Civil Engineering Licensure Examination Top-notchers January 2008
1st Placer:
KRYZEL APDIAN SUBANG - Mapua Institute of Technology - 96.50
2nd Placer:
ABDEL JHUNALEX ARINDIG ESCANDER - Mindanao State University-Marawi - 94.75
3rd Placer:
RAJED REMEGIO MAGLINTE - Garcia College of Technology - 94.80
4th Placer:
KRIS NOWELL POLO JASME - Eastern Visayas University-Tacloban - 94.40
5th Placer:
MA THERESA YAGUEL OJEDA - Ateneo De Naga - 94.00
6th Placers:
JEFFREY PILOTON CIMAGALA - University of the East-Caloocan - 93.90
JONATHAN OAÑA EMPAMANO - University of the Philippines-Los Baños - 93.90
REYSAN CABALLERO GONZALES - Bulacan State University - 93.90
NEMAR MORALES OBOD - University of Sto. Thomas - 93.90
LEINDJIEL ESTEBAN SICAT - Technological University of the Philippines-Manila - 93.90
7th Placer:
PATRICK BABARAN CANCERAN - University of Saint Louis-Tuguegarao - 93.55
8th Placers:
MICHAEL MOJICA CADATAL - Polytechnic University Of The Philippines-Main-Sta. Mesa - 93.20
JENNIBETH PARRONE MARQUEZ - Mapua Institute Of Technology - 93.20
9th Placer:
GLENN GIL DAVID TAMAYO - University Of The Philippines-Los Baños - 93.00
10th Placer:
RONNEL BARREDO GIANAN - Catanduanes State Colleges-Virac - 92.85
TOP PERFORMING SCHOOLS (with 10 ore more examinees):
1st Place:
University of the Philippines – Los Baños:29/29 - 100.00%
2nd Place:
Ateneo de Naga:14/17 - 82.00%
3rd Place:
University of Santo Tomas: 64 /51 - 80.00%
Isabela State University-Ilagan:10/8 - 80.00%
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 2 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
1 ABADESA, HEIDI DELLOVA
2 ABALOS, MARVIN GARNACE
3 ABARQUEZ, JULITO LABALAN
4 ABAYA, REYNULFO JR TUNGKUL
5 ABAYABAY, NORMAN WILFRED GODINEZ
6 ABAYON, JOY FATIMA JACOBO
7 ABDULLAH, ASHNAIRA ANGAGAO
8 ABEDEJOS, SALVADOR JR ITEM
9 ABEJO, ABEGAIL REGALADO
10 ABELA, LARRY FLORES
11 ABELLA, JENIFER MENDEZ
12 ABELLA, MARIE BERNADETTE ARMANDO
13 ABELLA, MARIE FE ENRIQUEZ
14 ABELLO, KAROL HOBANIL
15 ABENIDO, JUNRY BENECIO
16 ABERGOS, ARIS CO
17 ABIERA, LEIZEL APUYAN
18 ABIQUE, JULIUS DELA CRUZ
19 ABLAZA, ELADIO III CAROLINA
20 ABREU, JEFFREY DELAPA
21 ABUAN, JACQUELYN APAT
22 ABUDA, FELOMINO JR LACDO-O
23 ABUELA, JOAN OMBAO
24 ABUNDO, JENNIFER DE VERA
25 ACELO, EUFEMIO JR IRADIEL
26 ACIBAR, JAMES LEE TABON
27 ACLAN, MARLON DAGAANG
28 ACORDA, EZTELA PELAGIO
29 ACORDA, PRECIOUS PEARL CALAPUTU
30 ACOSTA, CHRISTIAN BALAIS
31 ACOSTA, MARK ANTHONY EVANGELISTA
32 ADAO, WILSON BALMACEDA
33 ADOR, JOSEPH BANGA
34 ADRIANO, ANGELICA EMBALLA
35 ADRIANO, CHARDIE GALANG
36 AFRICA, WILFREDO JR SANCHEZ
37 AGACIA, RAY RONALD ACOSTA
38 AGACID, RICHARD LOUIE DEJANIO
39 AGAR, MICHAEL GUIAMAN
40 AGBAS, KIM SOLAJO
41 AGCAMARAN, MARCELO JR TEJADA
42 AGCAOILI, HEHERSON LINTAG
43 AGCAOILI, NEIL IAN AGBAYANI
44 AGIAS, RONELYN BUBUTAN
45 AGLIAM, NOEL JOSE
46 AGNER, ANTHONY LAMBRINTO
47 AGRAMON, HERBERT ARISTEO CUMLAT
48 AGUB, MARIA ROCHELLE PINSON
49 AGUILAR, ANEL PATRICK MOLINA
50 AGUILAR, FERNANDO CANES
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 3 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
51 AGUINALDO, JERVIN RIEGO
52 AGUSTIN, ARLENE DELA CRUZ
53 AGUSTIN, REYNALDO JR BAUTISTA
54 AGUSTINES, EDWARD DELA CRUZ
55 AGWAYAWAY, MC NEIL PUMARAS
56 AJERO, MICHAEL CHAN
57 AJIDO, EXEQUIEL JR MASIRAG
58 ALABANZA, DANNY MARAVILLA
59 ALAMA, ROSEMIA RASCAL
60 ALARCIO, DEVIJAH MENDOZA
61 ALAVA, JHONEL ENCINAS
62 ALAWI, ABDUL GAFFUR DIAMPUAN
63 ALBOS, NIZEFORA MIRAN
64 ALCALA, LEONARD SAAVEDRA
65 ALCANTARA, JED UMALI
66 ALCORIZA, GLAZA GARCIA
67 ALDAY, CRIS DIZON
68 ALEJANDRO, EDISON CASTILLO
69 ALEJANDRO, MA AILEEN BOCO
70 ALIGUYON, NELSON JR TAGUINAY
71 ALINIANTE, NORVIN TEDRIA
72 ALMIROL, NOEL HUFALAR
73 ALMOJUELA, NIKKI SOCITO
74 ALQUEZA, RODOLFO JR APARICIO
75 ALULOD, HAZEL PORTERA
76 ALVARAN, LIEZL SERMESE
77 ALVAREZ, JAIME JR TORRIFIEL
78 ALVAREZ, MARK JOHNSON BAG-AO
79 ALVAREZ, RICKY LULAB
80 ALVENDIA, DENVER ORBILLO
81 ALVIOLA, RO JOHN VIVARES
82 ALZAGA, CHRISTIAN MANUEL GOGOLA
83 AMARADO, GIOVANI FAJARDO
84 AMARO, RYAN TORALDE
85 AMER, ABDULJABAR DERON
86 AMER, MOAMAR MATUAN
87 AMION, LOUIE DIZON
88 AMOGAWIN, KARL STEPHEN RAMIREZ
89 AMORA, SERGIO III LACANG
90 AMOYO, JON-JON AVILA
91 ANABO, JIMMY JR ESPARAGOZA
92 ANAÑO, CHRISTAN DESTURA
93 ANAÑO, JANOUPHER RAY DESTURA
94 ANCHETA, JUVI MAR CALAPIT
95 ANCLA, VAN SHEM MAGNO
96 ANDRADA, MARICEL DOMINGO
97 ANG, KENNETH RYAN YU
98 ANG, MARVIN DARYL ZORILLA
99 ANGEL, LAICHEN ALFONSO ILACAD
100 ANGELES, ARNEL CHENG
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 4 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
101 ANGELES, BENSON JAMES DIMAALA
102 ANGOT, DIOMEDES DAGUMAN
103 ANTAO, HUSIEN AMUD
104 ANTIOQUIA, ROSALIN TABANAO
105 ANTO, ANDREW CAHATIAN
106 ANTONIO, JOHN RYAN AMPIL
107 ANYAYAHAN, SHARMAINE MERCADO
108 APARICIO, RANDEL DEV PETALCORIN
109 APILADO, MARGIE LOU SERRANO
110 APOSTOL, VENRICK SERRANO
111 AQUINO, ALLAN AGBUYA
112 AQUINO, GERALD ORTIZ
113 AQUINO, JOSEPHUS QUITO
114 AQUINO, MARIA KATRINA CABUGOS
115 ARAGON, JOHN RAYMOND OCAMPO
116 ARAM, RUDEL RABUYA
117 ARANAS, JOEMAR ALBERTO
118 ARBO, FRANCIS LYNDON JR RIÑON
119 ARCE, PHILIP RENLOI DIMAUNAHAN
120 ARCE, VINCENT PANIZARES
121 ARCIAGA, AR-BI AGLORO
122 ARELLANO, ANNABELLE APOCAY
123 ARELLANO, LEILANI SANTIAGO
124 ARIAS, JULIUS JOHN MUSA
125 AROCENA, RALPH DARWIN RAMOS
126 ARRIOLA, PATRICK BERMUDEZ
127 ARROYO, MARK ROBINSON ULANDEZ
128 ASAMA, JEREMY TORIO
129 ASENIERO, MARBEN PAGHASIAN
130 ASI, RECIALYNE ASI
131 ASIS, CONSTANTE LOPEZ
132 ASPILAN, DAISY ANGANAYON
133 ASUNCION, ROMEO JR CABIG
134 ASUNCION, SONNY ASTILLERO
135 ATANOSO, CYRILL CARREON
136 ATUTUBO, ANN MARGARET ABAT
137 AURELIO, SEMANTHA CHESCA CORPUZ
138 AURESTILA, RON MARK CANOBIS
139 AVILA, ALBERT JR VILOG
140 AVILA, WENDELL CRUZ
141 AZARCON, RANDY LOPE DAVID
142 AZUL, MARK ANTHONY TENA
143 AZUR, ALBERT ANDREW RETANAL
144 BAAY, ANDRO JOHN RAFER
145 BACAL, RONALD CASTILLO
146 BACANI, HAZEL ANN LICUDINE
147 BADAJOS, CHRISTIAN JEFF FLORES
148 BADAJOS, MARY JOY CATABAY
149 BADUA, JONEL CABANIG
150 BADURIA, DANIEL BILON
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 5 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
151 BAGAOISAN, ONDEE GADO
152 BAGAT, JOHN ALLAN INDAYA
153 BAGNOL, CARLO ESTRELLANTE
154 BAGORIO, GEOVANNIE BALISALISA
155 BAGUE, EDSEL TRISTAN WONG
156 BAGWEL, QUIMSON SALVADOR
157 BAHATAN, SHERWIN JAY GANACA
158 BALAIBO, JENNY GAY CASABUENA
159 BALAN, KENNETH JAYSON ANDAL
160 BALAUAG, CHRISTOPHER CARAM
161 BALAWEN, JULIUS AGUIGUID
162 BALBOA, LESTER YULO
163 BALDECAÑAS, FORTUNATO ABONG
164 BALDOMERO, ROQUE DELA ROSA
165 BALGOS, MYAN MANCE
166 BALINTONG, ROSALINA BOBARES
167 BALISI, VIRGILIO JR BUTAY
168 BALLETA, GREGORIO JR MONTEJO
169 BALMADRID, JOHN ANDREW TACORDA
170 BALMES, IAN JASON MAYOR
171 BALUYUT, PAUL BENJIE SAMBAT
172 BALVERDE, RUEL GARCIA
173 BANATE, DEXTER SISON
174 BANDA, CRISOSTOMO JR GESMUNDO
175 BANDIBAS, KRISTINE CARMELLE OLARTE
176 BANDIOLA, DIOSEPHER JR BOMALAY
177 BANGAHON, IVY ALIVIO
178 BANGUG, SALVADOR JR MARAMAG
179 BAQUIRAN, MICHELLE TAGUBA
180 BARBOSA, JOSE SERVACIO BELENO
181 BARCENA, JULIUS PETERSON CADIZ
182 BARENG, EDSAINT MARC LICYAYO
183 BARIA, EROLL MARLO AFABLE
184 BARQUIN, IAN TED MOLABOLA
185 BARRAMEDA, DIVINA FRANCIA TEODORICO
186 BARRERA, JELYN REBOLLOS
187 BARRIOS, BANISARD CORDITA
188 BARRIOS, REEMAN VILLAR
189 BARTOLOME, ALBERT CAALIM
190 BARTOLOME, DANIEL ORTEGA
191 BARTOLOME, GAY LORD AGUILAR
192 BASANGAN, ALEXIS SYLVESTER ECHALAR
193 BASAR, SHYFUDEN USMAN
194 BASAS, ARMANDO TADENA
195 BASBAS, BERNARD PHILIP HUFANA
196 BASILAN, BERMON GUMPAL
197 BATANG, RICHARD UY
198 BATTUNG, JOYCE MARIE TURINGAN
199 BAUTISTA, HERMINIO ELVIR JR BUENCAMINO
200 BAUTISTA, NORMAN SANTOS
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 6 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
201 BAUTISTA, RYAN DE VERA
202 BAWAAN, FRENZEL SIBAYAN
203 BAWING, HARRY AP-APID
204 BAYGAN, CRISTOPHER CALAM
205 BAYONA, SAMMY CATEDRAL
206 BELLEZA, JAY ANN COMPUESTO
207 BENDAL, MANUEL JR MURCHANTE
208 BENGAN, RAMIE LLOYD CAOILE
209 BEREÑA, MARVIN TUPAZ
210 BERGONIA, RIO CARLO INSORIO
211 BERMEJO, BILLY RAY CAFE
212 BERMEJO, JAY JOSEPH BACAY
213 BERMEJO, JOSEPH VINCENT COBALLES
214 BERNABEO, BERNARD MAWILI
215 BERNAL, MEADE BELLE RAMOS
216 BERNARDO, JOANA MARIE FABIAN
217 BERNARDO, RHEYMOND ALVAREZ
218 BERSAMINA, JUAN PAULO LABONG
219 BERTULFO, IAN BAGTINDON
220 BESANA, GARRY LOMOTOS
221 BESINGA, VINA VANESSA BALAIS
222 BETITA, JOSE MARIA ALVAREZ
223 BETONIO, JIMSON ESPINOZA
224 BIALA, ROMMEL DELUNA
225 BIANTAN, AIRENE HOPE PACIFICAR
226 BIDO, JONATHAN TOBES
227 BINLAYAN, FEDLYN HINNANG
228 BIOLANGO, JEFFREY GUANCO
229 BLAZA, ZYAN IRIZ MARIANO
230 BOGNOT, KAREN DUNGCA
231 BOLOGA, ELBERT JOHN LEAÑO
232 BOLOTAOLO, EDGAR OLAER
233 BOMPAT, MARIA THERESA MANABAT
234 BONCAVIL, MELISSA FRANCO
235 BONDACO, MAC KENLY FAUSTINO
236 BONDAD, JONATHAN ONERA
237 BONIFACIO, VLADIMIR HERNANDEZ
238 BORJA, MARTY LUMACTOD
239 BORLAGDAN, ROSARIO-SALOME VALENCIA
240 BORRE, ANDREA BARBA
241 BOSE, HERMO ANTHONY BAUTISTA
242 BOTONA, HANZEL TOLDO
243 BRANDES, MILEEN CATINDIG
244 BRANZUELA, ARNEL AGRAVANTE
245 BRAVO, SER ANTHONY NOCASA
246 BRIOL, JAYSON TAN
247 BRIONES, ROCELYN BAUTISTA
248 BUAN, JOSEPH ALPHONSE LACSAMANA
249 BUDO, GEORGE MICHAEL TABAY
250 BUDUAN, PAUL MICHAEL MALASIG
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 7 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
251 BUENA, IVANHOE RAY ESPLANA
252 BUENAOBRA, JOY PEREZ
253 BUENAVISTA, NATASHA EUNICE MAÑOSCA
254 BUENVIAJE, CHARLES REGINALD CALALUAN
255 BUFETE, ALVIN RAZON
256 BUGAIS, JOVENNE ALMOSA
257 BULFANE, CINDY HINALINAN
258 BULORON, CRISTOPHER ALEXIS CATAYLO
259 BUMIDANG, JANICE JOYCE BUYAYO
260 BUNAG, REDEN GUMARAC
261 BUNDALIAN, ALAN BARON
262 BURCE, CHARLYN BUENO
263 BURLASA, RYAN OBONGEN
264 BUSCAS, RENCIS VICENTE
265 BUSTAMANTE, JEFFREY BERAS
266 BUSTILLOS, RICARDO JR PABUNAN
267 BUTAYA, JERANIE VILLEGAS
268 BUTENG, MARK LAYABAN
269 BUYAGAN, MURPHY AYYAWAN
270 CABABAT, ANTONIO JR MADAYAG
271 CABADING, ALLEN JAMES BAUTISTA
272 CABAEL, NIFJAN FLOSA
273 CABALAR, PATRICK MUNAR
274 CABALLERO, LIMUEL LEODONES
275 CABALLES, RANDY ALMONTERO
276 CABARGA, JAYSON SIBONGA
277 CABEL, KARLO TORRES
278 CABELLO, JEREMY RACHELLE PALOR
279 CABOCAN, DEXTER TAMAYAO
280 CABOS, FRANCEL ABLETES
281 CABRAL, MAYBELOUISE ANNE SALENGA
282 CABRERA, ROSEMARIE CASTILLO
283 CABREROS, KALVIN SAN GABRIEL
284 CABUGAO, ROALD JASON QUIROS
285 CABUHAT, PHILIP VELARDE
286 CABULONG, LORVILLE TUBIG
287 CABUSAS, ARGIE ASAYAS
288 CACAYAN, RALEIGH WAYNE PALENCIA
289 CACDAC, EDISON FLORA
290 CADA, CHRISTIAN ELLOSO
291 CADATAL, MICHAEL MOJICA
292 CADILENA, LAMBERT MOLINA
293 CADIZ, JHESON REGANIAN
294 CADORNA, GEIL ANNE SIBAYAN
295 CAGA-ANAN, JOE BEN FLORES
296 CAGAS, JULIUS EDISON AMPARO
297 CAGUINGIN, MARJORIE MAGPAYO
298 CAGUITLA, ROLLIE TESNADO
299 CAIDET, MELVIN BALASABAS
300 CAJANO, GIRLIE SERDAN
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 8 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
301 CAJAYON, GODFREY BRYAN SEROJE
302 CAJES, CHARLESFORD PASCUAL
303 CALACAR, JOHNVER CABUGSA
304 CALANDRIA, RICHELLE DELA TORRE
305 CALARA, EDMON TORRES
306 CALDERON, CARL LAURENCE DAYAG
307 CALICDAN, ANNA LIZA CERDONIO
308 CALIPUSAN, CLIFFORD ABAPO
309 CALIPUSAN, ROMMY FERNANDEZ
310 CALIXTO, JAQUILYN CONTES
311 CALLEJA, JALERMINE EVIE MILANO
312 CALPAHI, JIL DUPINGAY
313 CALSADO, MICHAEL BERDOS
314 CAMARINES, ARIANNE JOY ISIDORO
315 CAMASA, MICHAEL ESCANA
316 CAMPOS, RICO ROMBAOA
317 CANAL, CHERRY ANN MARIANO
318 CANAPI, JESUS JR ABAOAG
319 CANCERAN, PATRICK BABARAN
320 CANDELARIA, ALLAN CASTILLA
321 CANIVEL, ARVY SICAT
322 CANLAS, ALVIN MACALINO
323 CANLAS, CLOYD MARK AQUINO
324 CANLAS, JOHN KENNEDY RODRIGUEZ
325 CANLAS, JOY DAMPIL
326 CANLAS, ROGER SANCHEZ
327 CANO, NOEL SALCEDA
328 CANO, PAOLO MIGUEL PIZARRO
329 CANONERO, MARIEL DAVID
330 CANUTO, JAYSON BERCASIO
331 CAPANGPANGAN, RYAN GARADO
332 CAPE, ARGIE CODILLA
333 CAPITO, EMMIE LOU PAHALLA
334 CAPUCHINO, MARICON MODALES
335 CARABALLO, WILMA DOMOGMA
336 CARDIJON, DEXTER TAPALLA
337 CARIÑO, JERUSALEM ABUAN
338 CARLOS, CAROLYN TEQUILLO
339 CARLOS, JOHN CHRISTIAN TAYAG
340 CARREON, MARICRIS HERNANDEZ
341 CARREON, RAYMOND CORTEZ
342 CARRIEDO, JEANTIAN KATHLYN VILLANUEVA
343 CAS, EDISON II AWA
344 CASELA, MON JEROME GAT-EB
345 CASIANO, RODMAR SORIA
346 CASPE, MARK JELIUS CACHO
347 CASTANEDA, BENJAMIN JR TERRADO
348 CASTEJON, MARK JOERIC REPAYO
349 CASTIDAD, MARCHEL SORALLO
350 CASTIGADOR, ANDRIAN RAMONES
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 9 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
351 CASTILLANO, PHILIP JOHN PASION
352 CASTILLO, EFREN LABOGEN
353 CASTOR, WILMAR PAGAPULAN
354 CAUILAN, ESVIMY DELIQUEÑA
355 CAUNCA, ERVIE JUMBAS
356 CAVANIS, JOHNER DEQUERO
357 CAVIZO, EDWARD ALBERT CASTILLEJOS
358 CAWIS, BRAILLE ALUYEN
359 CAYETANO, LIEZEL DELA CRUZ
360 CAÑAVERAS, JULIUS PASCUA
361 CAÑETE, JONATHAN RAMOS
362 CELERES, LYNITH AMORA
363 CELESTE, OLIVER TERUEL
364 CEPE, CLARK NEON II PLANDES
365 CHAN, MELCHOR GATMAITAN
366 CHAVEZ, MARK JAYSON SUNGA
367 CHENG, WILLY TRIGUEROS
368 CHOYCAWEN, ANDREW JR LACBAWAN
369 CHUA, CHERRYL NARES
370 CHUA, ROMMEL MESA
371 CHUA, RUDOLPH AARON DALMACIO
372 CIMAGALA, JEFFREY PILOTON
373 CLAMAÑA, BHEVERLY MARANAN
374 CLIMACO, JENILE SALEM
375 CLIMACO, LOUWIE JAY ALARCON
376 CLUA, JHEROL LUSTERIO
377 COBCOBO, JOHNNY ALCIDO
378 COBRADOR, GOLEM ROSATACE
379 COLLADO, MARIA BENEDICTA GUERRERO
380 COLOMA, RHOMMEL DE LOS SANTOS
381 COMENDADOR, JAN CLAUDETTE CALAMBA
382 CONCORDIA, MICIELLE GRACE MIRANDA
383 CONDES, ZARINA WINES
384 CONSTANTINO, ELLEN JOY MARUZZO
385 CONTEMPLACION, ELMOR JR SUIZA
386 CONTIC, SATURNINO BACDOYAN
387 CONZAGA, MENZHIEL GONZALES
388 COPE, JOHN FRANCIS MARIÑAS
389 CORDOBA, SENEN JR GANNOD
390 CORDOVA, MARY JANE MANZANO
391 CORDOVA, NOBEL JULAG-AY
392 CORNEL, DANILO BOLIMA
393 CORTEZ, ERICSON SANCHEZ
394 CORTEZ, JEFFREY GUERRERO
395 COSME, JAN RONELY BANOT
396 COSTALES, CHRISTOPHER BUYAGAWAN
397 CRUZ, AARON CARVAJAL
398 CRUZ, ARTHUR CUNANAN
399 CRUZ, DEANE GRACE PINEDA
400 CRUZ, DENIS JERIC BUGARIN
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 10 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
401 CRUZ, FREDERICK LINSANGAN
402 CRUZ, JOHN LESTER ELEQUIN
403 CRUZ, MABELLE LYNN SAN PEDRO
404 CRUZ, NOAH BLAS
405 CUDAL, LYNDEN MADAMBA
406 CULLA, DONNA MAY TORRES
407 CULUBONG, ELLA CHARISSE ORDOÑA
408 CUNANAN, RAY-ANN LAGRIMAS
409 CUNTAPAY, MARK JOSEPH GARCIA
410 CUSI, KRISA ROQUE
411 DAAROL, RAFAEL BUCONG
412 DACANAY, HEDLEY VALERA
413 DACORO, GERALD PERLORA
414 DACQUEL, ROSARIO DUMAGAY
415 DADA, MARY GRACE MANGLAL-LAN
416 DADIVAS, REMAR QUILANTANG
417 DAGAMAC, AHMAD MARILLA
418 DAGUIO, JOSEPH JR TICHAP
419 DALA, GERALD PAUL CAPONES
420 DAMONG, MARSHAL ADANG
421 DANAO, MELVIN ANAS
422 DANDAY, ALIX DOMINIQUE GARCIA
423 DANGANAN, ANTHONY CANLAS
424 DANGLACRUZ, ROWELL SISON
425 DANILA, RICHARD REYES
426 DAPIAWEN, ALDWIN LUTO
427 DAQUIADO, NEIL FRANCIS PEPITO
428 DARANDAS, HASSAN ELESTERIO
429 DATUKON, RN RASHID DILANGALEN
430 DAUGDAUG, BENJAMEN JR GERONDA
431 DAVAD, ARIEL AMISTOSO
432 DAVID, CHARLIE GAIL DEL CARMEN
433 DAVID, GERARD FRANCISCO
434 DAVID, HARRY BATO
435 DAVID, JHONARD MARQUEZ
436 DAVID, MARKWINN LACAR
437 DAVID, PETERPYM DELA CRUZ
438 DAVIS, ANGELA RENEE BAS
439 DAYOT, JERSON MAPANG
440 DE CELIS, MAECHEL MARQUEZ
441 DE GUZMAN, ANTHONY DENNIS VIADO
442 DE GUZMAN, MITCHEL FLORES
443 DE GUZMAN, ROGIE MANALO
444 DE GUZMAN, SHEIN JOSEPH GAITE
445 DE JESUS, MARLON SALENGA
446 DE LA CRUZ, CLAIRE DUCAY
447 DE LA CRUZ, DYAN GULPANE
448 DE LEON, JUAN PAULO TRINIDAD
449 DE LEON, MA KRESA NIRIIS GARCIA
450 DE LEON, MARIA ELIZABETH SILVESTRE
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 11 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
451 DE MANUEL, MICHAEL DONE SABINO
452 DE OLAZO, JAN-ALAIN HILARIO
453 DE ROXAS, ANNALYN CORTEZ
454 DEL MUNDO, ANNA MARIE MERCADO
455 DEL MUNDO, MEL EDWARD ADELAN
456 DEL ROSARIO, CHESTER YANGA
457 DEL ROSARIO, MARIE CARTEL BALAJADIA
458 DELA CRUZ, ALDRIN VIZON
459 DELA CRUZ, ANTHONY ABEL
460 DELA CRUZ, DAISYRE VALERIO
461 DELA CRUZ, JAY-R MARIANO
462 DELA CRUZ, JERWIN ROSAL
463 DELA CRUZ, LUIS TOLENTINO
464 DELA CRUZ, MARY ANN DELA CRUZ
465 DELA CRUZ, NOMERSON AGRA
466 DELA CRUZ, REYNALDO CRUZ
467 DELA CUESTA, MARIA ANA GASCON
468 DELA PEÑA, FRANCISCO JR SEBIDO
469 DELA PEÑA, RYAN DELA ROSA
470 DELFIN, LILLY ANN SAMSON
471 DELIGERO, MELCHISEDECH SALVA
472 DELIGERO, MICHELLE YBAÑEZ
473 DELIMA, DAN CARLO TABLANTE
474 DELLEJERO, JOHN KEVIN CUARTO
475 DEMAFILES, CLARENCE GARGOLLO
476 DEOCAREZA, JENNYLYN CASABA
477 DERIJE, SHARIBEL ABADILLA
478 DESCANZO, ARIS QUIBUYEN
479 DETERA, DANTE IAN MOSO
480 DIALA, MENDY ALVIZ
481 DIANITO, ABETH YLANAN
482 DIAZ, MARCONIE UMIPIG
483 DICEN, DHALIE ESCUADRO
484 DICHOSO, SHIRLEY JUDITH TATUALLA
485 DILLERA, ALFONSO JUAN YAP
486 DIMABUYO, ROSSANA RELUCIO
487 DIMAFILES, JERWIN DABU
488 DIMALANTA, ANNA MARIE GUERZON
489 DIMAUNAHAN, JOHN ERWIN SUBIDA
490 DIMLA, MANUELITO CUNAN
491 DINGLASAN, CHARLIE GELERA
492 DIONES, GILBERT TAMBA
493 DISPULO, JOYCE ANIEL
494 DIWA, ADONNA LUCKIE ROMERO
495 DOLORES, BRYAN AMORIE ASCANO
496 DOMINGO, MARK VINCENT ALARCON
497 DOMINGO, REYMON MANTAL
498 DOMINGO, REYMOND BRIZ
499 DOROPAN, YOLYBETH MADRIGAL
500 DOÑOS, DEO ACODESIN
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 12 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
501 DULAY, JOEL ACIERTO
502 DULFO, LUZ CONSUELO ANOS
503 DUMALI, LODIMER RAMOS
504 DUPILAS, OSWALD MARCELO
505 EBAJO, JONATHAN TAGALOG
506 ECLARINO, DOUGLAS II NAPAGAL
507 ECLEO, RONNAFEL FENIZA
508 EDILLOR, MARK VINCENT SODUSTA
509 EFREN, MICHELLE ANGELA PARADO
510 EGADNA, RACHEL LUNAG
511 ELCULLADA, RYAN JAY FEROL
512 ELEVADO, GERALD VERDIN
513 ELIO, VICENTE DE PAUL MACALE
514 ELORDE, RICHARD DOCTOR
515 ELPEDES, MARISTELA OBIS
516 EMPAMANO, JONATHAN OAÑA
517 ENCISA, JOSEL JR BONDOC
518 ENDRACA, ANSELMO JR TONGSON
519 ENOJO, EVELYN OLIS
520 ENTENDEZ, BREX YUTICO
521 ESCANDER, ABDEL JHUNALEX ARINDIG
522 ESCAÑO, BENJAMIN JR AQUINO
523 ESCONDE, WINMARK MANALOTO
524 ESMAEL, NORAISA PENDI
525 ESPAYOS, BOLANDA GARCIA
526 ESPAÑA, KRISTINE DEBB PAMA
527 ESPAÑOL, KARLO JOY ORPIANA
528 ESPAÑOL, PAUL WARREN PACULDO
529 ESPINA, EMMANUEL CARILIMAN
530 ESPINA, RASTY JUMAWAN
531 ESPINOSA, DANNY MAGALLON
532 ESPINOSA, KRISTIAN DELA TORRE
533 ESPLANA, MARISSA CLUTARIO
534 ESTEBAN, MICHELLE LOPEZ
535 ESTIMADA, REYNALDO BAUTISTA
536 ESTOESTA, MICHAEL RONALD DIVINA
537 ESTOLAS, NORMAN CARBONELL
538 ESTORNINOS, RONALD ARIOLA
539 ESTOSE, JOSHUA SOLANA
540 ESTRELLA, ERNESTO JR ARANA
541 ESTRELLA, GABRIEL ANDREW DE VERA
542 ESTRELLA, JOSEPH ELBERT DE GUZMAN
543 ETCUBAN, RIO REZIN JUMAWAN
544 EUGENIO, FROILAN LORENZO
545 EUGENIO, KATHERINE JOYCE IGNACIO
546 EVA, ANALYN PLACER
547 EVARISTO, TRISTAN JOHN QUIZON
548 EYA, ALEXANDER BATO
549 EÑIGO, JUELYN JUMAWAN
Seq. No. N a m e
551 FABITO, BERNARD TOLENTINO
552 FAJEL, ERNIE MORADA
553 FALCESO, MARLON FABELLA
554 FALCUTILA, LAUREANO III FORCA
555 FALLA, CHRIS BAJADA
556 FALLEGA, RICHARD DOCTOLERO
557 FAMISAN, ROSEMARIE DAMASO
558 FAROL, GRACE MANAGDAG
559 FAUNILLO, ARIEL CASARIA
560 FAUSTINO, ARVIN VALERA
561 FAUSTINO, FRANGIE GALANG
562 FEGCAN, ROSALIE GASGA
563 FELIZARDO, SOLOMON VALDERAMA
564 FERRER, ALEX GATCHALIAN
565 FERRER, NORMAN ECHON
566 FETALVER, JAKE DULCE
567 FILLOMENA, SHIERWIN INOCENTE
568 FLORES, GINALYN BARBASO
569 FLORES, GLENMER LACAP
570 FLORES, SHERWYN MARTOS
571 FLORES, XERXES KYLE PABLO
572 FORTES, ALEXANDER JOHN CLEMENTE
573 FRANCIA, JERWIN PRUDENTE
574 FRANCISCO, ALEXANDER TABLADA
575 FRANCISCO, ELIZABETH CANASA
576 FRANCISCO, MANILYN NAPALCRUZ
577 FRIVALDO, AZUL NUÑEZ
578 FRUELDA, ERIC DALISAY
579 FUENTES, CHRISTINE MAE MOISES
580 FULLON, RUEL SALUBRE
581 GA-A, IAN LUGATIMAN
582 GA-AS, GILMHER ARMEJE
583 GAA, GAERLAN GENER
584 GABINETE, JOHN MICHAEL RADOC
585 GACOSCOS, RANDEE PETTEN
586 GADON, MAURICE JR LIM
587 GALAN, MARIANNE LILLO
588 GALANG, CARL VINCENT CHUA
589 GALAY, MARIANNE LLANES
590 GALDONES, DAUPHINE ANGELI CALIBUSO
591 GALLOGO, JIMPOLL ANDRES
592 GALVEZ, LOVELY RACEL MANLAPIG
593 GAMBONG, MARY JESAFE POSTRERO
594 GAMUEDA, JOEBERT GERVACIO
595 GANTIOQUE, PAULA KRISTINA MAMURI
596 GARBIN, FLOBIN FLORES
597 GARCES, LEOPOLDO JR BELLO
598 GARCIA, ARNEL II ARELLANO
599 GARCIA, ERNESTO JR LAUDIT
600 GARCIA, MARCELO GIRON
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 14 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
601 GARCIA, MELVIN PAUL CAPILI
602 GARCIA, RENEBOY MARCIAL
603 GARCIANO, JOSEPH IAN COJAMCO
604 GARDAYA, CHRISTIAN CORPUZ
605 GARONIA, ROY LABAGUIS
606 GASPAR, MICHAEL SALAMAT
607 GATBONTON, MARLON CALMA
608 GATBONTON, RUTH HANNA DEL ROSARIO
609 GATCHALIAN, RHYS CRUZ
610 GATILA, JESSIE TENERIFE
611 GATUS, ELMER SORIANO
612 GAUANG, JOVEN MARIANO
613 GAURANO, DAVID JOSHUA BALABA
614 GAVILAN, ALLEN ANTHONY ARGUELLES
615 GAYTA, CRISTINA MARIE ABAD
616 GEALOGO, LEVI EVANGELISTA
617 GELINDON, MANUELITO MARTOS
618 GENTAPA, ALLEN HANSEL VILLANUEVA
619 GEPANAYAO, GRACE CONDINO
620 GEPILANO, MA VICTORIA GOLLOSO
621 GIANAN, RONNEL BARREDO
622 GIGTENTA, JOEMAR BATILO
623 GILLES, CAROLYN DE JESUS
624 GIRON, WILLIAM MANZANILLA
625 GOLES, MARK ANTHONY TAPAL
626 GOMESERIA, MARK JUN BULAWAN
627 GONZAGA, PAUL FERNANDEZ
628 GONZALES, GENE TABIAN
629 GONZALES, JOSIE PANOPIO
630 GONZALES, MEL HARVEY ASTURIAS
631 GONZALES, REYSAN CABALLERO
632 GONZALVO, SILVESTER SAGAYAGA
633 GOTIS, HENRY JR JULATON
634 GRACILLA, JOHN ANGELO ALARILLA
635 GRADO, DONATO JR ONGCOY
636 GREGORIO, ELLAINE CARILLO
637 GUIBAO, MARIAN JEAN BARAO
638 GUIDOTE, EMMANUEL STEFANO BASKIÑAS
639 GUILAS, ROCKY GUAY
640 GUILING, ABDUL RAFFI LAWI
641 GUINITA, AL BUENAVENTURA III CATAO
642 GUINTO, JOEL LABUNG
643 HABLA, LESLIE GREFALDO
644 HADJI SUCCOR, SOKRIE LOMODAG
645 HAGOS, MARK EDISON DATO
646 HALASAN, JESSIE BAJYENTING
647 HASSAN, KAMAL ADJOK
648 HERMOSURA, HILER JR SISON
649 HERNANDEZ, DULCE SOLIS
650 HERNANDEZ, LOUI MICHAEL MALALUAN
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 15 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
651 HERNANDEZ, NECEMOVA TRINIDAD
652 HERNANDEZ, RONALD REAGAN ATIENZA
653 HERNANDEZ, RYAN EDISON ACAPULCO
654 HIDALGO, WILBERT SANTIANO
655 HILADO, MAENYLL GRACE CUEVAS
656 HILARIO, ALLAN CAMPAÑA
657 HIPE, ALYANNA POTOT
658 HONRADA, OLIVER ESTUISTA
659 IBAG, ARTEMIO BATANG-E
660 IBASCO, JOSE ANDALIS
661 IBATUAN, GIOVANNI TATAD
662 ICAWAT, ARIEL PARONE
663 IDIANG, CHERRY ROSE MARCOS
664 IGNACIO, ESTRELLA PUNO
665 ILAO, BONIFACIO ILAGAN
666 ILAO, RYAN VIVAT
667 ILUZADA, ANABEL MESANA
668 IMATONG, JAN ERLVIN OÑATE
669 IMPERIAL, GLENBERT LABRADA
670 INFANTE, JINKY CATALAN
671 INTAL, ELLEN PARCON
672 IPORAC, MARY GRACE RODRIGUEZ
673 IRINCO, GABRIEL JR LUTO
674 ISIDRO, JAYVEN REYES
675 ISMAEL, DARYL UY
676 ISRAEL, YECHIEL BATUIGAS
677 JACOB, EDMAR BALBIN
678 JACOB, JOSEPH JAZMIN
679 JACOBE, FELICIANO JR DAGAMI
680 JACOSALEM, WILMER MAGBANUA
681 JAGONIA, JOEL ANDING
682 JALLORINA, ALBERT BALAWING
683 JAMBOY, MARICILLE ARADO
684 JAMBOY, MARIFEL ARADO
685 JAMION, FARISIA FRONDA
686 JANDAYAN, BRYAN RAMIREZ
687 JANDOC, JOHN RICHARD SOLEDAD
688 JAQUECA, MARICEL LOGMAO
689 JARABATA, CHONA RUIZ
690 JARANILLA, NANCY CIRENE DORMILE
691 JARON, MARK ANTHONY BENECIRO
692 JASME, KRIS NOWELL POLO
693 JASPE, NOLE TUPAS
694 JAVINEZ, ARNEL DIONCO
695 JONSON, DANILO JR AGNER
696 JOSE, MALVIN HOMO
697 JOSON, PAULO VICENTE TRAQUEÑA
698 JOVEN, JESSIE MAGAT
699 JUCABAN, RAISSA MAE CENAL
700 JUIT, JED TORILLO
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 16 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
701 JULI, JOVEN MAYA
702 JULIAN, DIVINA PACTOL
703 JUMALON, MARLON BALILI
704 JUMAMOY, MA MICHAELA LOGROÑO
705 JUNDARINO, MARITES PALIGUTAN
707 KADA-OL, GINA PULLIS
708 KAHIL, FADZMIN JUMAANI
709 KIAT-ONG, NEIL BANTIC
710 KILAT, RICHMON BALAMBAO
711 LABIANO, REMINGTON BAYSA
712 LACEDA, MA CHRISTINA MARQUEZ
713 LAGAYA, VON PATRICK NANO
714 LAGMAN, REDELYN DELOS ANGELES
715 LAGO, ROSALIE APALE
716 LAMBERTE, DONEZZA JOY URGEL
717 LAMONTE, ROBERT NITORAL
718 LANCERAS, GRACIEL FATIMA MALIHAN
719 LAPEÑA, MARY JOSEPHINE TANGHAL
720 LAPINID, MARISSA BUNAYOG
721 LAPIRA, PATRICK GAMOS
722 LAPPAY, GLENLORD ABALOS
723 LAPUGAN, FREDDIE JR SILAYEN
724 LAPURGA, ANA BELINDA FERNANDEZ
725 LAUREOLA, WILJEIM BALATBAT
726 LAURETA, ROWELL CASCO
727 LAVEGA, EMMANUEL LACAO
728 LAZO, JOEMERIC MANAY
729 LEGASPI, JESSIE AMANTE
730 LEGASPI, MARY GRACE ALMERO
731 LEGASTE, ANA MAE ANGELES
732 LEGRIA, ROLLY ANDAM
733 LEONES, BENJIE VELORIA
734 LERION, ISMAEL GUJILDE
735 LIBAN, SHERWYN AGRAAN
736 LIBUNAO, MARK EDNOR OLTIVEROS
737 LIIS, ERAS KIRK BOCLONGAN
738 LIM, JERRY GUTLAY
739 LIM, RYAN SANTIAGO SO
740 LIMJOCO, LORAINE ANNE LUCENA
741 LIMOS, ROWENA OSORIO
742 LINGON, JOEY MAPACPAC
743 LIPATA, RONALDO BERWICO
744 LITANON, ERIK BERNARDINO
745 LITERAL, JIL SANDER JAEN
746 LLEDO, MARY MELCHA PUYAT
747 LOMOTOS, LOUIEL IAN RASONABE
748 LOQUERE, AMON REY CLAVANO
749 LORENZO, MARVIN TOLENTINO
750 LUCAS, JAN ULYSSES UMALI
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 17 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
751 LUMANLAN, RAYMUND FRANCIS DAVID
752 LUMBO, EDWIN JR OPEÑA
753 LUMEN, CHRISTIAN MAGLOCOT
754 LUNA, CHERRY MAE DORIA
755 LUSICA, ELMER AMPOLOQUIO
756 MAATA, ROMEO VILLARTA
757 MABATAN, MARC DAVIS BURGOS
758 MABEZA, CRISANTO MACALE
759 MABEZA, MERLYN OLIVA
760 MABINI, DYAN ROSS SANGALANG
761 MABISCAY, GEOVANNI PANALIGAN
762 MACA, MA AURORA FELICISIMA GATONG
763 MACADATO, EMADUDDEN MIMBANTAS
764 MACAHIG, MARIA LORDETA RELLOSA
765 MACALE, RUBEN JR TAÑA
766 MACAM, JONATHAN ALAMBRA
767 MACANDAO, DOUGLAS BOMMON-AS
768 MACAPE, JOY DOCTOLERO
769 MACARAIG, MARICEL CHUA
770 MACAUYAG, FAHAD ALI
771 MACEDA, NIMROD BACOSA
772 MACGUI-ING, BUGNOSEN BATINGWED
773 MACLANG, MA CHRISTINA GRACIA VENTURA
774 MACMAC, MELODY DENSULA
775 MACUGAY, MERYCHIE YARTE
776 MADIA, JESON CABALQUINTO
777 MADRIO, JUN MAR PAMILAR
778 MAGBANUA, HYACINTH NARCISO
779 MAGBANUA, JAN VINCENT GABUCO
780 MAGBUHOS, RAYMOND ARANZADO
781 MAGISTRADO, NIDA NACARIO
782 MAGLANTAY, MARGIE TUMACA
783 MAGLAQUI, LIMWELL LIMPIN
784 MAGLENTE, PAUL SIMON BANIEL
785 MAGLINTE, RAJED REMEGIO
786 MAGNAYE, FERNANDO LUSTERIO
787 MAGNO, KIMBERLY JOYCE MANALANSAN
788 MAGNO, RICHARD BAGCAL
789 MAGPANTAY, MA AIZA MILLARE
790 MAGTANONG, MARY ANN CANARE
791 MAJOMETANO, ALFREDO CUNA
792 MALAPIT, MONARCH JAMES RUMINGQUET
793 MALGAPO, LEROY SANTOS
794 MALIGMAT, MA GRACE CABIG
795 MALING, MICHAEL SANDUKAN
796 MALLARI, JOSEPH GOMEZ
797 MALPAL, MARK ANGELO JASA
798 MAMARIL, PHEBY BANGAHON
799 MAMPUSTI, FAITH CHERRYLE LABAY
800 MAMUCUD, AROLD AGAPITO
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 18 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
801 MANABAT, MARK ANTHONY CASTRO
802 MANANQUIL, DANIEL HUBAY
803 MANDAC, SIMEON MOTOL
804 MANDITA, LENY SELDA
805 MANGORSI, DAISY JEAN TAMBA
806 MANIS, FREEMAN TAQUED
807 MANLANGIT, AL MARTIN RULE
808 MANLANGIT, MARK JAYSON UMOTOY
809 MANOG, ALVIN JAMORA
810 MANOG, MELISSA GRECIA DELA CRUZ
811 MANTALA, MANUELITO MEAMO
812 MANUBAG, EVELIO CANTAL
813 MANUEL, MARK ANTHONY LEONES
814 MANUEL, RALPH EDWARD LOTERTE
815 MARALLAG, MARY ANGELI SERRENG
816 MARANCA, VON PAULO ABRIS
817 MARAVILLA, JOHN RON CALOPEZ
818 MARCAIDA, MANCHIE SURIGAO
819 MARCELO, ADEMAR CORPUZ
820 MARCELO, MARK ANTHONY VINTA
821 MARILAG, ELENA AILEEN BROQUEZA
822 MARMETO, RANVILLE DE GRACIA
823 MARQUEZ, AGNES MAE
824 MARQUEZ, JENNIBETH PARRONE
825 MARQUEZ, LEANDRO SOLIS
826 MARQUEZ, MENCHIE SANCHEZ
827 MARQUEZ, MIAMI CORAZON FRIAS
828 MARTIN, APRIL KRISTINE SUPINA
829 MARTINEZ, ARDEE ALVAREZ
830 MARZAN, ROBERTO JR LAURIO
831 MARZO, EDUARD CORPUZ
832 MASTURA, DATUMANDA QUEZON
833 MASTURA, SITTIE AISAH EDZA
834 MATIAS, PRINCESS AVIGALE TEMPORAS
835 MATORRES, CHARISSA DALIDA
836 MATUGUINAS, ROSEL LAPINAS
837 MATURGO, RUBEN JR MONTERO
838 MAYOR, LEEANNE LIM
839 MAÑAGO, MAE KAREEN BAHILLO
840 MEDINA, ADRIAN CARLO MIPALAR
841 MEGIA, JULIUS TIMI GATCHALIAN
842 MEJIA, JENNIFER ROGUEL
843 MEJIA, VICTOR JULIUS VIDAL
844 MEJOGUE, ANNIE PURA
845 MELECIO, SYMUND JOEL ASUNCION
846 MELU, EDDIE ESTEBAN
847 MEMBREVE, MARIA AIZA VILLA
848 MENDIETA, JAYAR VALLOYAS
849 MENDOZA, CHARLOTTE PIA
850 MENDOZA, JAN MICHAEL VIOLA
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 19 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
851 MENDOZA, JAN MICHAEL YUZON
852 MENDOZA, JANICE BANDIOLA
853 MENDOZA, LYANNE MARIE CASTAÑEDA
854 MENGULLO, RAYMUND CABANALAN
855 MERAVELES, JOYCE BRYAN DAQUIOAG
856 MERCADO, CHARIS OLILA
857 MERCADO, CLAIRE CAMSON
858 MERGILLA, JAY-R IPORAC
859 MERLUZA, AIRA SASPA
860 MERRO, JAKE HANNS GACITA
861 MESINA, JONIELA TEVES
862 MICIANO, KRISTOBER GLENN LOPE
863 MILAMBILING, JEFFRY NAMBIO
864 MILANO, ARIEL FLORDELIZ
865 MINA, JOHN MARK ARNOLDO GAERLAN
866 MIRANDA, CARLOU MANABAT
867 MIRANDA, JEAN-LESLIE PAGULAYAN
868 MISSION, MARIO HANDUMON
869 MOLINA, JOAN CAPACILLO
870 MOLINA, MARIA THERESA ANTONIO
871 MOLINO, RAYMUND CELIS
872 MONARES, RAMON JR NACARIO
873 MONES, ROSELLE CASIMINA
874 MONTEROLA, OFELIA MANILA
875 MONTERON, MILAN ABORDO
876 MONTIEL, RICHARD NILO
877 MORAL, CHRISTOPHER MAGO
878 MORALA, CAY JADULOS
879 MORALES, JADE PARSALIGAN
880 MORTEL, JENNALYN FONTANILLA
881 MUÑEZ, DJERALD ASIS
882 MUÑOZ, RANDY AQUINO
883 NABLO, ULYSSES AGUILON
884 NACALABAN, LORLIE ELSA GRANDE
885 NACARIO, INAN MARCO GLORIA
886 NACPIL, LALAINE BACANI
887 NADONZA, DENNIS POLIRAN
888 NANO, FLOR ANGELLIE AGONOY
889 NARAG, FRANCISCO JR BASSIG
890 NARAG, NELBY TALLO
891 NARVASA, JIEMBO ROCA
892 NAVALES, LUCILYN MELO
893 NAVARRO, JUSTIN CASTRO
894 NERON, NEAL RELOJ
895 NGAYA-AN, DANIEL DIWAG
896 NICDAO, JASMIN BOGNOT
897 NUEVA ESPAÑA, JOHN VARGAS
898 NUGUID, JERALBINE REMPERAS
899 NULUD, FRANCIS ONGTANGCO
901 OBOD, NEMAR MORALES
902 OBUSAN, RAFAEL II RAVIS
903 OCAMPO, EDWIN JR OLORIS
904 OGAÑA, MARK JOEL CRUZ
905 OJEDA, MA THERESA YAGUEL
906 OLIVEROS, ERWIN VITALICIO
907 OLPINDO, GENER DIRECTO
908 OMALDE, REX QUIOYO
909 OMAÑA, MICHAEL STEPHEN YACAS
910 ONG, ALLAN NELSON CASTILLO
911 ONG, GLADYS RAISA TAN
912 ONG, SUNSHINE ZARAGOZA
913 ONRUBIA, DENNIS ANTONIO MOLINA
914 OPINA, NIEVA ANGELO
915 OPRIASA, WILLIAM MORE
916 ORAA, J FRANCIS ALAIN NAVARRO
917 ORAPA, DODELON DOROY
918 ORCULLO, SHARMAINE GARCIA
919 ORILLA, RAYMOND NAGUTOM
920 ORIÑA, CHRISTOPHER NUEVAESPAÑA
921 ORQUEZA, BENITO MANGI
922 ORTEZA, ADOLFO AYTONA
923 OSMEÑA, JONATHAN NICK CO
924 OTIDA, ARNEL GAHATOR
925 OZOA, JEFFREY CINCO
926 PACUT, SHEENA MAY ORIBIA
927 PADILLA, JANICE TALLER
928 PADILLA, JOSE CARLO PACIA
929 PADILLA, RYAN REGINALDO
930 PADOLINA, JOHN PAUL JORLUCAS
931 PADUA, JULITO JR GELICAME
932 PADUL, DENNIS UBAY
933 PAET, JOHN ROMER GIMENA
934 PAGDAWAN, JERRY TOSTOS
935 PAHIMNAYAN, ALDWIN SALAZAR
936 PAISTE, NANETTE LOPEZ
937 PALMES, LORELEEN GARCIA
938 PALOMAS, NOEL SULDANO
939 PAMINE, JENEVIEVE ALIMPOLO
940 PANDUYOS, LORMA GALLA
941 PANGANIBAN, MARK JED AMADO
942 PANGCOGA, KHAMALODING ARAGASI
943 PANGILINAN, RICHARD BELTRAN
944 PANOD, FRANCIS CRISTOPHER ARIONES
945 PAPA, DARYL JOY GEREMIA
946 PARAGAS, EUGENE RODULFO
947 PARAGAS, SHEILA ANN DE GUZMAN
948 PARALEJAS, IRENE RAMILO
949 PARCE, JANINE GUAZON
950 PAREL, NEPHIL VILLALON
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 21 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
951 PARTOSA, JED MICHAEL OLAGUER
952 PARUNGAO, JEFFRY TRIBIANA
953 PARZAN, JIMMY GALITANE
954 PASCUAL, DAN MARVIN GO HO
955 PASTOR, REGIE DE LEON
956 PATAC, ESMER ALINIABON
957 PATALAY, ALQUIN ESTRELLADO
958 PATINO, PAOLO VICENTE
959 PATRICIO, JANDRICK VILLANUEVA
960 PATUN-OG, DEMOSTHENES JR SELIM
961 PAULO, BREN ATCHILES
962 PAULO, LOYD BETRANCO
963 PAURCO, LEONILO JR MOTA
964 PAVILLAR, HEINRICH ALBAÑEZ
965 PAYNO, JOMER NOTARIO
966 PAYOT, WINSTON SALAZAR
967 PAYUMO, MONICA GAVILAN
968 PEDREGOSA, GERRY SUAREZ
969 PEDRO, JEROME CRUZ
970 PELAYO, MARLON CAISIP
971 PENSOY, MARY JOY BOADO
972 PERALTA, GRACE ANN CAMBRONERO
973 PERALTA, RUSTY EDADES
974 PEREYRA, MARK CARGO
975 PEREZ, JOSEPHINE MAY SUAVERDEZ
976 PEREZ, MARK HANZEL JEBULAN
977 PERFECTO, GREGORIO JR MATEO
978 PEÑALES, RYAN GEE LAGONERO
979 PEÑAREDONDO, TOM GERARD SYLUANCIA
980 PEÑONES, PAMELA GABRILLO
981 PICCIO, JOSEPH III CAMACHO
982 PIGAO, WENDELL MARZO
983 PILLEJERA, SHERWIN LEE
984 PINEDA, MARICON COLUMNA
985 PINZA, JOANNE ESCALDERON
986 PIPICAN, FAROUK PAGLALA
987 PIÑON, MARIA CLARISA SALAZAR
988 PLATERO, MA CHARISMA SALMINAO
989 POLESTICO, JOHNALON LARETA
990 POLIWES, AYE AL-ALGEW
991 PONCE, LYDA CHRISTINE ZUÑIGA
992 PORMIDA, JAYPEE GO
993 POSADAS, ANGELO TAYO
994 PRANILLA, ARNOLD PARNASO
995 PROJELLA, EUNIL RIÑOS
996 PUBLICO, JOAN KRYSTAL TANAEL
997 PULLIDO, MICHAEL BAYANI
998 PUNAY, YOR CERNAN AQUINO
999 PUNZAL, REYLOURD SAGUN
1000 PUSON, DRETCHELL URBODA
1001 QUESEA, EDWIN NANONG
1002 QUEZON, JULIE MAE GARFIN
1003 QUIAMBAO, GIAN RONALD CANLAS
1004 QUIDAYAN, JOHN NEIL SANGAHIN
1005 QUILAO, FERDINAND BARRIENTOS
1006 QUIMSON, EDWIN ARABOS
1007 QUIOCHO, ARNEL PORTUGUESE
1008 QUIOCHO, DANILO JR BALLENA
1009 QUITALIG, JOSEPH TERRIBLE
1010 RABO, PEDRO DIVINA
1011 RACHO, GRACE JOY SITOY
1012 RACIMO, JAN MICHAEL DELA CRUZ
1013 RACINES, DENNIS PALMITOS
1014 RADOC, MARK JEORGE NICOLAS CENTENO
1015 RAGANIT, OSCAR JR TARAYAO
1016 RAGAY, JENALYN MARQUEZ
1017 RAGUINDIN, JOHNDEL BACLIG
1018 RAMBOYONG, ANTHONY EMBESTRO
1019 RAMENTO, RAYAN GALINGANA
1020 RAMILO, ALVIN CALABANO
1021 RAMIREZ, JOSIFLOR NODADO
1022 RAMIREZ, JULIUS CAESAR DUMENDEN
1023 RAMIREZ, KATHERINE ALEA
1024 RAMIREZ, SANDY UBAY
1025 RAMOS, MARY JANE REGATON
1026 RAMOS, MUSTAPHA PACAAMBUNG
1027 RAMOS, RAYMUND RALPH ZALUN
1028 RAMOS, RICHARD LOSITO
1029 RAMOS, SIEGFRED GAVARRA
1030 RAPADAS, JOEY LALUGA
1031 RAQUION, MICHAEL BALLAD
1032 REAL, LEA VILLANUEVA
1033 REANTILLO, ROMIE SIMEON
1034 REBANAL, HOBERTO JR ESCOBAR
1035 REBANAL, SALVE RIOFRIO
1036 REBUTA, REA MAE DYHINGCO
1037 RECODO, ANA BALANAY
1038 RECTO, RALPH JONNEL DE GUZMAN
1039 REDILLA, ALVIN MIRANDA
1040 REGONDOLA, ELZER LITA
1041 RELLEVE, JAYPEE REMONTE
1042 RELOX, REXTER MINGO
1043 REMO, VONN ALEXIS VALEROSO
1044 REMOLLO, KRIZCHELLE GEMENTIZA
1045 RENDON, MARY ROSE GARCIA
1046 RENOS, JEROME GAMBA
1047 REOTUTAR, JOHN LOUIE RAPADA
1048 RESPICIO, ANDRES III PALADA
1049 REYES, ARIANNE PEÑALOZA
1050 REYES, BEVERLY JANE FERNANDEZ
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 23 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
1051 REYES, LEVY ANN CORPUZ
1052 REYES, RENEE PAULETTE MAY DE VERA
1053 REYES, REX BENIAG
1054 REYES, WENSON ORTIZ
1055 REYES, WYRLO SAAVEDRA
1056 RICAFORT, HERAN RICO
1057 RICO, ROBERTO ESPAÑO
1058 RIGOS, EDUMANZANO DONIEGO
1059 RIMAS, BYRON XERXES MARCELO
1060 RINGOR, REY ALMOITE
1061 RIO, FLORITO JR REAL
1062 RIVERA, HERBERT BARAYUGA
1063 RIVERO, PAOLO DELA PAZ
1064 ROA, RUEL JAMES ALDEGUER
1065 ROBLES, JESSIE CARLO TAPEL
1066 ROCAFORT, MARK VILLALUNA
1067 RODEJO, ELMER JR TABALINA
1068 RODRIGO, ANGELA ESTRIBOR
1069 RODRIGUEZ, PETER JHON CARANDANG
1070 ROJAS, ROLAND TORZAR
1071 ROMBAOA, MC ROLLY MENDOZA
1072 ROMERO, JOENATHAN NAVARRA
1073 ROMERO, JUNEL RODRIGUEZ
1074 ROMERO, MARLYN LIBRODO
1075 ROMERO, RICHARD BRITO
1076 RONDARIS, MARK LESTHER CABUGON
1077 ROSAL, RICHARD CORPIN
1078 ROSALES, REY CATINOY
1079 ROSARIO, JUN DUMLAO
1080 ROSAS, JHONALYN DAWA
1081 ROYO, LEVIE JR LEOPOLDO
1082 RUALO, ELEANOR JEAN ANDRES
1083 RUBIO, MARLON DE MESA
1084 RUFINO, JONATHAN BERMAS
1085 SABBUN, KEITH GLENN VILLANUEVA
1086 SABITSANA, SUPREMO VICTOR DOCALLOS
1087 SABORDO, MARX ROY FLORA
1088 SAGALA, TONI RICA DE RUEDA
1089 SAGUN, JEXTER SIBAL
1090 SALANGSANG, APPLE LOPEZ
1091 SALAPONG, RENEE LEE CONSTANTINO
1092 SALAZAR, ERIC JOHN REYES
1093 SALCEDO, ERROL POTATO
1094 SALCEDO, JOAR AZORES
1095 SALDIVAR, MICHAEL AGAPITO
1096 SALERA, FAIR ROJO
1097 SALES, INDIRAH MARIE RAGASA
1098 SALES, PAULO AGUILAR
1099 SALI, AL-CAUSI LANTAKA
1100 SALIWATO, ALINAIM MAMACOL
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 24 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
1101 SALUDARES, KATHLEEN MEYETTE MAPUTOL
1102 SALUT, EDGAR JAY MILAN
1103 SALVA, MICHAEL PAROL
1104 SALVACION, MARYJO TOGORES
1105 SALVADOR, KENNETH LOZANO
1106 SALVAN, CHERYL PANGANIBAN
1107 SALVIEJO, RHODA LYN DUMRIGUE
1108 SAMANODI, FAHMI AKMAD
1109 SAMPAYAN, WINMARK JORICHELE LIMET
1110 SAMUEL, MICHELLE ASUTILLO
1111 SAN ANDRES, NERA SALANDANAN
1112 SAN FELIX, HARLEY GALONO
1113 SAN JUAN, JEFPREY PAMITTAN
1114 SANCHA, RANILLO JR ALFON
1115 SANCHEZ, DENTROY MANANGAN
1116 SANCHEZ, JIMILOR MOLLENO
1117 SANDAJAN, ELVIN MANZANERO
1118 SANDIGAN, DEBORAH GAY DE LEON
1119 SANDOVAL, AIMEE SILANG
1120 SANGALANG, KHERWIN-J BAGUIO
1121 SANGCAAN, ESTHER PEY-AG
1122 SANGUILA, HAROUN AL-JALANI PESTOLANTE
1123 SANTIAGO, JOSE MARI KRIS ZAPATERO
1124 SANTIAGO, MICHAEL CALONZO
1125 SANTIAGO, TRISTAN JAMES BAMBALAN
1126 SANTOS, AIZA GAVINO
1127 SANTOS, JAY RYAN RIVERA
1128 SANTOS, JOCELYN MALIG
1129 SANTOS, JUAN BERNARDO DE LEON
1130 SANTUYO, MELODY AQUIATAN
1131 SAPORNA, JEMMAR SOTTO
1132 SAPUNGAN, LAURENCE PALOMARES
1133 SARDA, HARVEY SINTOS
1134 SARDOMA, DINAH VILLALON
1135 SARIP, JAFAR LALUNA
1136 SARMIENTO, DARRELLE MEDL CRUZ
1137 SARMIENTO, JOSIE AGUILAR
1138 SARMIENTO, LOUIE ARCILLA
1139 SARROSA, KIM LIMBAGA
1140 SATURNINO, MARK JOSEPH ISLA
1141 SAULONG, HERMES JR TADIA
1142 SAUQUILLO, SHARA DE GUZMAN
1143 SAW, KATHRYN CAROL ARDENASO
1144 SAWEY, REDENTOR NAHAUL
1145 SEBUA, ARC RAY NADELA
1146 SECO, KRYSTAL JANE ORONOS
1147 SEDURIFA, REY HESSON NACUA
1148 SEGURA, JOHN FRITZCHEL OLMEDO
1149 SENSIS, MELCHOR JAMERO
1150 SEPRADO, JERICO SANTIAGO
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 25 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
1151 SERAFINA, FRANCIS DERLAN BLAZO
1152 SEREVILLA, MAE JOY PADILLA
1153 SERONDO, NEWTON FERRANDO
1154 SERRANO, NORBELITO JAVIER
1155 SERRANO, RECTO III BACANI
1156 SESICAN, YURIY JOSE BERMEJO
1157 SEÑASE, ERROL LUCENDA
1158 SEÑOLAY, MICHAEL JOHN SUSTIGUER
1159 SHIONG SHU, CLEO LASQUITE
1160 SIA, ABNER LOU ESPINAS
1161 SIBONGA, HAYZON JOHN SALES
1162 SIBUG, MARIEL SILVANO
1163 SICAT, LEINDJIEL ESTEBAN
1164 SIERRA, CYNDEE DURANTE
1165 SILLA, LEONIE RUBINO
1166 SIMON, SEAN PHILIP ZABALA
1167 SING, JONA YABO
1168 SISON, RON JASON TUTAAN
1169 SITJAR, ROMIELOU NERVIOL
1170 SOBREPEÑA, AIZA LOZANO
1171 SOLANO, ROMMEL BUFI
1172 SOLEYBAR, RUBEN JR MAGDARAOG
1173 SOLIMAN, MAYSON CULALA
1174 SOLITO, FREDERICK SERDEÑA
1175 SONSONA, ANALIE TAN
1176 SOTTO, JUNDALE PAGLINAWAN
1177 SOTTO, ROBIN CANLAS
1178 SOURIBIO, CAROLINE LANCIOLA
1179 STA ANA, JARRIZ PENDRE
1180 STA ANA, LIBERATO RIVERA
1181 STA INES, HENRY JR CUSTODIO
1182 SUAREZ, ANTHONY MARTIN DONALDO
1183 SUBANG, KRYZEL APDIAN
1184 SUBINGSUBING, JERSON RABUTIN
1185 SUDARIA, JOLLY ARANDA
1186 SUMARIA, EDGARDO JR MONTEPIO
1187 SUN, AILEEN MAY FUTALAN
1188 SUNGGOD, KHALID FERRER
1189 SUSA, ANDY TABULINAR
1190 SUSON, LOWILYN PALMARES
1191 SY, KRISTOFER BRYAN AREVALO
1192 SY, MARIA SIMEULLE MANAYA
1193 SYIACO, BON KIMBER TEE
1194 TABAO, ABDULNASSER ALONTO
1195 TABAO-ICAN, LEVI HOPE COCOY
1196 TABARANZA, DINAH FE BURCA
1197 TABRILLA, AILA PARAGAS
1198 TABUGAN, FERDINAND IBARRA
1199 TABUZO, SAMUEL II SAN ANDRES
1200 TADAL, ARIEL REDONDO
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 26 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
1201 TAGARINO, KASHMIR ZAPATA
1202 TAGAVILLA, CATALINA KLARISSA MAE PERALTA
1203 TAGORIO, MICHAEL RAMOS
1204 TAGUINOD, PEDRO JR SABBAN
1205 TAKINAN, JENNIFER BINWAG
1206 TALLO, ERIN GAY OLARTE
1207 TALLUD, LEO JR TAGUINOD
1208 TAMARAY, MANUEL CASIBANG
1209 TAMAYO, GLENN GIL DAVID
1210 TAMESIS, JERWIN HAROLD SANDOVAL
1211 TAMMA, JOHNYSON NIÑO
1212 TAMSI, HARRIS ROMERO
1213 TAN, JASPER YU
1214 TAN, MICHAEL STEPHANIE DONATO
1215 TANAEL, JULIUS ROGEN NAZ
1216 TANIAJURA, MARK UWE URBANO
1217 TAPALLA, ANDREA MAE RACQUEL METUCUA
1218 TAPALLA, ARTHUR JR VILLUDREZ
1219 TAPAR, ARIEL VILLAREY
1220 TAPAS, GENIEWHIN BAGADIONG
1221 TAPIADOR, JENESIS MANDAL
1222 TAPOC, MARK IVANIEL CABASA
1223 TARREGA, CHITO TAÑADA
1224 TARUN, RICHARD PAGULAYAN
1225 TATOY, GENIE SUSON
1226 TEJEDO, JUNDEE MAR BONAGUA
1227 TEJONES, EMILLE ACE DUMLAO
1228 TEMBLADOR, JEFFERSON ALOJADO
1229 TEMPLO, JOEL JR ROJAS
1230 TEOPE, JULIE ANDREA BUBAN
1231 TERCENIO, ARNOLD JOVEN
1232 TERESA, ROBBY VILLAMAYOR
1233 TERRAGO, JOCELYN TRESVALLES
1234 TEVES, JEREMY REA DIZON
1235 TIBON, MIKHAIL JOSEPH VELMONTE
1236 TIDOR, RITZGOLD LUNA
1237 TINGCAWA, WELMER CADAGO
1238 TINIO, RIENA LYN DOLOR
1239 TOLENTINO, LOVELLE KRISTINE DAVID
1240 TOLENTINO, OSMUNDO DUMLAO
1241 TOLENTINO, RYAN VOLTAIRE GENITA
1242 TOLOSA, WILLIAM MICHAEL HIZON
1243 TOMANENG, DENNIS ILAR
1244 TOMAS, ERNESTO JR GARABILLO
1245 TOMINO, JAYSON TAMBIK
1246 TONIDO, ETHEL DE SAN MIGUEL
1247 TORDIL, FREDERICK ARNEJO
1248 TORREGOZA, RAYMOND RODRIGUEZ
1249 TORRES, MA BERNA HERVIAS
1250 TRIA, ROMMEL BETANSOS
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 27 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
1251 TRIPOLCA, JOCELYN ANDIS
1252 TUAZON, EDMUND MADRID
1253 TUBALLAS, RAFAEL ESTERNON
1254 TUBANG, SHELLA MIE SOLANO
1255 TUGBO, RICHARD CANTORIA
1256 TUMANENG, ROWELL ABAYA
1257 TUPLANO, IVY LYNDELL PANTI
1258 TURIN, AUGUSTUS ABRIL URNIETA
1259 TUSCANO, GLENN CARGANILLA
1260 UBEDA, RICA JOY MASONGSONG
1261 UGOKAN, NUR HAMEN BASAG
1262 ULTRA, ZYRA DELA CRUZ
1263 UMPA, JAHARA JOVEN
1264 UNIDAD, JEAN ROSS INAMAC
1265 UNTALAN, SHERYL MARIE JUNIO
1266 UNTALAN, WEYNARD JOSEPH PEREZ
1267 URBANO, ELIZABETH BUNGUBUNG
1268 USMAN, ABDULKHALID DIMACALING
1269 UY, ANNE LORRAINE CORONACION
1270 UY, JASON PRESENTE
1271 UY, RAYMUND POGARO
1272 UY, RITZY GALBAN
1273 UY, WILLIAM ANTHONY SIA
1274 VAILOCES, DIOSDADO JR BALAIS
1275 VALDEZ, APRIL ALIADO
1276 VALDEZ, EUGENE BARROGA
1277 VALDEZ, GINALYN ESTABILLO
1278 VALDEZ, JOSUE LOMBOY
1279 VALDEZ, MILLION TALATTU
1280 VALDEZ, ROGELIO JR RAL
1281 VALENZUELA, AUBREY BIANZON
1282 VALERIANO, JENNIFER MATEO
1283 VALERIO, MARGIE SIAPNO
1284 VALERIO, MONIER DARADAR
1285 VALIN, GRETCHEN JOY UMALI
1286 VALITE, RON MICHAEL BARUT
1287 VARGAS, BERNARD MONDIA
1288 VASOL, JEFFREY BOZAR
1289 VASQUEZ, RAMON MIGUEL
1290 VECIANA, SALVADOR JR LAGRAN
1291 VECINO, ALMEL CUNTAPAY
1292 VELASCO, ELMER PAGUILIGAN
1293 VELASCO, MERVIN
1294 VELASQUEZ, DERICK PAET
1295 VERANGA, SIEGFRED JAY VERASTIGUE
1296 VERDAN, RUIZ AGUBA
1297 VICENCIO, RUBY ANN SEBASTIAN
1298 VICENIO, ROELITO PABLO
1299 VICTORINO, FRANCIS ALEMANIA
1300 VIDAD, JOHN FREDERICK IBAY
Roll of Successful Examinees in the
CIVIL ENGINEER LICENSURE EXAMINATION
Held in JANUARY 2008 Page: 28 of 28
Released on JANUARY 16, 2008
Seq. No. N a m e
1301 VILLA, ALGIE BALBON
1302 VILLACARILLO, JULIUS BENITEZ
1303 VILLACERAN, VANESSA VALDERAS
1304 VILLAFLOR, JOEL BRIZ
1305 VILLAFLORES, JEE-ZALD ALCOVER
1306 VILLAMIL, WILFREDO JR CANETE
1307 VILLANUEVA, JOAN CRISTOBAL
1308 VILLANUEVA, JOSEPH VICTOLERO
1309 VILLANUEVA, RICHARD ALLEN MANGULABNAN
1310 VILLANUEVA, SHERYL ROSE CUEVAS
1311 VILLANUEVA, VIRGINIA OCULAR
1312 VILLAPANDO, ABIGAIL NEBRES
1313 VILLASEÑOR, JING VILLAR
1314 VILLATE, MANUEL LOUIE DEVEZA
1315 VILLEGAS, KATHERINE MAE DELOS REYES
1316 VILORIA, MENARD MARQUEZ
1317 VINCULADO, MICHAEL JOSEPH SALVADOR
1318 VINLUAN, ADONIS DELA CRUZ
1319 VINOYA, CHARLESTHON PIDUCA
1320 VIRAY, MARK ROLDAN ROBLES
1321 VITAL, JOSE ROY TORGA
1322 VITUG, ALDEN SIBUG
1323 VIVO, MARVIN ROY DELMINQUEZ
1324 WAHAB, ABDULWALI LIMUG
1325 WAMINAL, ROLAND JOSEPH SALVADOR
1326 WANAWAN, LOUIE REX ISLAO
1327 WANDAG, WALTER BALACANG
1328 WANYA, DARWIN ULEP
1329 YALONG, KRISTOFFER JAKE TAMAYO
1330 YANGGAT, MARK WILLIAM PARMEROLA
1331 YAP, GILBERT ACOSTA
1332 YAP, ROMHEL ALGABA
1333 YPARRAGUIRRE, BONIFACIO JR ANINO
1334 YUMANG, JENER LAO-ING
1335 YUNTING, RODEL JAPAY
1336 ZABALA, BENJAMIN JR SOLTES
1337 ZAMORA, JOCAS APRIL DEL ROSARIO
1338 ZAPATA, JAMES BENJAMIN BAUTISTA
1339 ZAÑO, DESIREE JOY OCAMPO
1340 ZOLETA, JEANELLEN MARAMOT
1341 ZUÑIGA, ANNA VERONICA OLIVA
1342 ZUÑIGA, JARAMIE SARMIENTO
NOTHING FOLLOWS----------------------
Manila, Philippines
JANUARY 16, 2008
RECOMMENDING APPROVAL:
ANGEL L. LAZARO III
Chairman
Board of Civil Engineering
APPROVED:
LEONOR TRIPON-ROSERO
Chairperson
About Us
The philippineboardexamresults.blogspot.com is a public service website dedicated to Filipinos. Our main goal is to provide fast, reliable and accurate licensure examination results in all fields and courses from the Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) such as the NLE (Nursing Board Exam) and LET (Teacher's Board Exam) results. The results of the Philippine Bar Exams from the Supreme Court are also covered here, and the Civil Service Commission (CSC) exam results that can be found here.
Feel free to comment and let us know your thoughts or suggestions.
-Administrator
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
480 comments:
«Oldest ‹Older 201 – 400 of 480 Newer› Newest»not of all those who took the exam can afford to spend again, panu na mga taga province na malau, na kelangan pa umutang para mkapag exam, pano na!
Wala ako sa posisyon na sumagot kung kumalat yun dahil hindi ko alam. Dapat tanungin sila kung saan galing ang leakage na yun at kung sino ang mga nakinabang. But technicality speaking, sila lang ang nahulihan.
pinoy talaga korap, anumalya puro negatib na, mataas lang kau ganyan na ugali nyo,
ganun naman palka ehhhhh... so di ka rin sure na dalawa lang ang nakinabang sa leakage.... therefore alam mo na kung bakit kailangan na mag re take lahat....
to prc:
kayo ang gumawa ng paraan para mawala ang tiwala ng buong sambayanan sa inyo!!!bulok talaga ang sistema ng pilipinas kaya nga maraming ng understimate sa ating bansa tulad nalng ng kontroversal na line n teri hatcher!!!hindi ba kaya nga tayo tinawag na highest animal dahil ang tao may kakayhan na mag accelerate sa kahit anong larangan,hindi nman kataka taka kung makakuha ng malaking grades!!!ang rame talagang corrupt sa gobyerno!!!unfair kayo!!!!unreasonable kayo!!!
daniel....
ganun naman pala ehhhhh... so di ka rin sure na dalawa lang ang nakinabang sa leakage.... therefore alam mo na kung bakit kailangan na mag re take lahat....
November 28, 2007 3:08 PM
to REE2001,
alam mo dpat cguro tingnan mo muna ang srili mo b4 mo sbhing myabang ang iba.. sa tingin mo ba mgi2ng ganyan ung mga reaksyon nila(ce batch 2007) kung wla nmn reason?... tska sa tingin ko nsa maling bkuran ka... hnd ka nmn civil eh... and u dont have 2 comment kc hnd ka nmn concerned sa bgay na i2 eh... imbes n mpgaan mo ung loob ng batch 2007 eh prang lalo mo lng clang inaasar...
to ce batch 2007,
sa tingin ko wla n kyong mggwa kundi ang mgretake... aral nlng ulit kyo ng mbuti at ipakita nyo s prc n tlgang mgling ung batch nyo... tingnan lng ntin kung hnd cla mphiya... (mlmang eh hi2rapan nila ung exam sa jan 2 kya review kyo mbuti)... bsta try 2 do ur best nlng po...
to PRC,
hnd nmn kya may leak?... panong ssbhin nyong retake kung nhuli nyo nmn ung 2 bcheaters... di ba kya nga may guidelines b4 d exam... problema nyo kc 2 kc ung ibang proctor nyo eh mga byran.. hnd gingwa kung ano ung responsibility nila... pasensya n po dun sa ibang ginwa ung part nila ha... prc nmn, hnd ba kyo ntuto sa ngyari nung sa nursing board exam... hnd kya dpat ng blshin kyo jan sa mga pwes2 nyo... prang hnd nmn ninyo kyang gampanan ung mga trabaho nyo eh...
to 2 cheaters,
ang problema nyo eh ngpahuli kyo... ngaun, hnd ba kyo nko2nsensya dhil sa ginwa nyo eh lhat ng ng-exam eh ndmay... xempre ung ibang proctor tska mismong ang prc... sa tingin ko nmn wla n kyong mga konsensya eh... hnd dpat for professionals ung exam nyo kc sa ugali plng prang hnd n kyo mga professional... sna may m22han kyo sa insedenteng i2...
God bless nlng sa lhat..
sna nmn eh i2 n ung last case ng cheating sa prc/board exam.....
CE BATCH 2005
Bakit madami pa rin nahirapan sa Design tulad ko? After ng exam ng Design, wala akong narinig kundi "ang hirap". Dapat tignan ng PRC ang results ng Design. Kung "unusually high" ang result sa mahirap na exam, then, retake.
guys, cnu po naka-attend sa meeting kanina sa R.I.? pede po malaman ang mga napag-usapan para makasama naman kami on the next move.. dito kasi kami probinsiya.. tnx po.
guys, cnu po naka-attend sa meeting kanina sa R.I.? pede po malaman ang mga napag-usapan para makasama naman kami on the next move.. dito kasi kami probinsiya.. tnx po.
cguro yan c ce for life ai isa reng corrupt na tao kung kayat ganyan xa kung magsalita dpa dapat paiiralin mo ang tama!!hindi nman makatarungan na mag rtake cla ng dahil lng na mataas ang scores nla sa dalawang subject!!dba kailangan nlang ibigay talaga ang valid reason and also d strong ebdenxa kung bakit ganun ang dcsyon!!my butas kasi ang kanilang rason kung kayat marami ang kontra!!!!
daniel ganun talaga pa humble...
cguro kulang cla sa bayad kung kayat retake!!sabi ng uncle ko nuon electrical engineer xa may bayaran daw,kung magbayad ka pasado ka basta malki ang halaga!
Let's just leave it to PICE and PRC. Ang sa akin lang, hindi tama ang dahilan ng PRC sa retake. Six months of review culminates a retake? Madami talaga magagalit nyan.
hai nga naman...!
kung leakage talaga ang problema...
ang tunay na dahilan nyan...
PERA..!
PERA..!
PERA..!
yan lang...!
kasi wala namang maglalabas ng leakage ng walang PERAng katapat e...
MGA MUKHANG PERA..!
isa pa yang sabi ng PRC na mataas ang scores ng mga ngtake...
ito ilagay nyo sa napakaliit nyo na kukuti... kung kakasya pa...
(sana may lugar pa...)
anong akala nyo sa mga ngtake ng exam?
HINDI NAGREVIEW?
palibhasa ayaw nyong mag-isip...
gamitin niyo naman 'yang utak n'yo...
'wag 'yong puro kopya na lang kayo ng kopya ng problems, tapos mgrereklamo kasi matataas nakuha ng mga ngtake...
ano pala gusto n'yo?
umupo na lang at tumanggap ng PERA buwan-buwan?
kung 'yan ang gusto n'yo...
e di, 'wag na kayo gumawa ng EXAM... wala na lang din exam...
babayaran na lang kayo ng sweldo nyo....
saan ba mga kaluluwa n'yo?
nakasangla na o nabili na?
engineer na naiinis...
tama ka kasi mag papasko na kaya pera ang punot dulo nyan...
Mga dudes, let's not speculate. Let's just pray na sana maging just ang desisyon. May meeting ang PICE ngayon. Malalaman din siguro natin ang details.
DONT TALK TO MUCH GUYS..BKA MAMYA LALONG MAGING WORST TO PAG PINALAKI UNG ISSUE..BKA MAGAYA TAU SA MGA MANGYARI SA NGA NURSING..BKA MABAND DIN TAYO SA IBANG BANSA..KAYA HAYAAN NLNG NATIN ANG MGA NAKAKATAAS NA UMAPELA SA PRC...JUST KEEP ON PRAYING....FROM 20_LEC
sa mga taga ce. of university of pangasinan.. galingan nyu sa jan 12..... go go go go....dexter dami umaasa sau......
To CE batch 2007
I'm with ur agonies guys, Im an Electronics Engr. but I have also a CE cusin who is a graduating next yr.
Ipaglaban nyo ang rights nyo,..
elow, wala bang tiga expertz dito? wala ba kayong balita if may meeting din tayo?
text mu si sir cereno....
tsk tsk tsk,
respect? naku paikot ikot... anyways, hindi ako tinatablan,,
sa mga abangerz dito, o sa civil engineering result site, the long wait has ended,, ang inaabangan e next year pa makikita (?)
i almost forgot,, this codename was used to be part of a whole-hearted talk with somehow i called friends, well,i doubt if nabasa mo talaga mga nasulat ko pa before,,
to anonymous:
tnx anyways,,
to anonymous:
nagapologized na ako dun sa mga words nagamit ko. Unang una di ko naman nilalahat ng CE napansin ko lang na madaming nayayabang sa site na ito while waiting the result which is wrong. CE rin ang sister ko kaya alam ko ang nararamdaman ninyo ngayon. Gawin na lang ninyo mgstart na kayong magreview para whatever happen ready na kayo. damage has been done. Habang inaantay ninyo ang resulta ng protest ninyo ready narin kayo sa exam. at malamang pahihirapan kayo. Iwasan rin ninyo ang pagmumura sa Taga-PRC di natin alam baka binabasa nila ito lalo nila kayong pag initan. Di naman nakakatulong ang pagbabangayan natin dito. God Bless uli. Good Luck uli sa Exam ninyo.
merry xmas
u still have lot of time to make it to tht top,,, ce go
hopefully before the day ends... someone had set an action regarding this matter..
It's not just being against to the PRC personnels and officials but we are just fighting for your RIGHTS!
Parang criminal lang po yan THE TRUTH WILL SET YOU FREE!
but with the kind of system we have here in the Philippines NAWAWALAN NA NG SAYSAY ANG TAMA NA IPINAGLALABAN
malamang pag mataas na naman tayo sa retake maghahanap na naman butas prc!
stupid prc!
PRC orders retake of parts of civil-engineering exam
THE Professional Regulation Commission has ordered a retake in the subjects Hydraulics and Geotechnical Engineering and Structural Engineering and Construction in the November 17 and 18, 2007, civil engineer licensure examination given by the Board of Civil Engineering.
The commission nullified examination results in the two subjects after it discovered “irregularities” in the results. A total of 4,782 examinees took the licensure examination in eight test centers nationwide—Manila, Baguio, Cagayan de Oro, Cebu, Davao, Iloilo, Legazpi and Tacloban.
The commission, in a statement, said the examination results in Hydraulics and Geotechnical Engineering were “statistically improbable,” pointing to the “unusually” high grades obtained by the examinees. In Structural Engineering and Construction, the commission added, two examinees were caught in possession of mobile phones, which were confiscated by an agent of the National Bureau of Investigation (NBI). The mobile phones were later turned over to the commission. It said it had discovered that one of the mobile phones contained answers to 30 examination questions wherein 21 answers were found to be correct.
The commission reported the irregularities and its decision to order a retake after nullifying the results in the two subjects to Secretary Arturo Brion of the Department of Labor and Employment. The statement said Brion “lauded [its] swift and decisive action.”
The commission referred the matter to the NBI, suggesting that the bureau conduct an investigation, including the identification of the people behind the irregularities.
To afford the examinees the earliest possible opportunity to retake the examination in the two subjects without need for further review class, the commission said it will administer the test on January 12, 2008, without need to pay the examination fee. The commission added that the examinees shall no longer take the subject Mathematics, Surveying and Transportation Engineering.
Examination details on the new school where the test will be conducted and room assignment will be posted at the commission’s central and regional offices and on its website.
The examinees are required to present their notice of admission, which they used in the November 17 and 18, 2007, examination, on the day of the retake.
Last year, the Professional Regulatory Commission also discovered irregularities in the licensure examination for nurses. Examinees retook parts of the test early this year.
--The Manila Times --
LEAKAGE IS ALWAYS CHEATING, BUT CHEATING IS NEVER A LEAKAGE!!!! theres a thin red line that separates both yet very visible to the eye!!!!
middle finger pra s mga wlang kwentang ngcheat...kita nyo
na wat gnwa nu nsali mga tapat
at ngsakripisyo pra s exam
prc...ayusin nyo trbaho nu..anak kau ng !!!!!!!!! damn it....
sa lhat ng mga tapat at mga ngsumikap...ramdam ko ang hinaing nu gudluck nlng sa jan. 12..ksali kau s prayers ko...
middle finger pra s mga wlang kwentang ngcheat...kita nyo
na wat gnwa nu nsali mga tapat
at ngsakripisyo pra s exam
prc...ayusin nyo trbaho nu..anak kau ng !!!!!!!!! damn it....
sa lhat ng mga tapat at mga ngsumikap...ramdam ko ang hinaing nu gudluck nlng sa jan. 12..ksali kau s prayers ko...
Sa mga R.I na pumunta sa meeting kanina pede makibalita naman nsa provincya kase ako ano po pinagusapan nyo??? pls
tanong ko lng...
kung wala kayang nahuling nangongodigo, would PRC still require u CE grads na magretake pa rin kung tlagang mataas ung scores nyo? kc kung titingnan, isolated case nga ung sa dalawang cheaters, and if PRC will base their decision sa high results nyo, dpat pala ung mga ku2ha ng exam sa future eh wag masyado galingan, kahit madali ung exam.... tsk..di ako CE, kya lng i feel pity naman dun sa mga nag effort at naging honest...
hey i took d board last nov, ganun din gnawa kaso d nahuli ung mga nag rev d2 na taga visayas e cp din nun kaso sa kanila may talagang magaling na magtake sa cebu tapos madali matapos nila exam n den ttxt nila lahat kakilala, i tink may rev cnter din nun na involve eh, baka ganun dn gnawa, almost nawalan dn kami pag asa na pumasa nun kac pnakita ung txt na mga sagot
To ce1988:
to corned beef
i think you will gonna pass retake b.exam..... gudluck saiyo... sainyong lahat...
ce1988
This may be very late but I thank you for the moral support.
--------------
Guys, i-try natin ang lahat ng magagawa natin para ma-prove ang katwiran natin. Pero sabayan natin ng aral, ha? Masakit mang isipin pero sarado ang tainga ng karamihan sa mga ahensyang ito.
At ang Pasko. Malapit na. Wag nating hayaang sila lang ang sisira ng Pasko natin.
PS: Di ko na nabasa yung iba pang message. Pagod na e. Ingat na lang ang goodluck sa ating adhikain.
PS2 (hahaha): Cool lang. Do not forget to be civilized. Mahirap pero... hehe...
PS3 .....: wala lang. Gusto ko lang nito. PS3.
to all CE board takers:
all are requested to come to RI tomorrow nov.29, 2007, 10AM.. we'll be interviewed by nina corpuz of TV patrol. everybody should come to show their supports..
kahit yung tago ibang review please come..
guys gus2 ko lng makita nyo at mabasa i2ng post ng isang concern citizen..
Ako yung nagsulat nung comment na ito sa kabila. pasensya na po sa haba pero you'll find this one "enlightening" maraming salamat po.
Sa aking mga kasamang CE,
Ang pinalabas ng PRC na advisory ay isang insulto, at isang malaking panloloko upang mapagtakpan lamang ang kanilang kamalian. Bakit ko nasabi? Nais ko sanang ipaliwanang.
Unang una ang statement na "Sobrang taas ng score sa Hydro at Design"
Kung ating iisipin, iniinsulto ang kakayahan natin ng pagsagot ng mga problema sa board exam ng statement na ito... bakit?
Kailan pa naging mali ang magkaroon ng madaming mataas na score? Kung ganoon ba dapat ba na walang makasagot ng exam nila para masabing "VALID" ito? Kung ganoon pala, ano pa ang silbi ng pag-aaral natin kung nakadisenyo din pala ang exam na ito para hindi tayo "MAKAKUHA NG MATAAS NA SCORE".
Kahit saan natin tingnan WALA SA ATIN ANG KAMALIAN DAHIL IBINIGAY NILA ANG EXAM, AT SINAGUTAN NATIN. MADAMING MATAAS ANG SCORE HINDI BA TAMA LANG NA SABIHIN NILANG MAHUSAY ANG KINALABASAN AT HINDI SABIHING "MALAMANG AY MAY DAYAAN"? Anong klaseng pag-iisip o kaisipan yan?
Pangalawa, "Dalawa sa mga nag take ang nahulihan ng cellphone"
Oo isang malaking possibility ito, pero nakasaad sa guidelines ng PRC ay: "KUNG MAY MAHULIHAN NG CELLPHONE AUTOMATIC NA BAGSAK NA SILA AT KAILANMAN AY DI NA MAKAKA TAKE NG EXAM"
Mga kasama, wag tayong magpadala sa emosyon.
Kung makikita nyo ang statement na ito, at aanalisahin, makikita nyong pinapalabas nilang dahil sa dalawang yun ay kailangan nating mag retake? ulitin nyo ang pagbasa sa huling sentence ko... Mali hindi ba? contradicting na sa unang pahayag sa GUIDELINES nila, bukod dito, dalawa yun sa 3000 o mas madami pang nag take ng board exam sa buong Pilipinas, kailan naging FACTOR ang DALAWA sa TATLONG LIBO O MAS MADAMI PA?
Ang tanging ginawa nila dito ay makuha ang emosyon natin at may mapagbalingan ng galit. Magandang strategy, pero CIVIL ENGINEER TAYO, MARUNONG TAYO MAG ANALYZE. Wag tayong magpadala sa emosyon natin, pagaralan ang mga bagay bagay. Mali ang pangalawang statement na ito, bukod pa dito, malaki ang pakiramdam ko na gawa gawa lamang nila ito upang masabi nating "oo kailangan nating mag retake dahil sa dalawang yun..." kita nyo na? ang masasabi ko, HINDI TAYO TANGA PARA MANIWALA.
Uulit ulitin ko, hindi na tayo grade one at HINDI KAILAN MAN NAGING GROUP EFFORT ANG BOARD EXAM, UNG DALAWA LANG ANG NAHULI NILA, WALA SILANG KARAPATAN NA I DEPRIVE ANG MAS NAKAKARAMI SA TAMA LAMANG AT PINAGHIRAPAN NA SA ATIN. HINDI ITO CASE NG KASALANAN NG ISA, KASALANAN NG LAHAT.
Kahit sa korte natin pag usapan ito, siguradong panalo tayo.
Mga kaibigan, at kasamang CE, huwag payagan ito, hindi kailanman natin naging kasalanan ang kamalian ng mga examiners. Kung madali ang binigay na exam, sila ang dapat magsisihan. Hindi dapat ibato sa atin ang kamalian at I MISLEAD ang emosyon natin sa pagsasabi ng kung ano ano pang explination para lamang mag retake tayo.
Wag magpadala sa emosyon at matutuhan ang salitang "READ BETWEEN THE LINES" Engineer tayo, hindi tayo mangmang na tao na sasang ayon lamang sa kung ano ang sabihin sa atin, dahil may kakayahan tayong mag-isip.
Ianalyze nyo ng mabuti ang statement ng PRC na iyan at madami kayong makikitang butas. Ang mga nakita ko ay konti o maliit lamang sa maaring makita ng mas madami. Hanapin natin ang katotohanan at wag payagan ang pang iinsultong ito.
Sana'y ipakalat natin ang sulat na ito sa mga site, blogs o e-mail sa ating mga kapatid na CE para mabuksan din ang kanilang kaisipan sa mga nangyayaring maaring hindi rin nila nauunawaan... Gawin nating isa ang ating galaw upang mas malakas at mas malawak ang ating mga magiging pag kilos.
Maraming salamat sa inyong pagbabasa at patnubayan tayo ng Maykapal.
November 27, 2007 11:21 PM
bastos ng mapua said...
10 days nilang pngisipan yng gimik n may nhuli silang gumamit ng celfone….
Kng may tlgng nhulihan cla ilbas nla kng cno pra mlman n hindi gmik lng….
Tutal lking perwisyo nmn yng ngwa kng cno man yng kulangot n yon kng meron tlga….
O msama s loob nla n mdami mataas s hydro???
November 27, 2007 11:29 PM
To everyone:
I know that everyone have realized or should realized, that our batched have been marked by this scandalous event. it is very hurtful that this is a fact. If this tragedy will continue to spread throughout our future endeavours, our career will definetly be affected. The PRC, should have realized these posibilities; the fault of two is not a factor to generalized more than 4700 examinees to cheat from the exam.
The least that the PRC can do is to admit all their faults, admit that they have falsely given an easy exam for "geotechnical and hydraulics" which results to a high passing percentage which they really do not expect. And secondly admit that they have lots of corrections in the "Structural design and Contruction" subject, and do not used the two cheaters.
Through this, they can ease and at least save our batch from negative effects to our career, especially to everyone who really did there best honestly!!!! this is our life, please PRC show some humility!
"Bender"
To everyone:
I know that everyone have realized or should realized, that our batched have been marked by this scandalous event. it is very hurtful that this is a fact. If this tragedy will continue to spread throughout our future endeavours, our career will definetly be affected. The PRC, should have realized these posibilities; the fault of two is not a factor to generalized more than 4700 examinees to cheat from the exam.
The least that the PRC can do is to admit all their faults, admit that they have falsely given an easy exam for "geotechnical and hydraulics" which results to a high passing percentage which they really do not expect. And secondly admit that they have lots of corrections in the "Structural design and Contruction" subject, and do not used the two cheaters.
Through this, they can ease and at least save our batch from negative effects to our career, especially to everyone who really did their best honestly!!!! this is our life, please PRC show some humility!
"Bender"
Let's assume na may leakage nga sa Structural dahil umano'y may nahuli sila sa Cagayan de Oro. Structural lang dapat may retake dahil wala namang ebidensiya na may leakage sa Hydro/Geo. Mataas ang karamihan sa Hydro/Geo? Ipa-solve nyo kaya sa mga CE students na tapos na ng Hydro/Geo sa college. Most of the questions are merely formula based. Nothing tricky with the questions. So with that, Structural lang dapat i-retake. Leave our scores with Hydro/Geo alone.
I protest, if they will announce a leakage to structural!!! the 2/4700 is definitely an unacceptable factor, and besides, only 21 questions were correct on the said answers aquired from the cellphone, have they not realize that this is might be only a student to student communication who were just simultaneously taking the exam. they already jump into a conclusion which is inappropriate, if they have considered this, they should not or no one should assume that there is really a leakage. if this comes out to the press again and telling that our batch commit a cheating through leakages, our career will totally be doomed.... please everyone, do not comment or accept that there is a leakage... man, this is so hard!!!!
"Bender"
on my part, i already accepted that there will be a retake, as it was announced officially, they might have a point why they did this, which is definitely NOT OUR FAULT, the passers might have exceeded there quota extremely (saying almost 85% passed) because they have mistakenly given an easy exam in hydro and geo which gave a chance to everyone to pull up there scores in math and structural.. the worst thing they have done, is they are blaming and insulting our capacity saying that the scores in hydro and geo were highly improbable!!! that is definitely "nakakayamot"!!! they should admit this is totally their fault!!
"Bender"
this is my first time to comment on this blog. i was just reading all the comments during the waiting hours of our wasted time... what a waste of time..
tumingin tayo sa brighter side, buti na lng 1 month lng ang gnwa nilang pagitan ng retake, at hindi ka2lad ng nursing.. Pray pray pray..
"Bender"
Paalala lang sa lahat ng mga nagtake ng exam, sabayan din ninyo ng review ang paggawa ng action laban sa decision ng PRC... Remember what happened sa case ng Nursing Board Exam, in the end nagretake rin silang lahat.. Mabuti na yung handa rin kayong lahat sa maaaring maging final decision regarding your case.. Alam ko na mahirap ang pinagdadaanan ninyong lahat.. Kami nga na 5 days lang ang pinaghintay for the result of the exam (nov 2005), sobra sobrang kaba at takot at kung ano-ano pang emotions ang naramdaman... Kayo pa na 10 days ang pinaghintay tapos malalaman niyo pa na retake ang exam!!! Basta advice lang, continue on reviewing for the "retake".. If you are really meant to pass the Nov 2007 CE Licensure Exam, you will pass kahit pa magkaron ng retake... Keep on praying guys... GOD BLESS ALL OF YOU
Guys hindi kami makapunta sa interview bukas dahil malayo kasi kami taga Mindanao pa. Ipabasa nyo nalang sa media ang mga comments dito para kahit papaano marinig din ang mga boses na tulad namin na hindi makakarating dyan.
Para din malaman nila kung paano tayo naghintay sa result subalit nauwi lamang sa ganito
atay ba na retake oi!!! saun ra mn jud ang exam kng magstudy wala p jud klaro ang info. nkabutang ba ang name sa 2? mura mn og wala.. kng mao mn gani dapat naa ang name ato aron cla forever dli katake.
although i'm not a CE but i just cant help but wonder why there isn't enough media coverage in this issue is the PRC trying to cover up their mess??? have they already issued a public statement regarding their irresponsible blunder???
I hope this is still a good morning to everyone. I've heard sa radio news na mataas daw ang passing rate kaya may retake. Dahil daw nahatak ng score natin sa Hydro/Geo ang scores natin sa Math at Design. It's not our fault na mataas ang nakuha namin sa Hydro/Geo dahil sinagutan lang namin ang binigay nilang exam. It's PRC's fault dahil hindi nila ni-review ng maigi yung exam na yun. This is an outrage! Ginawa lang nilang escape goat yung mga nahuli nilang may leakage dahil wala naman silang nabanggit na madami ang mataas ang score sa Design. Hindi rin nila nabanggit na may error sa questionaire sa Design. Ang iregularidad ay hindi sa parte ng mga examinees Ito ay sa parte ng PRC!!!
kinahanglan retake jud part...unfair naman sa nursing...
sayop na sa nidawat ug kodigo....f kamao jud mo??ayaw kahadlok bisan kapila pa mo retake....
kinsa man d i ang nakahibalo sa mga questionaire??DBA ang taga board of directors ra???natural rana sa examineer mga maningkamot para naay answer..ug wala pana gibaligya ang mga questions walay leakage manggawas...
tanga ung nagbantay bkit nya hinayaan na mag exam ung may cellphone sa bulsa....tpos ang daming nadamay sa katangahan nya......mga walang silbing watcher...kukuha na nga ng magbabantay ung unprofeesional pa....
Revised IRR of National Building Code – Why is an Injunction Necessary?
Angel L. Lazaro III, Ph.D.
Chairman, Board of Civil Engineering
Professional Regulation Commission
Short History
The National Building Code, Presidential Decree 1096, was approved in the 1970’s
PD 1096 calls for the issuance by the Secretary of the DPWH of Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR)
The current IRR is composed of various DPWH Orders and policies issued through the years
For the past few years, the DPWH has been preparing a consolidated revised IRR
Short History
The DPWH formed a committee composed of various stakeholders who were consulted regarding the Revised IRR
The Committee included representatives from Accredited Professional Organizations, including PICE
The final version of the Revised IRR was prepared by a Committee within the DPWH
Short History
The final version of the Revised IRR was published in the Manila Standard three times (April 1, 8 and 15, 2005)
The Revised IRR would have been implementable on April 30, 2005, 15 days after the third publication
The Revised IRR contains the procedure for the application for and issuance of building permits, among other provisions
Why is an Injunction Necessary?
The Revised IRR will prevent licensed and registered Civil Engineers from practicing Civil Engineering
Therefore, the Revised IRR violates Republic Act No. 544 (The Civil Engineering Law)
Specifically, the Revised IRR violates Sections 2 and 23 of Republic Act 544
How Does the Revised IRR prevent Civil Engineers from Practicing Civil Engineering?
Section 302 of P.D. 1096 and Section 3.2 of Ministry Order 57 (Old IRR) requires the submittal to the Building Official of five (5) sets of plans and specifications prepared, signed and sealed by a duly licensed architect or civil engineer, in case of architectural and structural plans.
Section 302.3 of Revised IRR requires the submittal to the Building Official of five (5) sets of plans, specifications and documents prepared, signed and sealed over the printed name of the duly licensed and registered professionals:
Architect, in case of architectural documents; in case of architectural interior/interior design documents, either an architect or interior designer may sign;
Civil Engineer, in case of civil/structural documents;
What Constitutes Architectural Documents in the Revised IRR (Section 302.4)?
Architectural Plans/Drawings
Vicinity Map/Location Plan
Site Development Plan
Perspective
Floor Plans
Elevations
Sections
Reflected Ceiling Plan
Details, in the form of plans, elevations/sections
Schedule of Doors and Windows
Schedule of Finishes
Details of other major architectural elements
Architectural Interiors/Interior Design
Plans and Specific Locations of Accessibility Facilities
Fire Safety Documents
Other Related Documents
What Constitutes
CivilEngineering/Structural Documentsin the Revised IRR (Section 302.5)?
Site Development Plan
Structural Plans
Structural Analysis and Design
Boring and Load Tests
Seismic Analysis
Other related documents
Revised IRR will Prevent Civil Engineers from Preparing, Signing and Sealing Building Designs, Plans and Specifications
Revised IRR is correct in identifying the documents listed in Section 302.4 of the Revised IRR as “architectural documents”
Revised IRR violates RA 544 in limiting “civil engineering documents” to the documents listed in Section 302.5.
The complete list of “civil engineering documents include the documents listed in both Sections 302.4 and 302.5.
Revised IRR will Prevent Civil Engineers from Preparing, Signing and Sealing Building Designs, Plans and Specifications
Revised IRR will give the exclusive right to Architects to prepare, sign and seal designs, plans and specifications enumerated in Section 302.4 as Architectural Documents
Revised IRR will limit Civil Engineers to preparing, signing and sealing designs, plans and specifications enumerated in Section 302.5 as Civil Engineering/ Structural Documents
Revised IRR will make it impossible to obtain Building Permits for buildings whose designs, plans and specifications are prepared, signed and sealed by Civil Engineers
Understanding RA 544
Sections 2 and 23 of Republic Act No. 544 (The Civil Engineering Law) clearly include the preparation, signing and sealing of designs, plans and specifications of buildings in the scope of practice of Civil Engineering
Section 2 of RA 544 Includes Preparation of Building Designs, Plans and Specifications in Scope of Practice of Civil Engineering
Section 2, RA 544 – “The practice of civil engineering within the meaning and intent of this Act shall embrace services in the form of consultation, design, preparation of plans, specifications, estimates, erection, installation and supervision of construction of streets, bridges, highways, railroads, airports and hangars, portworks, canals, river and shore improvements, lighthouses, and dry docks; buildings, fixed structures for irrigation, flood protection, drainage, water supply and sewerage works, demolition of permanent structures, and tunnels.”
Section 2 of RA 544 Includes Preparation of Building Designs, Plans and Specifications in Scope of Practice of Civil Engineering
Civil Engineering Services
Consultation
Design
Preparation of Plans
Preparation of Specifications
Preparation of Estimates
Erection
Installation
Supervision of Construction
Demolition of Permanent Structures
Section 23 of RA 544 Allows Civil Engineersto Prepare, Sign and Seal BuildingDesigns, Plans and Specifications
Section 23, RA 544 – “It shall be unlawful for any person to order or otherwise cause the construction, reconstruction, or alteration of any building or structure intended for public gathering or assembly such as theaters, cinematographs, stadia, churches or structures of like nature, and any other engineering structures mentioned in section two of this Act unless the designs, plans and specifications of the same have been prepared under the responsible charge of, and signed and sealed by a registered civil engineer, and unless the construction, reconstruction and/or alteration thereof are executed under the responsible charge and direct supervision of a Civil Engineer.”
Revised IRR Confers Position of Prime Professional to Architect
The Revised IRR confers position of Prime Professional in building projects exclusively to Architects
The procedure for application of building permit (see next slide) clearly puts all other professions under the Architect
No Building Permit can be issued without the participation of an Architect
The Revised IRR prevents other
professionals from assuming the role of Prime Professional in building projects
This has no basis in any of the professional laws, including RA 9266
Injunction is Needed
P.D. 1096 provides that Implementing Rules and Regulations shall be formulated by the DPWH Secretary
Then DPWH Secretary Soriquez has signed the revised IRR
P.D. 1096 provides that the IRR shall take effect after their publication once a week for three consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation
IRR has been published in the Manila Standard on April 1, 8 and 15
Without an injunction, the IRR will now be in effect
Overlap Among Professions
Doctors, Midwives, Nurses, Dentists, Nutritionists and Dietitians, Optometrists
Lawyers, Accountants, Criminologists, Customs Brokers
Mechanical Engineers, Electrical Engineers, Electronics and Communications Engineers
Architects, Interior Designers, Landscape Architects
Civil Engineers, Architects, Sanitary Engineers, Geodetic Engineers, Master Plumbers, Agricultural Engineers, Environmental Planners
Many Others
Overlap Among Professions(Some Examples)
The act of delivering a baby could constitute the practice of medicine, midwifery or nursing, depending on which professional carries out the delivery
The act of preparing an opinion on a question of tax law could constitute the practice of law or accounting, depending on which professional is the author of the opinion or document
Overlap Among Professions(Some Examples)
The act of preparing designs, plans and specifications for the interior of a building could constitute the practice of architecture or interior design, depending on which professional prepared the documents
The act of preparing designs, plans and specifications for a building could constitute the practice of architecture or civil engineering, depending on which professional prepared the documents
Revisiting the Revised IRR
Section 302.4 - Architectural Plans/Drawings
Vicinity Map/Location Plan
Site Development Plan
Perspective
Floor Plans
Elevations
Sections
Reflected Ceiling Plan
Details, in the form of plans, elevations/sections
Schedule of Doors and Windows
Schedule of Finishes
Details of other major architectural elements
Architectural Interiors/Interior Design
Plans and Specific Locations of Accessibility Facilities
Fire Safety Documents
Other Related Documents
Revisiting the Revised IRR
Section 302.5 – Civil Engineering Documents
Site Development Plan
Structural Plans
Structural Analysis and Design
Boring and Load Tests
Seismic Analysis
Other related documents
Correct List of Civil Engineering Documents
Section 302.5 – Civil Engineering Documents
Vicinity Map/Location Plan
Building Plans
Perspective
Floor Plans
Elevations
Sections
Reflected Ceiling Plan
Details, in the form of plans, elevations/sections
Schedule of Doors and Windows
Schedule of Finishes
Structural Plans
Site Development Plan
Structural Analysis and Design
Boring and Load Tests
Seismic Analysis
Other related documents
Revised IRR is in Error
Revised IRR is in error by limiting “civil engineering documents” to those enumerated in Section 302.5.
Revised IRR is in error by not including the documents enumerated in Section 302.4 in the list of “civil engineering documents” in Section 302.5.
The documents enumerated in Section 302.4 are not generically “architectural documents”.
The documents enumerated in Section 302.4 are “Architectural Documents” only if prepared, signed and sealed by an Architect
The documents enumerated in Section 302.4 are “Civil Engineering Documents” if they are prepared, signed and sealed by a Civil Engineer
Revised IRR is in Error
Civil Engineers have been preparing, signing and sealing building designs, plans and specifications not only for the past 50 years (life of RA 544) but even before the professions or Architecture and Civil Engineering were regulated
The preparation, signing and sealing of building designs, plans and specifications is part of the practice of Civil Engineering by law, history and tradition
This right of Civil Engineers to prepare, sign and seal building designs, plans and specifications has never been legally challenged, up to the present
There has never been any case filed or legal judgment rendered that this practice of Civil Engineers has had any adverse effect to any person or has been harmful to public welfare
Revised IRR is in Error
The only parties affected by this practice are Architects who are forced to compete with Civil Engineers in the open market
The purpose of regulatory laws is to protect the public and not any particular profession
RA 9266 is irrelevant to this issue which is concerned only with the practice of Civil Engineering
RA 9266 affects only the profession of Architecture and not Civil Engineering (Section 43)
RA 9266 has not repealed RA 544 (Section 47)
RA 9266 has not removed the preparation, signing and sealing of building designs, plans and specifications from the practice of Civil Engineering
Revised IRR is Biasedin Favor of Architects
Revised IRR confers the position of Prime Professional to Architects, without any legal basis
Revised IRR conveniently invokes the Principle of Overlap of Architecture with the profession of Interior Design with regards to preparation, signing and sealing of designs, plans and specifications for building interiors
Revised IRR totally disregards the Principle of Overlap of Architecture with the profession of Civil Engineering with regards to preparation, signing and sealing of designs, plans and specifications for Buildings
Guidelines in Preparing Building Designs, Plans and Specifications by Civil Engineers
While the Old IRR allows Civil Engineers to sign and seal Architectural plans and documents, this is not advisable to avoid possible conflict with RA 9266
Label all plans, specifications and other documents “Civil Engineering” before signing and sealing them (Do not sign and seal any plan or document labeled “Architectural”, or any other profession)
Place the title “Civil Engineer” under your name and signature when signing plans, specifications and other documents (Do not sign in any space that contains the title “Architect”, or any other profession, whether in the plans, documents, application for permit, or the permit itself)
If a Civil Engineer signs a plan labeled “Architectural Plans”, or signs in a space containing the title “Architect”, he could be charged with practicing Architecture and with violating RA 9266.
PICE has obtained Preliminary Injunction from Manila RTC
PICE obtained 72 hour Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) against implementation of Revised IRR first week of May, 2005
PICE obtained 20-day TRO second week of May, 2005
PICE obtained Preliminary Injunction on May 24, 2005
Preliminary Injunction has no expiry date and means that implementation of the Revised IRR is stopped until the issues raised by PICE are resolved
Preliminary Injunction Recognizes Issue Raised by PICE
Dispositive paragraph of Preliminary Injunction states:
“Both the petitioner and respondent are one that one cannot be deprived of the right to work and the right to make a living because these rights are property rights. It is not disputed that prior to the issuance of the questioned IRR, petitioners, as civil engineers, were exercising the subject rights pursuant to R.A. 544 and P.D. 1096 as well as Ministry Order 57 which the subject IRR would now remove from them. It is a legal truism that ‘the spring cannot rise higher than its source’. At this stage of the proceedings, it would appear that the new IRR goes beyond the laws it seeks to implement.”
DPWH Answer to Preliminary Injunction
DPWH, through Solicitor General, submitted their answer on June 17, 2005
Sections 2 and 23 of RA 544 does not state in clear and unequivocal terms that civil engineers can prepare, sign and seal architectural documents
Only under Section 302 of PD 1096 and Section 3.2 of Ministry Order 57 that the right of civil engineers to prepare, sign and seal architectural plans was recognized and expressly granted.
DPWH Answer to Preliminary Injunction
Section 302 of PD 1096 and Section 3.2 of Ministry Order 57 have been repealed by Sections 20, 25 and 29 of RA 9266, the “Architecture Act of 2004”
Assuming arguendo that Sections 2 and 23 of RA 544 include the preparation of architectural documents, said provision has likewise been repealed by RA 9266
DPWH Answer to Preliminary Injunction
RA 9266 was approved on March 17, 2004 while RA 544, PD 1096 and Ministry Order 57 were approved in 1950, 1977 and 1978, respectively.
In case of irreconcilable conflict between two laws, the later enactment must prevail.
That RA 9266 has repealed the other laws is evident from Section 46 of RA 9266.
DPWH Answer to Preliminary Injunction
PD 1096 is a general law as it deals with the practice of various professions, while RA 9266 is a special law because it deals exclusively with the practice of architecture.
It is a finely-imbedded principle that a special provision of law prevails over a general one.
DPWH Answer to Preliminary Injunction
The Revised IRR did not amend nor supplant the laws promulgated by the legislature.
The Revised IRR is consistent and in harmony with the pertinent provisions of RA 9266.
DPWH Answer to Preliminary Injunction
It is erroneous to claim that the Revised IRR is null and void because it gives architects the exclusive right to prepare, sign and seal architectural documents.
It is the legislature by virtue of RA 9266 which gives duly licensed architects the exclusive right to prepare, sign and seal architectural documents.
Understanding RA 9266
Section 20. Seal, Issuance and Use of Seal. – A duly licensed architect shall affix the seal prescribed by the Board bearing the registrant’s name, registration number and the title “Architect” on all architectural plans, drawings, specifications and all other contract documents prepared by or under his/her direct supervision.
Understanding RA 9266
Section 20(2) – No officer or employee of this Republic, chartered cities, provinces and municipalities, now or hereafter charged with the enforcement of laws, ordinances or regulations relating to the construction or alteration of buildings, shall accept or approve any architectural plans or specifications which have not been prepared and submitted in full accord with all the provisions of this Act; nor shall any payments be approved by any officer for any work, the plans and specifications for which have not been so prepared and signed and sealed by the author.
Understanding RA 9266
Section 20(5) – All architectural plans, designs, drawings and architectural documents relative to the construction of a building shall bear the seal and signature only of an architect registered and licensed under this Act together with his/her professional identification number and the date of its expiration.
Understanding RA 9266
Section 25 – “No person shall practice architecture in this country, or engage in preparing architectural plans, specifications or preliminary data for the erection or alteration of any building located within the boundaries of this country, or use the title “Architect”, or display the word “Architect” together with another word, or use any title, sign, card, advertisement, or other devise to indicate such person practices or offers to practice architecture, or is an architect, unless such person shall have received from the Board a Certificate of Registration and be issued a Professional Identification Card.”
Understanding RA 9266
Section 29 – Prohibition in the Practice of Architecture and Penal Clause. – Any person who shall practice or offer to practice architecture in the Philippines without being registered/licensed and who are not holders of temporary or special permits in accordance with the provisions of this Act … shall be guilty of misdemeanor and charged in court by the Commission…
Exclusive to Architects
Practice architecture in the Philippines
Engage in preparing architectural plans, specifications or preliminary data for the erection or alteration of any building located within the boundaries of the Philippines
Use the title “Architect”
Display the word “Architect” together with another word
Display or use any title, sign, card, advertisement, or other device to indicate such person practices or offers to practice architecture, or is an architect
Revisiting PD 1096 and Ministry Order No. 57
Section 302 of P.D. 1096 and Section 3.2 of Ministry Order No. 57 (Old IRR) requires the submittal to the Building Official of five (5) sets of plans and specifications prepared, signed and sealed by a duly licensed architect or civil engineer, in case of architectural and structural plans.
Revisiting Section 2 of RA 544
Section 2, RA 544 – “The practice of civil engineering within the meaning and intent of this Act shall embrace services in the form of consultation, design, preparation of plans, specifications, estimates, erection, installation and supervision of construction of streets, bridges, highways, railroads, airports and hangars, portworks, canals, river and shore improvements, lighthouses, and dry docks; buildings, fixed structures for irrigation, flood protection, drainage, water supply and sewerage works, demolition of permanent structures, and tunnels.”
Revisiting Section 23 of RA 544
Section 23, RA 544 – “It shall be unlawful for any person to order or otherwise cause the construction, reconstruction, or alteration of any building or structure intended for public gathering or assembly such as theaters, cinematographs, stadia, churches or structures of like nature, and any other engineering structures mentioned in section two of this Act unless the designs, plans and specifications of the same have been prepared under the responsible charge of, and signed and sealed by a registered civil engineer, and unless the construction, reconstruction and/or alteration thereof are executed under the responsible charge and direct supervision of a Civil Engineer.”
Why DPWH Answer is Wrong
The DPWH answer presumes that the PICE case is that civil engineers can prepare, sign and seal “architectural plans and documents”.
The PICE case is: Civil Engineers should not be prevented from practicing civil engineering which includes preparing, signing and sealing building plans and documents.
Why DPWH Answer is Wrong
It is immaterial whether PD 1096 and Ministry Order NO. 57 has been repealed by RA 9266 because it is RA 544 (not PD 1096) that gives civil engineers the right to prepare, sign and seal building plans
RA 9266 has not repealed Sections 2 and 23 of RA 544 because these sections are not inconsistent with RA 9266 as they do not state that civil engineers can prepare, sign and seal “architectural plans or documents” (There is nothing to repeal).
Why DPWH Answer is Wrong
Sections 2 and 23 of RA 544 clearly states that the preparation, signing and sealing of “building plans” are within the scope of practice of civil engineering.
Therefore, the PICE case hinges on the proper interpretation of the term “building plans”.
The PICE position is that the term “building plans” include all plans of buildings.
Why DPWH Answer is Wrong
Architects claim that the term “building plans” in RA 544 means “structural building plans”
If this is the case, why is that not what is stated?
If this is the case, why is it that civil engineers have been preparing, signing and sealing complete “building plans” for thousands of years, without any legal challenge?
Why DPWH Answer is Wrong
The DPWH answer is totally dependent on the premise that RA 9266 is relevant to this case.
This will only be true if the case is about the practice of architecture.
The PICE case is not about the practice of architecture but about the practice of civil engineering.
Therefore, RA 9266 is irrelevant, and the applicable law is RA 544.
RA 9266 Cannot Justify the Revised IRR
Section 43, RA 9266 – “This Act shall not be construed to affect or prevent the practice of any other legally recognized profession.”
RA 9266 does not affect the scope of practice of Civil Engineering
Section 46 of RA 9266 - “Republic Act No. 545, as amended by Republic Act No. 1581, is hereby repealed and all other laws, orders and regulations or resolutions or part/s thereof inconsistent with the provisions of this Act are hereby repealed or modified accordingly” does not repeal or modify RA 544 for the following reasons:
No provision of RA 544 is inconsistent with RA 9266, because RA 544 does not authorize civil engineers to prepare, sign and seal architectural plans and documents
DPWH Answer to Preliminary Injunction
DPWH Answer to Preliminary Injunction
Why DPWH Answer is Wrong
The PICE position is that all existing laws must be enforced, including RA 9266, PD 1096 and RA 544.
The DPWH position is correct only if RA 9266 is the applicable law to this case.
If RA 544 is the applicable law, then the revised IRR deprives civil engineers of a right vested upon them by law.
Since the PICE case is about the practice of civil engineering and not the practice of architecture, the relevant law is RA 544.
DPWH Answer to Preliminary Injunction
DPWH answer states that laws are adopted to make sure that the plans specifications and other documents to be submitted for the issuance of a building permit are prepared, signed and sealed by competent professionals who possess the required skills, knowledge and expertise on the matter to safeguard life, health, property and public welfare.
Why DPWH Answer is Wrong
Civil Engineers have prepared, signed and sealed building plans for thousands of years, with distinction
There has never been a legal challenge, much less a decision, questioning this right of civil engineers
There has never been a single case, much less a decision, that civil engineers are a threat to life, health, property or public welfare
It is an insult to the civil engineering profession to question the competence of civil engineers to prepare, sign and seal building plans
It is an insult to the civil engineering profession to accuse civil engineers of being threats to life, health, property or public welfare
Conclusion
Civil Engineers cannot practice architecture
Architects cannot practice civil engineering
When a Civil Engineer prepares, signs and seals building plans, he is practicing Civil Engineering, not Architecture
The only law applicable relevant to Civil Engineers is RA 544.
RA 9266 is irrelevant because it affects only the practice of Architecture, not Civil Engineering
The Revised IRR prevents Civil Engineers from practicing Civil Engineering
pwede bang elabas nila ung result ng math para malaman kung sino ang mga may pag-asang pumasa.
PRC,anu ba kau?napaka-unprofessional naman nang disisyon nyo.hindi naman tama na lahat ang parusahan sa kasalanan 2.dapat ang nagkasala lang ang bigyan ng disiplinary action.
may kasalanan din naman kau PRC eh.kasi hindi masyadong mahigpit ang pagbabantay ng nga watchers nyo.wag nyong iblame sa amin ang resulta ng pagkukulang nyo.iblame nyo sa katangahan nyo.
yong sa hydro talagang madali lang ang exam.napaka unprofessional naman ninu kung gawin nyong dahilan ang score namin para sa retake.my God!!dun lang nga kami parang nabunutan ng tinik ganito pa gagawin nyo?
anu ba kau PRC??ang tanga nyo.
Mga Dudes:
Sna wag nio ng plakihin 2ng isyu n 2
bka dis wil b d coz of baning Civil
Engineers abroad. . .
ayos... iba talagang trumabaho ang PRC...
Look how quiet the PRC is...
wala man lang news update regarding to their announcement last Nov. 27, 2007.
Ano ba akala nyo sa mga Examinees nyo? hangin lang na hindi nyo pinapansin?
Or YOU'RE REALLY PROVING THAT YOUR INSTITUTION DOESN'T CARE ABOUT EXAMINEES
HOW PROFESSIONALS!!!!
TO ALL BLOGGERS:
KINDLY POST THE PRC RULES AND REGULATIONS KUNG MERON MAN KAU...
BAKA KASI NAKALIMUTAN NG PRC OFFICIALS UN MGA RULES NA GINAWA NILA...
REMIND LANG NATIN...
MALAMANG MALAKI NA MEMORY GAP NG MGA YAN!!!
SEATERS....
DI NAMIN PINAPALAKI ANG ISSUE...
SA PRC NAGMULA LAHAT YAN...
SO DON'T BLAME US COZ WE ARE JUST EXPRESSING OUR OPINIONS AND RIGHTS...
KUNG MABAN MAN ANG PILIPINO SA IBANG BANSA IT'S BECOZ OF THOSE VERY VERY INTELLIGENT AND POWERFUL OFFICIALS HERE IN PHILIPPINES...
Asan na ung cnasabing "ANG KABATAAN ANG PAGASA NG BAYAN"?
Paanong magiging pagasa eh ung mga matandang mga officials na yan ang nagpapbagsak s kanila...
MASYADONG MAGAGALING...
first of all hindi bobo ung mga examinees, natural lang na nag aral at nag review kme, dahil dito dapat lamang n makakuha kme ng mataas n score s board exam.. kasalanan b nmin n makakuha ng mataas n score s malinis at patas na paraan? HINDI IBIG SABIHIN N MARAMING NKAPASA E NANDAYA NA! (paki sagot ito PRC!)secondly, walang basis or proof ang PRC n nandaya ang lahat ng examinees.. alam nting lahat ang mga regulations s loob ng exam room.. at mapapatunayan yan ng dalawang proctor kung meron o wlang dayaan ang nangyari.. ang problema mukang walang tiwala ang PRC s mga proctor n sila mismo ang naglagay, aba e wag n silang magpa exam khit kelan.. malinaw n ayaw nilang ipasa ang maraming examinees hindi ko malaman kung anu dahilan nila, DAHIL WALA AKONG MAKITANG VALID REASON PARA IPARETAKE NILA UNG EXAM.. kaya walang nangyayari s bansa natin dahil ang mga namumuno s atin puro mabababaw mag isip.. with regard s hydro i think the examiner did a great job he knows how broad civil enginering course is, kya most of his questions are basic hydroulics and geotechnical questions ung nilagay nya s exam.. unlike s structural mukang pang masteral ung mga questions.. tungkol naman s dalawang nhulihan nila ng cell phone bkit hindi nila icheck kung sino sino ung napasahan ng message mchechek naman nila un s sent items or s phone book kung sino sino ang mga related s dalawang ito.. then macocompare namn nila kung pareho ung mga answers nitong dalawa s ibang examinees.. set A & B ung exam ung text b nila set A&B rin? and lahat b ng examinees kagaya ng sagot nilang dalawa para idamay nila kmeng lahat s pagreretake?! ang babaw nyo talaga PRC.. WE DON'T DESERVE THIS! AYAW NAMING MAG RETAKE, DAHIL PARANG INAMIN N RIN NMIN N NANDAYA KME! MALINIS ANG CONSCIENCE NAMIN.. HINDI KAGAYA NYO!
ANG MALAS NATIN NANDITO TYO S BANSANG BULOK ANG SISTEMA.. S HALIP N UMUNLAD TYO, ETO TYO HINIHILA TYO PABABA NG MGA ALIMANGO..
KUNG MATUTULOY MAN ANG RETAKE AT HINDI MAGPAPATALO AT HINDI MAGIGING PATAS AT MKATARUNGAN ANG PRC, DAPAT SIBAKIN MUNA SILA SA PWESTO BGO ANG RETAKE!
grabe, bulok talaga PRC. from their building to the system pati mga empleyado bulok. patawarin ako ng mga may relatives sa PRC pero putsa naman hindi na sila nag improve. alam ko mahirap trabaho nila pero lahat naman tayo ganun.
hindi na nila naisip na everytime may ganitong mga issue they are putting the future of other people at risk.
kahit anong propesyon pa yan. ano na lang sasabihin ng international community sa mga pilipino, puro tayo mandaraya??
dapat tanggalin na kayo dyan sa mga hinayupak na pwesto nyo. sinasayang nyo pera ng Pilipinas!wala kayong kwenta!
ako, kung sa PRC ako nagtatrabaho tapos may ganyan, mag reresign na ko,o kaya magpakamatay na lang kayo parang hapon. wala kayong integrity. pati tuloy mga walang kasalanan nadadamay.
kawawa yung mga magreretake. and this goes for all, pati yung mga nursing graduates last year, i feel for them.
PRC!
there are incidents like this happen before yet hindi kau ng decide ng retake..bakit sa batch lang nmin nangyari ito.
npka inconsistent and unreasonable ninu mgdecide. Nandahil lng sa "statistically improbable!" hindi nmin kasalanan na nasagutan nmin exam nyo. wla nmng leakage cheating lng un it's only an isolated case bakit dinadamay ninyo pati kami sa luzon at visayas.
sali na kayo sa mutiny namin... para sa pagbabago... pabagsakin natin ang bulok na sistema... itapon niyo na yang mga lisensya niyo... para sa gobyerno lang yan...
hanggang d2 na lang ba kayo!/ gs2o nyo pagbabago simulan nyo, ala man lang me makita na gsto ng pagbabago puro koment lang kayo@! magset kau ng tym para mit tau lahat! magkaisa lahat ng nagtake
Nakikidalamhati ako sa inyong mga hinaing. Hindi nga naman ninyo kasalanan kung ang binigay na exam sa Hydraulics ay 1+1 = 2.Masyado lang naunderestimate ang kakayahan nating CE na mag solve nang problem. Nagkamali ang examiner sa pagbigay ng exam. Nag over react naman ang PRC.
Hindi lang kayo ang apektado dito kundi pati kaming mga engineer na, kaya dapat kumilos din ang PICE.
Yung iba rin sa atin hindi nag iisip kung magbigay ng comment sa site nato.Hindi nakakatulong kundi lalo pang nagdagdag sa problema. Kilangan magkaisa kayo sa laban na to dahil kredibilidad ang nakataya dito. Sino ba ang makikisimpatiya sa inyo kung puro away at pagyayabangan na lang ang gagawin ninyo.
Ako ay isang instructor sa isang school na hindi naman kilala pero alam ko ang hirap na dinaanan ng mga student ko para lang makapasa.Malaki na sana ang tsansa ng mga student ko na makapasa base sa performance nila sa review center pero nabulilyaso lahat.
Akoy nananawagan sa inyo na itigil na ang mga comment na hindi nakakatulong kundi lalo pang nakakasira sa ating propesyon.
Ang advice ko ay ihanda ang sarili para kung matuloy ang retake ay wala pa ring problema.
You also call the attention of your school officials kung ano magagawa nila.Most of all pray for a positive outcome... God Bless You...
to PRC
Mga gago!!!
to prc
mga bulok kamo, ano it iyo huna ha amon, lurong lurong na kamo?
mga birat kamo hit iyo iroy!!!!
http://ce1107boardexaminees.multiply.com/
to all nov. 2007 board examinees eto po ang ating unofficial site.. dito ipopost ang announcement at schedules para sa gagawin nating hakbang against PRC.. tnx..
guys kelangan nting magkaisa laban sa bulok n sistema ng lintek na PRC yan..
MAtulungan tau.. mananalo tau kc ns tama tau!
i agree with ce intructor
for nov07 takers, iam with you, but i dont think prc read your posts here... so every message you post for prc doesnt make you any good at all. you are planning your "MOVE" for almost three days already but no updates yet... if you plan to fight, act as soon as possible. posting blogs here doesnt make any people (out there reading your blogs) work for you. YOU must work for it. dont forget also to BE READY for whatever circumstances that may come your way.
for those who have posted some unsolicited remarks, if you do not intend to help then pls STOP making noise.
sana makiisa kayo samin..
kung gusto nyo ng mgandang resulta sama sama tayong kumilos..
nakikiusap ako senyo..
walang mangyayari kung nkaupo lang kayo sa harap ng PC at matapang na nagkokomento...
NGAYON IPAKITA NATIN N NAGKAKAISA ANG LAHAT NG EXAMINEE...
AT GAGAWIN NATIN ANG LAHAT NG PARAAN WAG LANG MATULOY ANG RETAKE
hanggang koment na lang kayo! ala hapen pag ganyan palagi mag act kau as soon as possible! o kaya accept na lang na retake time is running out
hanggang koment na lang kayo! ala hapen pag ganyan palagi mag act kau as soon as possible! o kaya accept na lang na retake time is running out
hanggang koment na lang kayo! ala hapen pag ganyan palagi mag act kau as soon as possible! o kaya accept na lang na retake time is running out
hanggang koment na lang kayo! ala hapen pag ganyan palagi mag act kau as soon as possible! o kaya accept na lang na retake time is running out
tumiwalag na tayo sa bulok na sistema...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Eb9MZWXidk
Wake up men! di ito oras para magsisihan. I think deserving tong batch ninyo magretake dahil everytime na magcheck ako ng website na ito, puro kayabangan ang nakalagay. Biruin mo wala pang result kung di topnotcher ang pinaguusapan eh kung sinong school or university ang magaling. Wag sanang maoffend ung iba pero thats my observation. Di ako matalino di rin naman ako bobo. Simpleng tao
lang ako pero pinagmamalaki ko na nakapasa ako ng board examination ko na walang cheating. Im proud to say na 73.33 lng ang grade ko pero fair naman. Daming CE examinee di pa man engineer mayabang na what if kung engineer na kayo di lalo kayong yayabang. Hello pare-pareho lang kayong tao di basehan kung mataas ang grade mo sa exam kung magiging successful ka sa buhay. Gawin ninyong lahat magpahinga na kayong lahat then tomorrow mag start na kayang magreview uli for january 2, 2008 re-take. I think this is PRC's final decision. Wala na kayong magagawa kahit sinong president pa ang tawagan ninyo. Good Luck na lang uli sa inyo.
NURSE 2006
Wake up men! di ito oras para magsisihan. I think deserving tong batch ninyo magretake dahil everytime na magcheck ako ng website na ito, puro kayabangan ang nakalagay. Biruin mo wala pang result kung di topnotcher ang pinaguusapan eh kung sinong school or university ang magaling. Wag sanang maoffend ung iba pero thats my observation. Di ako matalino di rin naman ako bobo. Simpleng tao
lang ako pero pinagmamalaki ko na nakapasa ako ng board examination ko na walang cheating. I proud to say na 73.33 lng ang grade ko pero fair naman. Daming CE examinee di pa man engineer mayabang na what if kung engineer na kayo di lalo kayong yayabang. Hello pare-pareho lang kayong tao di basehan kung mataas ang grade mo sa exam kung magiging successful ka sa buhay. Gawin ninyong lahat magpahinga na kayong lahat then tomorrow mag start na kayang magreview uli for january 2, 2008 re-take. I think this is PRC's final decision. Wala na kayong magagawa kahit sinong president pa ang tawagan ninyo. Good Luck na lang uli sa inyo.
NURSE 2006
this is not a joke..i swear! pag hindi kau nag.retake guys meh 200 na topnotchers daw sa ce board exam!
Ang hirap kasi sa atin, akala natin kung sino tayo at mapopost na lang tayo ng comment na lihis sa issue. Sapat bang dahilan na magretake kami dahil lang marami umano sa amin ang mayabang na agad ngunit hindi pa engineer? That is not the issue here. Ang ipinaglalaban namin ay binalewala ang anim na buwan naming pagsusunog ng kilay dahil sa kakulangan ng PRC. Tatanggapin namin ang retake kung sa aming mga examinees ang pagkukulang. Hindi ito larong bata na kapag nagkamali ay pwedeng ulitin ng ganun na lamang. Ipinagmamalaki ko din na nagtake ako ng board exam ng walang cheating. Hindi naman magpoprotesta ang aming mga review centers kung kung sa tingin nila ay kami ang nagkamali. Nakaka-offend ang mga taong magagaling mag-conclude ngunit hindi naman talaga alam ang tunay na issue.
Aral na lang kayo ulit..
ala na kayo magagawa..
May kapatid din akong kumuha, napaiyak ako nung nalaman kong Retake xa.. Nag aksaya ng Pera at Gasolina.. Hotel Accomodation..
Pero:
Walang problema sa retake kung alam mo naman ang kakayanan mo..
Mas maganda at Mas malinis siguro kung uulitin na lang..
Dahil:
Kapag hindi inulit yan at may ilang may leakage.. hindi mo maaalis sa iba na isiping "ganun" din ang ginawa mo..
Bakit:
Sa "Cellphone" nakuha..
napakabilis kumalat ng text..
TEKNOLOHIYA..
RETAKE kung RETAKE!!
Kung walang kinakatakot..
Kung may tiwala sa kakayanan..
at Kung Deserving ka talaga..
"PAPASA KAYO.."
so Goodluck..
Pati sa Brother ko.. huhu..
Kaya mo yan..
Love you..
john daniel.
ang dami mu namang pinagsasabi john...... anu magagawa ng reklamo mu d2 sa forum na 2h.. kung magreview ka nalang mas maganda pa... mas my future ka pa sa jan.12... sa jan 12 nyu patunayan na deserve nyu maging engr. god has always a purpose... gusto mu ba na hindi mag retake ung iba,pero hindi nyu rin mapatunayan na hindi kayu nag cheat or leakage.. im not saying na ginawa nyu/mo yun... my point is kung mag hahanap kayu ng job.. alam na ng kapwa engr. nyu ung isyu.. at you cant blame him/her na mag ka doubt sa kakayanan ng batch nov 2007... kaya for your all own sake mas maganda na mag retake nlang..
ce r21
Most of us already proved that we can pass the board exam. The problem is that we have to prove it again. Do you think that's fair? We have to suffer for the faults that aren't ours. You're the one who's making all the fuzz because you don't know how we feel. You just scrutinize us for being afraid. We are not afraid I tell you. If we have to retake the exams, so be it. We're just fighting for our rights because most of us felt violated. It's just being human my friend. Fighting for what we stand for. And as a matter of fact, we already did. Us, our review centers and PICE already did an action.
NURSING 2006,
di ito katulad ng nursing board na may leaKAGE WHILE sa amin cheating lang na pinagbibintangan leakage DATS y ipinaglalaban namin....tama lang naman ang ipagyayabang namin ang kakayahan namin at because we did all our best with due honesty!!!SPOT d DIFFERENCE....or OTHERWISE YOURS!!!
TO PRC OFFICIALS:
IT'S UNFAIR DPAT YUNG 2 LANG ANG I-PULL OUT NYO AND 1ST OF ALL AYUSIN NYO YUNG SISTEMA NYO BKIT MAY MGA LEAKAGE KAYO LANG ANG NAKAKAALAM NG SAGOT. YOU DON'T KNOW PAANO ANG PRESSURE NG BOARD EXAM. SNA WALA NA ULIT MANGYARI NA GANITO. PINAASA NYO LANG KAMI DPAT RIGHT AFTER NG INCIDENCE NGSABI NA KAYO NA VOID..ITS ALL NONSENSE!!!
di ito katulad ng nursing board na may leaKAGE WHILE sa amin cheating lang na pinagbibintangan leakage DATS y ipinaglalaban namin....tama lang naman ang ipagyayabang namin ang kakayahan namin at because we did all our best with due honesty!!!SPOT d DIFFERENCE....or OTHERWISE YOURS!!!
.......
Tama ba na ipagmayabang mo kakayahan mo????? Too much pride will consume you... dapat mong gawin magpasalamat at pinagkalooban ka ng ganyang kakayanan... hindi pinagyayabang... tama nga cla d ka pa nga rehistradong civil engineer nagmamayabang na... im just observing things here and i'm with you guys.. im a registered ce and pinagdaanan ko rin 5 yrs. mag aral at magreview..the ups and down during the review and exam at ang pinakamahirap yung pagkatapos mag exam..ang maghintay and all the expectations..naiintindihan ko kayo... laban guys..and at the same time your best defence will be..getting prepared always for the retake that may/will happen...
THIS IS FOR ALL MY CO-CE's WHO TOOK THE BOARD EXAM LAST NOV. 17-18:
GUYS IN MY OWN OPINION, IT'S OK FOR ME TO HAVE OUR "RETAKE", BUT CONSIDERING ALL THE AGONIES THAT WE HAVE GONE THROUGH JUST TO HAVE OUR "BACHELOR'S DEGREE" I THINK THAT THE PRC MADE THE WORST DECISION THAT THEY HAVE JUST POSTED A DAYS AGO. THE SAID "IRREGULARITIES" IS NOT OUR FAULT AND TO THOSE TWO PERSON WHO CHEATED THERE ARE SANCTIONS FOR THEM. THINK OF THIS GUYS; THAT THE PRC IS THE ONE WHO IS RESPONSIBLE IN PREPARING FOR THE 3 PARTS OF OUR EXAMS; THAT THE PRC IS THE ONE WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR GIVING US OUR PROCTOR'S DURING OUR EXAMS; THAT THE PRC IS THE ONLY ONE WHO HOLDS THE ANSWER KEY FOR OUR EXAM, HENCE, THE LOGIC IN MY STATEMENT IS THAT IT IS NOT TRULY OUR FAULT IF THERE ARE IRREGULARITIES THAT HAVE OCCURRED, NEITHER ONE OF US DIDN'T KNOW THAT IT MIGHT OCCURRED. IF THEY WILL PURSUE TO HAVE OUR RETAKE THEN, ALL PARTS OF THE EXAM MUST BE RETAKEN, NOT ONLY TWO PARTS OF IT. GUYS, IN THE MEANTIME WE MUST STILL BE PREPARED WHATEVER MIGHT HAPPEN. IF WE DID IT ONCE, THEN WE CAN STILL DONE NOT ONLY OUR BEST BUT TO SHOW THEM (PRC) HOW ALMOST PERFECT WE ARE...
GOOD LUCK AND GOD BLESS.
so disgusting to hear this disgusting issue...we all had done our effort for almost six months of pondering to our reviews and spending nights and days for it then suddenly it all had came to this. i never expect this tremendous scandal in our profession, as a padilla reviewee, all i had learned is to study hard, pray a lot and do it all in a sincerest act. but as the prc's word had laid, we all had no choice but to continue our struggles in succeeding this examinations. no buts, no regret and no bad cliche for those who done it... im always just wishing that it is God's will for us to do our very best for the second time. gobless us all and soon, we shall overwhelm this unpretty event of our profession...
-lucky san pedro
neust BSCE '07
nakahanda na yung panghanda ko sana. kaya lang napurnada. kasi malakas ang feeling kung papasa na ako ngayon. pangatlong take ko na kasi.nagpupuyat, nagrereview sa gabi. sa araw nagwowork.nagkasakit pa ako.after exam, umaga, tanghali, gabi, madaling araw ako nagchecheck sa net. tapos sabihin lang ng PRC, after how many days, na retake.nastressesd at nadepressed ako. magrereview akong maigi para sa retake. pero wala na akong tiwala sa PRC,katulad ng dati.magtititake ako para magkarun ng license at mapromote.Pacencia na sa mga empleyado sa PRC na ginagawa ang trabaho nila, but those na naglalabas ng leakage, wala kayong mga konsensiya, para kayong bulok na kamatis. dinadamay ang mga ksamahan.
padilla reviewees:
you are all invited to attend free review 4 d preparation of retake exam. starting dec1 for wkend class and on dec3 for regular wkday class at 8am. come and have your sked fot rev.pls bring rev notes of timbern design,
ate rhose
To All Padilla reviewees please wear black t-shirt on monday. There will be a free review from Dec. 3 to Dec 22. Please be reminded that you are not allowed to enter the premises of the review center if your not wearing black t-shirt. This is in lieau of our protest..... Thanks!
guyz, plis punta tau sa PRC dis mon. wear blak! wag tau matakot,kz karapatan natin iparating sa knila na mali ung desisyon nila,.mgdala nrin kau ng shades and caps para di masyado mahalata mga mukha ntin, incase my mga tga prc n ivideo tau, kz my kopya sila ng mga pix ntin... ung mga ngreview dto sa manila, hindi na ito issue kung sino mgling na review center,.iisa lng ang pinglalaban ntin dito.,, kya sana padilla,RI,experts,Besa reviewees mgjoin forces tau..10am sa monday ha.,. mas mpapakinggn tau pg mdmi tau na pumunta dun.. my chance pa mabgo desisyon nila, kz d pa nila nririnig side ntin...dont lose hope guys.. ipaglaban ntin pinaghirapan ntin...
NO TO RETAKE!!!
to all CE in Cebu:
we will participate the protest against PRC regarding our stand for this Re-take!
mag-set ta ug place pra mag gather!
any suggestion?
pls contact me 09064183599
makigbisog kita alang sa atong tawhanong katungod!
I AGREE WITH YOU MR. ANONYMOUS.
GUYZ, LET'S PARTICIPATE WITH
THE DEC. 3 PROTEST TO EXPRESS OUR
SIDE AS EXAMINEES DUE TO THE FACT
THAT PRC HAS EXERCISED INJUSTICE
ORDER OF RETAKE TO US CE BOARD
NOV. 2007 EXAMINEES. I REALLY DO
HOPE THAT THROUGH THE SAID
PROTEST, PRC WILL TAKE BACK WHAT
THEY HAVE SAID IN THEIR
MEMORANDUM.
THIS COMING DEC. 3, 2007,
MONDAY AT AROUND 10:00 AM, LET US GO IN FRONT OF PRC AND EXPRESS OUR
SIDE AS EXAMINEES. LET US TELL
THEM HOW HARD IT IS FOR US TO BE
JUDGED THROUGH AN UNFAIR
MEMORANDUM JUST BECAUSE OF OUR
HIGH PERCENTAGES IN THE SAID BOARD
EXAM.
LET US ALSO PRAY TO GOD THAT THIS PROTEST WILL BE SUCCESSFUL. NO TO RETAKE!
maybe we need MEDIA to cover this event!
Ilabas n lng ang result para malaman kung cno ang magre2take,,Dapat hindi CE ang mag retake,,pang nursing lng n words yan,,,dapat prc ang magretake ay i mean ang malinisan hindi tayong mga examinees,,Mata2lino masyado ang tga PRC kya dapat palitan ng mas BOBO PARA WALANG ALAM SA NGYA2RI SA EXAM,,GNUN LNG NMAN E,,DB MAGRE2TIRE N C DOC LAZARO NGAUN,,LAHAT N LNG CLA AY SUMAMA NA MAGRETIRE PARA LAGING HAPI,,EN HAPI ANG NEW YEAR,,KC WALA N CLANG TRABAHO,,HINDI N KC AKO MAKAPAG CONCENTRATE SA PAGREVIEW NG RETAKE EXAM,,RETAKE B?AY HINDI RE EXAM PALA,,ILABAS NYO N RESULT PARA ALAM NMIN KUNG MAGRE2TAKE O MAGPA2INOM AKO NGAUNG PASKO,,,,,,MAGSAYA KAYONG TAGA PRC,,HINDI LNG IISA ANG ARAW,,KUNG IISA WALA NG BUKAS,,
ILABAS ANG RESULT MGA BOBOsing N TAGA PRC PARA MALAMAN N NMIN,,
guyz, ganito gawin natin. simultaneous nating gawin ung rally natin sa manila, cebu, davao, cagayan de oro at baguio. at exactly 10:00 am simulan natin ang rally natin in front of PRC in our respective places. dito sa manila, sure na pupunta kami sa monday ng 10am. pero sana jan sa mga provinces, ganun din. sana kung sino makabasa nito, ipaalam nyo agad sa mga kasama nyo. magkaroon nalang tayo ng text brigade para magkaroon tau unity sa gagawin nating hakbang para di matuloy retake.
GUYS, REMEMBER, NUMBERS COUNT IN THIS KIND OF SITUATION!!! MAS MADAMI, MAS MAPAPAKINGGAN TAYO.
magdala po kayo kopya ng memo in case na may media na maginterview satin para maipakita natin na napakababaw ng kanilang dahilan para bigyan tau ng retake. guyz, propesyon natin ang nakataya dito kaya wag taung pumayag na dungisan NILA ang propesyon natin.
sa PICE, sana matulungan nyo kami. kayo ang tatay namin sa industriya. kayo lang mkakatulong samin.
WEAR BLACK THIS COMING DEC. 3, 2007 10:00AM
SABI NG KAKILALA KO SA PRC, ALAM NYO BA NA 75% ANG NAT'L PASSING NGAYON KAYA HINDI MKAPANIWALA ANG PRC NA GANUN KATAAS KAYA BINIGYAN TAYO RETAKE. di ba guys, napakaunfair nun???
KADWAAN NYO AKO SA PAGCOMENT SO THAT PARA TAPNU MY COMPANION AKO,,TAPNU MA EXPRESS NTIN ITI SKIT NG INSIDE THE PUSO,,MABAG2TIT KAMIN,,MY LEAKAGE B?PANG NURSING LNG YAN?
UY TAGA PRC MAGKANO CINGIL NYO PER QUESTION SA EXAM?BUTI P KAU ISANG QUESTION E MAYAMAN N KAU,,KMI CRA N FUTURE NMIN SA MGA KAGA2WAN NYONG KABAL2AN
inuman n lng tayo,,uhm mag flash nga kayo ng memo?
sang-ayon ako kay engr. angelito. dapat ipaglaban natin to. hindi ito katulad ng nursing na napatunayang may leakage talaga. satin, ung sa structural issue, isolated case lang yun. at yung sa hydro naman, madali tlga yung binigay na exam kaya magtataka kayo kung binasa nyo ung memo, manggagalaiti ka sa galit.
nkarating rin sa akin ang balita na 75 nga ang passing. lam ko na nararamdaman nyo din ang nararamdaman ko na kasama tayo dun sa 75 na yun kaya sumama tayo dun sa protesta ngayong lunes.
salamat po engr. angelito, nalamn ko tungkol dito. yaan nyo po, punta kami ng mga kaibigan ko sa lunes. kitakita nlang po tayo doon. kahit saang review center naman po nagmula diba?
oo naman. kahit saang review center pa yun. kung sana merong mga totoong engineer na sasama eh di mas maganda diba? yung sa PICE sana pagbigyan tayo.
LET'S GO GUYZ!!!
TEXT NAMAN TAYO SA DZMM TELERADYO.
PAG ANG HOST AY SINA KAREN DAVILA,TIN BERSOLA, JULIUS BABAO, KORINA SANCHEZ AT TED FAILON, TEXT KAYO TUNGKOL SA ISSUE NATIN PARA MAABOT SA MEDIA.
TEXT DZMM_REACT_(YOUR COMMENTS) SEND TO 2366 FOR SMART,T&T,GLOBE AND SUN SUBSCRIBERS
NATRY KO NA MAGTEXT JAN KASO DI BINASA NI TED FAILON KASI MAGTATIME NA XA NUN. MGA AROUND 8:30-10:30 NG AM ATA SILA. TINGNAN NU NLANG PARA LANG MAPAABOT NATIN SA MEDIA
TAMA GUYS, LUMABAN TAU!
NASA TAMA TAU!
MASYADO TAU MINAMALIIT NG PRC KOMO MADAMI ANG NAKAPASA!
KUNG PAPAYAG TAU MG RETAKE EH PARANG PUMAYAG N DIN TAU N CHEATER TAU..
KHT DI ME SURE N PASADO ME S NKRAANG EXAM EH DI ME PAYAG SA RETAKE N YAN KC MAKAKASIRA YAN STING RECORD..
PANO KITA KITS NA LANG SA MONDAY SA MY HARAP NG PRC..
MAGKAISA TAU!
I'LL BE THERE!
GODSPEED
sna hangg't maaga pa, mkilala n ung mga sangkot s CHEAT DAW....OK rn cguro n malaman nmn ung scores nmn s MATH kung mgkakaretake man pra malaman ung chances nmn n pumasa or kung magTOP (NAKS hehehe).....PERO la tlga ako mkitang valid reasons pra ulitin ung exam s HYDRAULICS and GEOTECHNICAL.....kung nung sabado ngkapasahan ng sagot pero wlang nhuli....malamang maraming mataas rn s math.....prehas ng araw ng exam ung math and hydraulics so dpat damay-damay un.....pero bkit sinabay s STRUCTURAL ung HYDRO????bkit nmn kc d inannounce s date kung kelan ngkahulihan???? bat pinaabot pa kung kelan mrami ng tga probinsya ng-uwian???wag nmn kyo mgbigay smin n g reason pra mg isip n bka may gnawang kababalaghan or milagro dyan s PRC.....ang msama nyan eh kung nangyari na.......GODBLESS nlng STIN n honest at ndamay lng.....^^WLANG MAITUTULONG ang SORRY ng PRC skin......
wala rin akong makitang dahilan para ulitin ang hydro part. hindi katanggap-tanggap na gawing null ang results dahil lang sa matataas na scores natin. matatanggap ko pa kung retake structural lang kasi dun naman may napabalitang cheating diba.
count me in!..
im with you guys!
The two who cheated is from cdo center but it doesn't mean that all who took in cdo cheated..
The two who cheated is from two different school " 1 from MPSC(Mindanao polytechnic state college) and the other one is from URIOS University (Butuan school)".. Dis students have family names starting with letter C as wat i have herd while taking the exam (may dalawang taong nahuli sa room na ngsisimula sa "C" ang family name..
Guys kami ay nakikiisa sa inyo..
NO TO RETAKE
Ill try to look for the name of the two cheaters and ill post it here as i have their names...
kumusta naman mga taga PRC? wala ba kayong awa sa min mga nagpakahirap mag aral, at araw araw nag-abang nang results para ibalita sa family namin ang result... nagtyaga kami mag-aral, nagtiis ako malayo sa mga pamangkin ko, family ko dahil sa pagrereview... tapos RETAKE... wala naman kami magagawa kung easy tlga ang exam sa geo/hydrau...un na nga lang pag-asa ko para makapasa ako dahil sobrang hirap nang math at design...sana magkaroon naman kayo nang KONSIDERASYON mga taga PRC dahil hindi basta basta ang paghahanda namin para sa board exam na yon. at dun sa mga nag cheat, c God na bahala sainyo, sana makonsensya kayo...nakakabadtrip kayo...nandamay pa kayo...
Sa ating mga nagsunog nang kilay, kakayanin natin to... God is with us...
GUYS LALABAN TAU!
NO TO RETAKE!
GODSPEED
Bakit ayaw niyo ng retake?
Are u afraid na baka wala ng leakage?
If the PRC ordered us to retake, then lets do it. Patunayan natin na we can have high score again.
bakit ayaw niyo ng retake? Are u afraid na baka wala ng leakage?
If the PRC ordered us to retake, then lets do it. Patunayan natin na we can have high score again.
against po ako sa retake!lalo na yung sa hydro&geotech...tama ba namang nagbigay sila ng madali tapos pag maraming nakasagot, di nila paniniwalaan?dapat nilagay nalang nila sa instruction palang na bawal iperfect para wlang nakaperfect...sobrang unfair sila!pero kung yan ang gusto ng mga PRC na yan...cge guys, patunayan nating sagot natin talaga yun!!!ipakita nating magagaling talaga tayo!!!go batch 2007!!!fight tayo!!!
Sana ipalabas nang prc yung result nang math para malaman ko naman kung magreretake pa ba ako o sa May 2008 na lang ulit ako mag exam. Nakakalungkot naman ang pangyayari sa tin, pero kung tutuusin naman tlga easy naman tlga ang geo/hydrau...bakit kailangan pa magretake nang subject na yun...kainis tlga. Go ako sa gagawin sa dec. 3... sana matauhan ang mga taga PRC...
guys, what if payag nalang tayo sa re-take? kasi ma-stress lang minds natin sa kaka-rally tapos di rin tayo pakikingan, i mean its not a sign of giving up, kailangan din tayo mag step back to have good start..
kung ibibigay ng panginoon, papasa rin ulit tayo!..
Atlantis, does that mean you're giving up your rights and it's ok that PRC violated you? Think of it. Giving up is synonymous to failing. Giving your best fight is as sweet as victory. Remember, nothing is impossible to God.
mga USC CE astig.. game s lahat ng mga bagay.... RETAKE? lets get it on
to daniel johns:
pare ma-uubosan lang tayo ng energy at pagdating ng board exam puyat na utak natin, i mean hindi sa pagiging selfish but i think we have to accept the fact, wala na tayong magagawa right now, ipa-ubaya nalang natin sa panginoon ang lahat.. we honestly took the exam d naman cguro tayo papabayaan ng panginoon..
kailangan natin mag-prepare not only our mental but also our emotional.. im sorry guys but im out of this.. gud luck nalang sa pakikibaka! at sa "retake"..
papasa at papasa din tayo!..
GUYS LAM NYO BA NA AABUSO LANG YANG PRC KUNG BSTA BSTA LANG TAU SUSUKO!
GINAGO N NGA TAU EH PABABAYAAN PA NTIN.. EH INDE AMAN MAKATARUNGAN UN GINAWA NILA STEN..
TSAKA MABABAHIRAN LNG ANG ATING PROPESYON PAG PUMAYAG TAU NG RETAKE.. TATATAK SA PANGALAN NTN ANG "CHEATING".. MAPAPAGTANTO NYO YAN GUYS PAGDATING NG PANAHON..
WAG TAU MAWALAN NG PAGASA!
GODSPEED!
guys kung ayaw nilang maniwala na kaya natin at 75% passing ang c.e. y not pag retake i 100% natin ang passing nang mata-ohan ang mga taga prc nayan na kaya natin i perfect ang exam ng walang leakage at talagang na perfect natin na walang leakage para ng sa ganun ,apahiya sila!! SA MGA CHEATERS GOODLUCK SA INYO!! mag leakage nanaman ba kayo? mga bobo kayo eh!
Urios college, name KELVIN CHUA, AND MPSC(CDO) surenamed Cumba (Correction)
“Ang dalawang cheater na dumamay sa lahat *
They came from one room lang
To clarisse:
Urios college, name KELVIN CHUA, AND MPSC(CDO) surenamed Cumba (Correction)
“Ang dalawang cheater na dumamay sa lahat *
They came from one room lang
Nahuli sila bandang 12:45 noon (which means na wala talagang leakage kasi malapit na yong tym nang nakuha nila ang msg)
HINDI tayo takot sa retake kung retake edi retake dbah basta tama yong dahilan... ang sa atin dito ay dapat ipakita natin sa kanila na bilang examinees ay may karapatan din tayong dapat ipaglaban.. sa ginagawa nila e parang ginagawa lang nila uto2 dbah.. Kaya dapat lang na lumaban tayo kasi alam natin na tayon ay nasa tama...
just wanna ask...
hindi ba nila ipo-post ung naka pasa sa math? paano na ung mga hindi naka 50% sa math? aasa lang ba sa wala?
hey...
may ginagawa na ba ang PICE about this? pasensya na, kasi nasa province ako... hindi ako updated sa actions ng PICE...
wa ring news or anything about this issue sa website ng PICE...
wala namang urios college eh, bka urios university. or (FSSU) at wala ring kelvin chua may chua pro hindi kelvin name nya. sana ma post kung sino ang mga cheaters nayan!
nangyari na dati sa amin ung cellphone, may magttxt na magaling ung maaga matapos den pasa2 na un,last may un hapen sa amin
nangyari na dati sa amin ung cellphone, may magttxt na magaling ung maaga matapos den pasa2 na un,last may un hapen sa amin
haha!!okai lng yan mga future engineers!
now u know how nurses suffered also last june 2006 board exams..
pack 1, pack all kasi yan basta mass ang mgtake ng board exams kya wag nu nah cchin ang PRC kasi dts part of life..
there's no one to blame hir..
cchin nu mga kasama nyo for bringing and for being stupid in cheating the exams..
ewan q lng qng ngstudy b tlaga cla or their just being stupid!!
god bless nlng sa nu lahat n ngtake..
hope to c ur names on the webpage and on newspapers!!avisala!!
buong family nmin ngkgulo pnalayas ako ng mga kptid ko dhil s gastos,PRC sn wla ng re-take maawa kyo s kgya ko.SLMAT PO!
FSUU or URIOS Uni. or URIOS college iisa lang yon dbah... by the way sure ako na Chua yong name ng taga FSUU di kulang alam first name niya... Kilala niyo bah ang CHUA ng FSUU (Fr. Sat. Urios University) ?? post his full name pls at kung sino man nakakakilala kay CUMBA ng MPSC (Mindanao Poly. state Col.) pls post his full name... Cla yong nahuling ngcelphne sa exam
Thanks po. Pls post their names
WAG PO TAU SUSUKO!
SANA MASAYA CHRISTMAS NTIN!
GODSPEED!
protest nalang tayo para mapansin pa ng media eto.. at ska ng people in the philippines will discover how prc is so corrupt...
to prc.. (pagbantay na mu... kay mubalik sa inyo ang kalokoha na himu ninyo,.,,) God knows that justice will prevail.. we are honest in taking up the exam.. maslalo n yung ngtake ng exam sa manila.. i think you have to regret it ano mga decisions nyo...
DAPAT PINAG ICPAN MUNA NG PRC BAGO CLA NAGDESISYON.. ALA ATA CLA ICP EH.. DI B NILA INICP UNG MGA WALANG KSLANAN.. PATI UN MGA NAGASTOS NTIN..
KAWAWA NMN MGA MAGULANG NTIN..
GODSPEED!
i wonder whats happening now sa prc... dba may rally ng 10 A.M. sa harap ng prc mla.... too bad i was not able to join... number counts, so i hope marami ang sumama and the rotten prc will finally admit that they made a no brainer excuse.
db sa ue ung nagcheat..bakit letter c ung apilyedo???db a to i sa mlqu ng exam???
MAG ARAL NALANG KAYO....... PAG ARALAN NYO N ANG MGA D NYO NADAANAN DHIL TYAK NA 31% LANG TO 35% ANG IPAPASA NI ENGR LAZARO...........YARI KYO,,,, IBABALIK ANG HYDRO,,,,KONTI NLANG ANG GEO.....AT MORE ON STRENGTH DESIGN AT RCP..... PATI MOVING LOADS SA STRUCTURAL IBBGAY RIN,,,,TSAKA PLATES AND FILLET WELDS IBBGAY NRIN.... WAG KYO MAG EXPECT NG MADALI,,, DHIL AYAW NG PRC NA MARAMI ANG PUMASA.... KAYA MAGDASAL KYO..... LAHAT NG SANTO AY TWAGIN NYO,,, DAHIL DELUBYO ANG DARATING SA INYOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO...HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
PRC lets all be reasonable... first and foremost its not our fault if the exam was easy... to be honest, the exam was relatively easy most specially if you did indeed study... second, its notour fault kung nalusutan ang watchers... you cannot and should not blame the fault of 2 people caught cheating to all who took the exam.... third... lets face it, wala na talagang credibility and PRC.... you dont take for consideration the hardship the examinees underwent as well as the parents... YOUR RESOLUTION TO THE PROBLEM IS "UNREASONABLE"... you just wanted to protect your name para kunwari your doing something about it... but to think of it its really your fault..... we are not the one who failed.. YOU (PRC) are....
my bago na ibig sabihin ang R.I.
Re-take Innovations!!!
wahahahaha!!!
if i were to be asked diba dapat yung 2 ng cheat lang ang dapat parusahan? tapos conduct investigation dun sa watcher ng room na nahulihan ng cheat... kasi in the first place bakit sila nalusutan... o baka naman sinadyang palusutin.... everybody knows na bawal ang phone during the exam so both cheaters dont have any excuses lalo na ang watchers.... let 2 who cheated fail and be debard in the coming exam... pero let the real result be published.... give us all a break...
people IMBESTIGADOR natin yan.. lets try.. God Bless
Urios college yan dati. bago lang naging university..kaya cguro nag che cheat taga urios to maintain their status..d ba sa mga previous exam me nasasali na rin sa top na taga urios....
Urios college yan dati. bago lang naging university..kaya cguro nag che cheat taga urios to maintain their status..d ba sa mga previous exam me nasasali na rin sa top na taga urios....
Urios college yan dati. bago lang naging university..kaya cguro nag che cheat taga urios to maintain their status..d ba sa mga previous exam me nasasali na rin sa top na taga urios....
You know what CE1941, those topics you mentioned are the ones we expected to be asked on our board exams. Too bad the examiners gave us very easy questions that's why 75% of us passed. So, never bother to scare us, ok. It seems that you only have a fraction of a mind.
ce1941, tanga k! madami nga hydro nung exam eh. bobo!!!
to anonymous....
mas tanga ka dhil retake k....tanga k dhil ppnalangin ko na BUMAGSAK K NG BUMAGSAK.... DHIL AKO AY NEVER AKO KKUHA DHIL TPOS NKO DYAN.........KAWAWA K NMAN DHIL HANGANG NGAYON AY UMAASA KNG PUMASA..........HIRAP YATA MAGREVIEW...........HHAHAHAHAHAHA
to anonymous
hirap yatang magreview,,,, kawawa k naman umasa k na masaya ang pasko mo........
ulol ce1941 madali kaya moving loads hahahahahah pakita mo lang na bopols ka! myawwwwwww
CE 3,000,000 B.C., you don't sound like you passed the board at all. I think you're just a bum with nothing to do with your worthless life.
HAYYYY!
UN MGA WALANG MAGAWA S BUHAY AT NANANAKIT LNG NG DAMDAMIN NG NARIRITO, MAKAKARMA DIN KAU! MANYAPAT ALA KAU S KALAGAYAN NMIN!
GODSPEED!
Back to being Sendoh...
Na erase yung comment ko yung galit na galita ako sa mga nag cheat na ipina hunting ko sila
sa mga moderator ng blog na ito sorry po i was just so angry kasi magkasakit na yuing baby ko sa ka hihintay sa reslut 2 weeks ago tapos ganito nangyari...sori po uli i hope u understand
my brothers and sisters, ididnt take the board pero i share your pain...because the pesron I love is in so much pain pero sa ngayon life must go on, She's studying again pero hindi na hanggagng alas 5 ng umaga kasi may trabaho pa kami. Sa ngayon all we can hope and pray that a miracle happens and the results come out at maraming makakpasa...
kudos to the people who are fighting for the rights of all the CE'S who took the board. galing namin dito sa cebu, mga bayani talaga kayo, ano man ang resulta, salamat sa pakikibaka at pakikimanok ninyo dyan.
Mga bro at sis, nakakaliw nga magaway dito cause it take tension off things pero I hope u still devote a few hours para makareview ng kaunti...alam ninyo sistema natin bulok so it still pays to be prepared
alam kong pasado kayo lahat
Baby
Until this ends
Only the best
Sendoh Akira
#7 shooting guard ryonan high
to c31941
sa mga sinasabi mo sana wag yang lalabas pag lumabas yan sobra 75% nanaman ang passing kawawa ang prc mag retake nanaman alam naman natin yan na ang bago nilang patakaran baka ma dissolve nalang ang prc nayan. guys buti pa mag review nalang tayo there's more to life than this board exams atleast we still all have our family to back us up, kaya sa lahat pati na sa prc MERRY CHRISTMAS AND A HAPPY NEW YEAR!!!
Breaking News - NATION
Civil engineering examinees protest board retake
December 03, 2007
Updated 19:53:03 (Mla time)
Margaux Ortiz
Inquirer
MANILA, Philippines -- More than 100 civil engineering board takers held a rally Monday, demanding that the Professional Regulation Commission (PRC) set aside its decision nullifying the results of the November 17 and 18 licensure exams.
Examinees Neil Erich Galicia and Dianne May Casimiro, who spearheaded the protest in front of the PRC office on Nicanor Reyes Street in Manila, said it was their duty and responsibility to protest against the injustice being committed against them.
“We are not afraid of retaking the examinations, but due process is needed before the PRC can decide on nullifying the results of two of our subjects,” Galicia, a graduate of Ateneo de Naga, said in an interview.
More than 4,700 civil engineering graduates took the board exams last November 17 and 18.
On November 26, the PRC announced that the test results in two of the three subjects -- Hydraulics and Geotechnical Engineering and Structural Engineering and Construction -- would be nullified after two examinees were caught cheating in the two subjects.
The regulatory commission ordered a retake on January 12.
The two were caught with cell phones which contained answers to 30 questions, 21 of which turned out to be correct.
Galicia said the actions of the two should not be taken against other examinees who are innocent.
“It is also wrong to compare our situation with that of the June 2006 nursing licensure examinations,” he added, stressing that while the nursing licensure exams involved the leakage of test answers, the civil engineering board examinations entailed the alleged cheating of only two examinees.
In their petition asking the PRC to reconsider its decision and immediately order the release the results of the November 17 and 18 board exams, Casimiro and more than 200 graduates reasoned out that they got high marks in the hydraulics subject because the questions presented were “basic, fundamental and elementary concepts which future civil engineers should and must know.”
“Otherwise, the profession would suffer a sorry fate if those questions could not be answered correctly by the examinees,” the petitioners said.
The PRC had said that "after evaluation of the examination results in the Hydraulics and Geotechnical Engineering subject, (it found the results) to be statistically improbable considering the unusually high grades or ratings obtained by the examinees.”
The examinees also described the PRC's declaration as alarming.
“For one, there is no law, or any rule, regulation, resolution, or memorandum issued by the Honorable Commission that makes 'unusually high grade/rating' a ground for nullifying examination results,” they said.
Jobert Pahilga, lawyer of the civil engineering graduates, said that if the PRC fails to act on their petition, they would try to obtain a temporary restraining order from the court.
The TRO, Pahilga explained, would hopefully prevent the PRC from holding the second set of examinations on January 12.
“PRC Chair Leonor Tripon-Rosero's secretary promised us that she would meet the examinees within the week,” Casimiro said.
She lamented that prospective employers have been asking about the results of their board examinations.
“We should be able to take our oath on December 15 and apply for jobs after that. Unfortunately, our lives have been put on hold because of this,” Casimiro said.
©2007 www.inquirer.net all rights reserved
Wag naman sana mg TRO.. Kelan pa tau magiging engineer n'yan.. Rather hav a retake dan wait 4 how long.. Let's just luk 4 justice after we have our licenses kakapagod kac mg antay, it's d agony of waiting..
USC WA MAHADLOK SA RETAKE!!! BRING IT ON!!!
to REE2001:
hoy ulol ka! anong akala mo sa amin bobo? talaga namn madali lng ang hydro at geotech...
GUYS, IPAGDASAL N LANG NTIN NA SANA EH MAAYOS N TONG LAHAT.. SANA EH WALANG RETAKE.. AT SANA EH MARAMING NAKAPASA..
NO TO RETAKE!
GODSPEED!
Master_Player said...
Wag naman sana mg TRO.. Kelan pa tau magiging engineer n'yan.. Rather hav a retake dan wait 4 how long.. Let's just luk 4 justice after we have our licenses kakapagod kac mg antay, it's d agony of waiting..
USC WA MAHADLOK SA RETAKE!!! BRING IT ON!!!
December 4, 2007 8:33 AM
Hoy Ok k lang pano kung kaw n lang mag retake pano mo masasabi na wala ulit retake kung sakaling maretake ka.. pano pag pinagretake ka ulit reretake ka ulit ganun hanggangt magsawa ka sa pagreretake o mag sawa sila sa pag paparetake ha..... mag-isip ka nga... kaw n lang magretake i rather w8 long than retake and have my liciese clean and not attached that i'm one of the retaker that have issue of cheating..
Sa lahat n kasama nming nalaban sa ginagawa ng PRC tuloy lang natin toh sabi nga sa amin malaki ang laban ntin d2 kasi it's not our fault sa PRC... kaya fight 4 our right don't let them ruin it...
hi to team eloisa!!!misu guys!!!wel juz pray na walang ng retake!hehehe!sama tau rally!!!wahahaha!!
special mention 2 ethel,mishu alot!txt mu naman q...:)
kay jhigs and marben,bakla ng eloisa,mis ko na kau sis!!!
ahOOOO!!
MAGTULONG TULONG PO TAU..
UMATEND PO TAU NG SILENT PROTEST S THURSDAY..
WEAR BLACK SHIRT
GODSPEED
dala tayo ng mga lonely or soft music-christmas songs such as "pasko na sinta ko", "silent night", etc..para maantig naman mga puso nila..
—–> A massive mobilization infront of PRC office will push through on Thursday, December 6, 2007, at 10 am. Assembly will be at P. Noval St., Sampaloc, Manila. (in front of R.I review cnter)
TOM. nA PO UNG DIALOGUE w/ the PRC PLS PARTICIPATE,,
wla taung mararating kung dito lng tayo nagwawala, PLS TXT UR CE FRIENDSTERS AS WELL..
To the people who will join the protest December 6, 2007
All of us here in Cebu are praying for you, Im not really sure kung nag organize dito sa cebu sa protest rally,pero this doesn't mean na walakami pakialam sa inyo,andito kayo sa puso namin
to brod eric and sis diane, ano man mangyari, fighter kayo,saludo kaming lahat sa inyo...i hope one day me and my baby will be able to shake hands with such fine people.
to my fellow CE In cebu
by the way eto lang ang maitutulong ko sa inyo
I spoke to a gma 7 kanina, they don't know anything about what happened to the CE Board exam...if you want to air out your grievances to the public, here is your chance, she will be calling me back this friday so if you want to arrange an interview just forward me your numbers sa 09225486240 and i'll be more than willing to let you talk to her. Lou an iya name of balitang BISDAK
I did'nttake the board but I love my baby so much that why im doing this, for her, and all of you kasi CE tayong lahat
KUDOS NINYO DHA SA MANILA!!!
Baby
till this ends
only the best
ilove you so much you just don'tknow it
Akira Sendoh
#7 Shooting guard Ryonan high
sa mga CE Reviewee na mag dialogue with the PRC personnel...
kami dito sa cebu ay nagpadala nang representative... ABAT yonh nick niya... sana magtagumpay kayo... At hindi sana kayo tatalikuran nang PRC...
go ABAT... mabuhay ka...
tingog pud duh! para naa tay tingog diri...
mabuhay USC...
guyz, whatever the decision that the PRC's will make, let's respect that, let us show them what "PROFESSIONALS" really means so as to insult them like the way they have insulted our "KNOWLEDGE" on taking our board exam this last november. I don't really want to give any statement but of all your comments here that i have read, i think i must also give my opinion about this issue. it is sad to say that some professionals from other countries have heard this issue and i've talked to some of them telling me that "IT IS REALLY NOT RIGHT TO HAVE YOUR RETAKE SINCE IT WAS NOT THE FAULT OF MAJORITY, PUNISHMENT SHALL ONLY BE GIVEN TO THOSE WHO REALLY COMMITTED IT, HENCE YOU ALONE CAN DO NOTHING ABOUT THE DECISION OF YOUR COMMISSION EVEN ALL OF YOU WHO TOOK THOSE EXAMS, THE WAY YOUR FELLOW CE's REACT TO THAT ISSUE CAN ALSO DO NOTHING BUT TO ACCEPT THE FACT THAT YOUR GOVERNMENT AND ITS SYSTEM IS THUS VERY CORRUPT AND I PITY ON THAT PART"... tama nga siya guyz na napakabulok na ng sistema ng ating gobyerno, hindi naman daw tayo ang lalabas na nakakahiya kung magkakaroon nga ng retake dahil sila ang nag-organize ng exam at nung magkaroon ng sinasabi nilang "IRREGULARITIES"; HINDI NAMAN TALAGA TAYO ANG MAY GUSTO NUN, para sa kanila "RETAKE LAMANG ANG SAGOT PARA MATAKPAN ANG MGA MALING NAGAWA NILA", ayaw nilang maniwala na 75% ang passing ngayong taon dahil nga sa rasong "MAY MGA TAONG CORRUPT SA ATING GOBYERNO AT AYAW NILANG MALAMANGAN NATIN SILA"....tama ang ipinaglalaban natin, pero kung ang ipinaglalaban natin ay pilit lamang nilang ibinabasura mawawalan lamang ng saysay ang lahat gaya nga ng nangyari sa exam natin.........
guyz, whatever the decision that the PRC's will make, let's respect that, let us show them what "PROFESSIONALS" really means so as to insult them like the way they have insulted our "KNOWLEDGE" on taking our board exam this last november. I don't really want to give any statement but after reading all your comments here, i think i must also give my opinion about this issue. it is sad to say that some professionals from other countries have heard this issue and i've talked to some of them telling me that "IT IS REALLY NOT RIGHT TO HAVE YOUR RETAKE SINCE IT WAS NOT THE FAULT OF MAJORITY, PUNISHMENT SHALL ONLY BE GIVEN TO THOSE WHO REALLY COMMITTED IT, HENCE YOU ALONE CAN DO NOTHING ABOUT THE DECISION OF YOUR COMMISSION EVEN ALL OF YOU WHO TOOK THOSE EXAMS, THE WAY YOUR FELLOW CE's REACT TO THAT ISSUE CAN ALSO DO NOTHING BUT TO ACCEPT THE FACT THAT YOUR GOVERNMENT AND ITS SYSTEM IS THUS VERY CORRUPT AND I PITY ON THAT PART"... tama nga siya guyz na napakabulok na ng sistema ng ating gobyerno, hindi naman daw tayo ang lalabas na nakakahiya kung magkakaroon nga ng retake dahil sila ang nag-organize ng exam at nung magkaroon ng sinasabi nilang "IRREGULARITIES"; HINDI NAMAN TALAGA TAYO ANG MAY GUSTO NUN, para sa kanila "RETAKE LAMANG ANG SAGOT PARA MATAKPAN ANG MGA MALING NAGAWA NILA", ayaw nilang maniwala na 75% ang passing ngayong taon dahil nga sa rasong "MAY MGA TAONG CORRUPT SA ATING GOBYERNO AT AYAW NILANG MALAMANGAN NATIN SILA"....tama ang ipinaglalaban natin, pero kung ang ipinaglalaban natin ay pilit lamang nilang ibinabasura mawawalan lamang ng saysay ang lahat gaya nga ng nangyari sa exam natin.........
Alam nyo vah kung bakita takot sila sa retake???kasi alam nila na bagsak na naman sila!!Ginagawa lang nila protestang ito kasi nagbabakasakali na ipasa cla ng PRC pag nagtagumpay..Ganun lang yun....
Alam nyo vah kung bakita takot sila sa retake???kasi alam nila na bagsak na naman sila!!Ginagawa lang nila protestang ito kasi nagbabakasakali na ipasa cla ng PRC pag nagtagumpay..Ganun lang yun....
-----------------
TAMA KA JAN!!!!
Excuse me, kaya nga may retake kasi 75% ang pumasa. Are you thinking? Dude you're so lost.
Ikaw daniel jonh.. pang ilang take mo na to????cguro hirap na hirap ka na talaga f may retake pa...
Sorry to disappoint you dude but this is just my very first take and it's kinda weird because I was expecting a very difficult exam. That's why 75% passed. I'm just an average taker but that exam is really easy.
cguro tinamad na mga examiner kaya kinuha nalang sa mga past exams yung mga tanong...
Most questions in the Hydro part are just recycled but with different givens. That's why many got high scores in Hydro.
ok lang kung may retake. kung sa tingin nyo kaya ung exam noong 17, e di kayang-kaya natin yan sa jan 12. bring it on prc... baka no match kayo
go ABAT!!
hello, ask ko lng po about any news s nangyaring event/protest s prc knina? I'm not an examinee but i have friends who took the exam las nov. any news po?tnx
GUYS, BAD NEWS.. NEGATIVE ANG APILA NTIN S PRC..
OPTIONAL RETAKE DAW.. KUNG SAKASAKALI N MNNLO UN KSO NTIN EH KHIT BAGSAK UN RETAKE NTIN AT PASA UN NOV EXAM NTN EH ANG IHOHONOR EH UN NOV.. EH PNO KPAG BAGSAK NUN NOV TPOS PASADO NUN RETAKE.. PNO UN?
HAYYY..
GAGO KAU MGA TAGA PRC..
SORRY FOR THE TERM GUYS.. SOBRA GALIT LNG..
i attended kanina miting, 641 got a perfect score sa geo and 40% among the examinees got a grade of 90% above and 50% got a grade of 70%,no words among prc kanina sa closedoor miting. pls among those hu would like na no retake coordinate with us we need to have the consensus of each of us to know, useless din kac pag sulong namin na no retake eh in reality mas madami mag reretake, guys mataas percentage passing natin wag tayo payag sa retake, ala laban prc sa korte base sa atty natin, pls attend po kayo may miting sa ri dec 12 with our atty,pls coordinate also sa respective places nyo f meron man group na ayaw sa retake, prc got no reason to order us of retake of the said exam, hir in manila we are doing our part pls do also ur part sa places nyo, we have to cooperate,
i attended kanina miting, 641 got a perfect score sa geo and 40% among the examinees got a grade of 90% above and 50% got a grade of 70%,no words among prc kanina sa closedoor miting. pls among those hu would like na no retake coordinate with us we need to have the consensus of each of us to know, useless din kac pag sulong namin na no retake eh in reality mas madami mag reretake, guys mataas percentage passing natin wag tayo payag sa retake, ala laban prc sa korte base sa atty natin, pls attend po kayo may miting sa ri dec 12 with our atty,pls coordinate also sa respective places nyo f meron man group na ayaw sa retake, prc got no reason to order us of retake of the said exam, hir in manila we are doing our part pls do also ur part sa places nyo, we have to cooperate,
i attended kanina miting, 641 got a perfect score sa geo and 40% among the examinees got a grade of 90% above and 50% got a grade of 70%,no words among prc kanina sa closedoor miting. pls among those hu would like na no retake coordinate with us we need to have the consensus of each of us to know, useless din kac pag sulong namin na no retake eh in reality mas madami mag reretake, guys mataas percentage passing natin wag tayo payag sa retake, ala laban prc sa korte base sa atty natin, pls attend po kayo may miting sa ri dec 12 with our atty,pls coordinate also sa respective places nyo f meron man group na ayaw sa retake, prc got no reason to order us of retake of the said exam, hir in manila we are doing our part pls do also ur part sa places nyo, we have to cooperate,
dont also expect na gaya pa rin exam, malamang konti lang papasa, pahihirapan tau kaya no to retake
if you have only read the resolution 641 out of 4782 got a perfect score, 40% of the ecaminees got a average grade of 90% above and also 50% of the rest of 60% examinees got an average of 70% avg,so magagaling tayo 70% passed, kaya wag tayo payag sa retake
if you have only read the resolution 641 out of 4782 got a perfect score, 40% of the ecaminees got a average grade of 90% above and also 50% of the rest of 60% examinees got an average of 70% avg,so magagaling tayo 70% passed, kaya wag tayo payag sa retake
here is the email add of our atty jipahilga@yahoo.com
lady arher:
ur rong my girl. optional ung retake, if ever nagretake tayo at pumasa pasado tayo kahit matalo ung kaso, if ever din nagretake tayo at bagsak kaso pasdo last november at nanalo kaso natin pasado pa rin, pero if natalo kaso na (malabong mangyari) balewala ung ung november exam, ihohonor ung retake, kaya wag tayo payag sa retake, alam ng prc na ala cla laban sabi nga kanina sa closed dor miting "we are ptotecting our integrity" tama ba naman un gumagawa sila ng graceful exit para d cla kahiyahiya
optional ung retake, if ever nagretake tayo at pumasa pasado tayo kahit matalo ung kaso, if ever din nagretake tayo at bagsak kaso pasdo last november at nanalo kaso natin pasado pa rin, pero if natalo kaso na (malabong mangyari) balewala ung ung november exam, ihohonor ung retake, kaya wag tayo payag sa retake, alam ng prc na ala cla laban sabi nga kanina sa closed dor miting "we are ptotecting our integrity" tama ba naman un gumagawa sila ng graceful exit para d cla kahiyahiya
Good evening to all of you guys and Gals...
Would just like to know what happened to the dialogue kanina, wasn't able to catch in the news if it was aired,
Ano man mangyari, thanks for your efforts, its not easy standing up all the more against this shitty system we have....
Me and my baby, from the bottom of our hearts, retake or wala, thank you....sa llahat ninyong nag rally dyan
this may be the last time i'll write here because life has to go on...
for one last time
Till all of this ends
only the best
i love you baby....
Akira Sendoh #7
shooting guard ryonan high
Wag tayong papayag ng retake. Matatalo yang PRC sa kaso. Sila ang may kasalanan dahil kanila nanggaling ang leakage. Dapat hanapin nila kung sino sa kanilang tauhan ang nagbigay ng leakage! Wag tayo ang sisihin nila! Fcuk!
Tama ka tol! Ika nga Jail the Pusher, save the User! PRC ang pusher! Users lang yung mga na tempted na nagcheat!
totoo bang my retake but yong last exam will be validated..?
pls coordinate with us, d rin namin alam if pasado kami. ginagawa namin ito para sa inyo sa lahat ng nagtake, kung papakita nyo na ala kayo suporta eh ala din saysay psaglalaban namin baka mismo kami mag give up na din pag ganun pls suport us, im asking u all to pls get the fax no of ur respective skulor just the email add of ur college,
tnx God is good,
adamson.edu.ph
president's office fax no: +63(2) 524-6590
pls coordinate also to your skul, we do always mit hir sa ri togeder with our atty, kung pde po mit kayo ng mga shulmate nyo. tnx
mga tol problema talga ng mga taga prc kung pano nila ilalabas ung 300 plus na top notcher...pano kya nila ilalabas un..kya nga isang paraan nila na wag bawiin ung retake na sinabi na nila...
dont conclude hir. atend ka sa miting pra lay alam ka, kaya nga pag nanalo tayo irerelease ung november result
Retake na nga lang para makuha na natin agad licensya natin...wala namang kaibahan pag mag take tayo..makukuha na natin licensya natin...
For those taking the December 2007 NLE Important Stuff To Read Before Taking December 2007 Nursing NLE Examination
December 2007 Nursing Board Exam Results will also be post at NurseReview.org. For those of you who want to get a copy of the nursing passers for Dec 2007, please leave your email address at List of NLE December 2007 Passers
by d way sabi din engr lazaro na ala leakage sa miting namin sa prc
we respect your decision but majority involve dito
Post a Comment