na simpleng english composition or spelling eh hindi mo magawa, buti pa nga na mag retake na lng.. patay na ang baboy? wow, sobra kumpiyansa mo dre.. kawawa nman ung baboy, nag sacrifice sa katangahan mo!
to anonymous:
tawagin ba akonh hunghang...
ang liwanag nga e, "shame to those who are downgrading CEs"
CEs ang sinabi ko,
ano ba sinabi ko, NURSE b?
tsk tsk tsk,
things here are not cyclical,
ang dami anonymous d2 na sarap batukan,,
dre... binasa ko previous posts mo ng mga nakaraang araw, obviously ikaw ang nag start mag degrade sa mga NURSE, tapos ngaun eh nagagalit ka sa mga nagde degrade sa mga civil engineer..?
dapat consistent ka dre.. unless nga HUNGHANG ka..
pag gusto nyo binabasa nyo, puro amen kau.. pero pag binabatikos kau, gusto nyo batukan...
kaya dapat lng n mag retake kau.. ang topic is about professionalism..
e di hunghang kung hunghang, wala namang mawawala sa akin, its not a big deal anyways,
basta ang magdowngrade sa CEs, shame on you.
so HUNGHANG na KANIN_tubig (walang ka sense-sense na codename), ayaw na ayaw mo i degrade ang mga CE pero ikaw ang pasimuno ng pang aalipusta sa mga NURSE...
Walang mawawala sa yo dre? for sure... ako walang respeto sayo.. GAGO ka eh..
anonymous,,,look hus talkin? r u talkin bout professionlism? do u know wat that word means?
i pity u,
Professionalism ba kanyo? Sino dito ang sa tingin nila eh professional ang ginawa ng PRC sa takers? Bakit hindi muna nila tingnan ang bakuran nila bago sila mag-declare ng retake? I have nothing against retaking. Ang issue dito, hindi dapat magkaroon ng retake dahil lang madami ang mataas ang nakuha sa isang exam at dahil lang may nahulihan ng leakage/kodigo sa isang room. This happened before sa previous exams ng ibang boards pero walang retake na nangyari.
well, as a professional, dapat nyo tanggapin ang decision ng PRC.. of course after ma observe ung due process.. wag natin i compare ung mga nagdaan na event sa kung ano nangyari ngaun.. komo my leakage nun at wala retake eh dapat same treatment sa inyo..
IM SURE ANG MANGYAYARI LANG SA INYO KATULAD NG GINAWA NILA SA NURSING NOON.
Kahit anong laban ginawa, but look what happen....
NO CHOICE...
Iba talaga my powers noh??????
CE... Prove to all that PRC Officials that you really deserve it.
Yun na lang ang magagawa...
I'm sure PRC will not consider all your demands...
to daniel john..
anu naman ibig mu sabihin na nangyari na to before sa previous exams?
Dude, di naman yata tama yun. Tanggapin namin ang decision na hindi naman kaming mga examinees ang nagkamali? Dude, bakit di nila nabanggit yung mga error sa Design na exam? Hindi sa pagmamayabang pero madali naman talaga ang Hydro na binigay nila. Hindi ba nila nakita yun? Ngayon sasabihin nila na madami ang mataas ang score sa Hydro.
OO nga daniel john,
kung nangyari na to ng nagdaan exam, bakit ngaun nyo lng yan sinasabi.. gusto nyo i uphold ang CE profession pero gumagawa nman kau ng mga issue na makakasira sa CE..
So tradition na pala yan, GANUN B?
I'm sure may nahulihan na ng mga kodigo sa mga previous board exams. Pero wala tayong nakitang retake sa mga exams na yun.
TO ALL CE RE-TAKERS...
PARA SKIN UNFAIR ANG GINAWA SA INYU NG PRC... CIVIL DIN AKO KAYA NAIINTINDIHAN KO KAYO...PERO DAHIL SA PALAKASAN NALANG ANG NANGYAYARI SA GOBYERNO NATIN.. PALAGAY KO HINDI NA MABABAGO ANG DESISYUN NG PRC..... AADVISED KO NALANG IPAKITA NYU NA TALAGANG MAGAGALING ANG BATCH NOV 2007.. AT K8 ILANG RETAKE PA GAWIN NILA EH MATATAAS PARIN KAYO... TANGAPIN NA NILA NA KAYANG KAYA NYO ANG MGA BINIGAY NG MGA EXAMINER...... GUDLUCK GUYS.
CE.raN21
Dude, sa tono mo eh kaming lahat nandaya sa exams. I don't think kelangan ng kodigo para pumasa lang. I have principles dude kaya nga disappointed ako. Dalawang katao lang ang nagpasabit sa aming lahat. It always happens to board exams. Saan ba galing ang mga leakage? Di ba sa PRC din dahil dun galing ang mga questions?
mga walahiya mga taga prc...lahat pinahihirapan kahit mga nurse di pa nakuntento dinamamy pa engr
wlanghya kayo! pati PRC sinisisi nio s gnagawa nio kabulastugan! mag-exam kc kayo ng natural, walang daya! talaga kayo, oo, kayo nga! CE p nmn nturingan! Exam lng, nireretake at dinadaya pa! napakadali kyang magreview! Try nio!!!
ok?
VERY WELL SAID, Ms. Kathleen Rivero
AMEN.. that would be a very good position paper that the CE examinees should have to persuade the PRC and the CE Board to reconsider their decision.
NOVEMBER 2007 CIVIL ENGINEERING LICENSURE EXAM RETAKE:
IS IT FAIR?
This is in reaction to the Professional Regulations Commission’s decision to have the civil engineering licensure examinees who took the controversial examination last Nov. 17-18, 2007 retake two parts (the Hydraulics and Geotechnical Engineering & Structural Engineering and Construction parts) of the exam after it discovered “irregularities” in the results. As reported today, November 28, 2007, in The Manila Times’s online publication (www.manilatimes.net), the commission said that the examination results in the aforementioned subjects were “statistically improbable,” referring to the “unusually” high grades the examinees were able achieve. As reported also, another reason for the said decision of the commission was during the Structural Engineering and Construction part of the exam, two examinees were caught in possession of mobile phones, which were then confiscated by an agent of the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI). They said they have discovered that one of the mobile phones contained answers to 30 examination questions wherein 21 answers were found to be correct.
A total of 4,782 examinees took the controversial licensure examination in eight test centers nationwide. And because of these facts, 4,780 of them are now suffering the consequences of endless anxiety, not to mention the considerable dent the commission’s decision could have in their future.
Let’s now take the first point of contention into perspective. It is not the fault of the examinees that the examination was “easy” as the commission is claiming, alluding to the fact that they scored “unusually” high in the two areas which the commission feels they should retake. They said it is “statistically improbable” to gain such results. It is not the fault of the examinees that the exam was easy! It was not the fault of the examinees that they scored high! The commission should have given it a very thorough run-through before they administered the examination. So what are they trying to say? Are they saying that if more than half of the examinees fail, then it is normal, but if majority passed, then it is not normal? No wonder the writer of Desperate Housewives, in reference to the controversial line uttered by Teri Hatcher, one of the lead characters of the hit television series, was able to conjure the scene in the series that triggered the ire of the whole medical community of the Philippines. The agency – rather, a number of people that is part of the agency that regulates this country’s professionals – are not credible, not to mention unethical. This fiasco is very reminiscent, yes, of the June 2006 nursing board examinations wherein it was investigated that there was a leakage in some parts of the exam, hence the examinees were asked to retake the affected parts early this year. But it is very different. Whereas the nursing examination was nullified due to examination leakages alone, this one was nullified because it was “too easy,” as one of the reasons were made out to be.
Now let’s dissect the fact that two examinees were caught with mobile phones, amongst which, one was discovered containing answers to 30 examination questions. Twenty-one (21) of the answers were correct. First and foremost, as stated in item number 6 of the “9 IMPORTANT REMINDERS AND INSTRUCTIONS TO APPLICANT EXAMINEES - ACTS OF CHEATING” part of the examination programme (or whatever it is called) which was given by the PRC to the examinees before the examination, the consequence of these acts, namely “use of codigos, cellular phones, beepers, programmable calculators, communication with anyone by means of words, signs, gestures, codes and similar acts” will have the corresponding consequence of “CANCELLATION of examination papers and SUSPENSION for two (2) years.” If the questions and answers were examination leakages, as well as the possession of a mobile phone during the examination cheating, then only the two (2) examinees caught should have to bear the consequences of their actions and not the remaining 4,780 of them. Another thing to consider is that if they say the 30 questions with the 21 correct answers are leakages, then the NBI should have found 30 correct answers to the 30 questions that were found on the mobile phone. But, again, this is not the case. Only 21 of the answers were. They disregarded the possibility that since, as they said, the examination was easy, the examinee with the controversial mobile phone, since he or she was able to get into the examination room with it, finished the part much earlier than the allotted time and was just taking note of the questions and his or her answers to check after the exam if his or her answers were correct. This contention alone should be investigated thoroughly. Also, they should be named so as to be able to gauge the truth of the cheating allegations since not only them but the rest of the examinees are affected by their actions. The rest of them deserve to know.
My brother is one of the unlucky ones who spent more than half of their daily routine since they graduated early this year studying and reviewing and aiming to have their licenses this November. I was able to see the unbelievable amount of time and effort that he has spent just trying to master everything to be prepared and to pass the examinations with flying colors. Everything was put on hold for him just to be able to give his best to this examination, aspiring to be one of the top performers for this November’s batch. He was anticipating with mixed emotions the results of this exam, as I believe most of the examinees who took the examination in good faith also did, only to find out that it would be meted out with this very unfair decision. Their futures are now precariously balanced.
On January 12, 2008, the date that the examination retake is scheduled, more than half (65 percent) of the examination will be retaken. This is still too far in the future, and a lot of opportunities, not to mention self-esteem, will be lost in this period of time. I say, as I believe a lot of you would second, that the PRC’s decision should be reviewed thoroughly in all aspects because it is so NOT FAIR to be basing their decisions just because the examination results were “unusually high” and because of the mere two (2) violators of the “mobile phones not allowed” rule of the exam proper since, in the first place, they should have been able to prevent these from happening.
CE for LIfe:
Do you really believe na lahat ng kumuha ng nov 07 ce board eh nandaya?
That is what we call "statistically improbable"
so wag ka mag generalize, pede?
NUEVA ECIJA UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY- Cabanatuan City
GO KAYA NYO YAN...
PROVE THEM NA KAYA NYO YUN....
BELIEVE IN THE POWER OF KARMA...
TO PRC:
KAU ANG NAGPAPABABA NG CREDIBILIDAD NG MGA FUTURE PROFESSIONALS.
TAO DIN KAU NAGKAKAMALI. AT SA PAGKAKATAONG ITO, KAHIT PAGBALIBALIGTARIN.....
MALI KAU...
Di nyo man lang inisip un mga sacrifices ng mga examinees.
Di man mabasa ng PRC ang mga msgs dito, at least we express our feelings at malaman ng buong mundo ang anomalies na kayang gawin ng PRC.Iba pa rin talaga ang my kapangyarihan... kaya walang asenso ang mga PILIPIno sa sariling bansa, It's because kpwa Pilipino nagpapabagsak sa kapwa nya.
ANO B YN PRC? PNAPAPANGIT NYO LALO SISTEMA D2 SA PILIPINAS..... SORY TO SAY WALANG KWENTA ANO NLNG MASASABI NG IBANG BANSA? DB CREDIBILIDAD NTNG LAHAT ANG NAKASALALY D2,HINDI LNG ANG CE COMMUNITY.
TO ALL PRC EMPLOYEE:
PWEDE BNG MAGING MABAIT NMN KYO MGA ______________SHIT!!!!!!!!
AKALA NYO KUNG CNO KYO
I totally agree Kathleen. That's also how I and the rest of the takers feel.
Kakahiya naman sa ating propesyon..mga inhenyero nangongopya!!(sa iilan lang) dinudumihan nyo ang karangalan ng propesyong ito.. Patunayan nyo mga ce grad na d kau natatakot sa anu mang retake...kahit ilang retake pa yan f talagang worthy kau and totoong me natutunan kau sa pag aaral nyo kaya nyo yan!!!maipapasa nyo yan kung me alam talaga kau!!kahit anung ce problem kayang sagutan,yan tinuro sa atin eh.pabalik2 lang formula sa pag analisa at talento lang yan!! f may retake mas mainam kung madaliin keysa patagalin at lumaki ang isyu..kawawa naman ang batch nyo f matulad sa kontrobersya na nangyari sa nursing...
C.E.
VERY WELL SAID, Ms. Kathleen
AMEN.. that would be a very good position paper that the CE examinees should have to persuade the PRC and the CE Board to reconsider their decision.
Sure, we'll go for the retake. No problem with that. But for the right reasons. I don't think PRC gave the right reasons for the retake. It just reflected their lapses, not ours.
CE Batch 96:
Well, im not telling that all examiners did something fishy during that exam. What I want to say is Be Professional in taking those kind of easy exams
Think of it, is it possible for PRC to judge that kind of suspicious action without thinking what would be the result for them? If you think your time has been wasted, then more of it was wasted from PRC? Get it?
Exams are easy if you only review it!
guys tama na yang bangayan nyu pasasaan ba at magiging myembro din kayu ng engr sa bansa... cheer up..............
engr randy p.,christian r.,maricel s.erminio p. pia z.ruel d........
Pinapaulit ng PRC ang exam dahil napagtanto nila na easy nga yung exam sa Hydro at madami ang mataas ang score. Yung nahulihan ng kodigo/leakage, isolated case yun. Dapat sila lang. Unfair naman sa amin na nagtake with full honesty.
Hay SOP lng yan! Kasalanan ng isa, kasalanan ng lahat!!!
Dude, malinaw na nakasaad sa guidelines ng PRC na kapag nahulihan ng leakage, banned na sa board exam. Walang sinabi dun na retake so hindi applicable dun ang kasalanan ng isa, kasalanan ng lahat. It would be very unethical.
daniel...
do you think na hindi kumalat yun at sigurado ba kayu na dalawa lang ang nakinabang ng leakage.. cge nga..
Hay nko.. mliwngn n ang lht.. llo n ang PRC.. ky wlng umasenso d2 s pilipinas kz dhil s inio mga wlngkwentng algd ng gobyerno.. Lgi nio inunder estimate ang mga pilipino.. Gnyn b dpt nio gwin hil s mrming ndlian s EXAM.. Oh c'mon, PRC.. wg nio ipg dimot ang mga bgy n tlgng pnghirapn.. Plibhas kz wl kayong mga considertion..
at pa su CE for Life kinkmpihan mo p ang PRC, wl k din consideration s iba.. mga mksrile ku.. Damn...
Post a Comment